|
Back to Index
Update:
Margaret Dongo v Registrar General test case
Zimbabwe
Women Lawyers Association (ZWLA)
May 04, 2009
Zimbabwe Women
Lawyers Association would like to inform all its members and stakeholders
that the test case it initiated on guardianship was finally heard
today (Tuesday 31 October) at the Supreme Court of Zimbabwe. ZWLA
was representing Margaret Dongo against the Registrar General and
The Attorney General. Appearing on behalf of ZWLA was Ms Sarudzayi
Njerere and representing the 1st respondent was Mr. Drury of Messer's
Gollop and Blank1. The second respondent did not file opposing papers.
The facts of
the matter are as follows
The Applicant
Mrs. Dongo is married in terms of a registered customary law marriage2.
Sometime in 2006 she sought to procure a passport for her minor
son and approached 1st respondent's office (The Registrar
General). 1st Respondent refused to issue a passport in favour of
the applicant and demanded that her husband signs the application
forms as he is the legal guardian of the child. Applicant was aggrieved
by this decision and approached ZWLA for relief and this led to
the protracted legal dispute which was finally heard on the 31st
of March 2009. The questions that were referred to the Supreme Court
were as follows:
- Whether
the guardianship of Minors Act is discriminatory?
- Whether the
common law on guardianship is discriminatory of women?
- Whether the
African customary law relating to guardianship is discriminatory
of women?
- Lastly whether
this above mentioned discrimination offends against s23 (1) (a)
and (b) of the Constitution?
The
position of the law
In terms of
the Guardianship of Minors Act s3 thereof the father of children
born in wedlock is the natural guardian of such children and exercises
this right in consultation with the mother.
The Constitution
sets out the grounds for non discrimination as including sex, gender,
and marital status among others. However in s23 (3)(a) and (b) there
are exceptions set out that exclude matters of personal law and
African customary law from the discriminatory clause.
The
proceedings in brief
The court undertook
a two pronged inquiry
Firstly whether
the Guardianship of Minors Act, the common law and customary law
are in conferring guardianship on the husband for married persons
is discriminatory and secondly whether this discrimination is saved
by s23 (3) of the constitution.
Applicants counsel
argued that the Guardianship of Minors Act is discriminatory on
the basis of both sex and marital status in that a married woman
cannot exercise the right of guardianship over her child as the
law confers this right on the husband and secondly that an unmarried
woman would be able to procure the passport on behalf of her child
she would be able to do that on her own hence the law makes a distinction
between married and unmarried women.
Reference was
made to provisions in international human rights instruments such
as CEDAW and the Protocol to the African Charter on the rights of
women in Africa in relation to guardianship. In their arguments
counsel were called upon to address whether guardianship is a concept
of personal law and whether guardianship is a concept of African
customary law. 1st Respondent's argument was that since applicant
is married in terms of customary law she had consented to be governed
by a system of law that embodies discriminatory practices hence
she could not seek the relief sought. After hearing counsel from
both sides judgment was reserved.
Way
Forward
Even if we are
not successful in this case because of the exceptions highlighted
that exist in our Constitution we are nevertheless going to press
for the removal of these claw backs in the Constitutional Review
process that to be shortly undertaken.
Notes
1. At the hearing 1st
respondent mobilized approximately 7 chiefs and other officials
from the Registrar's Office. The Registrar's argument
turned in part to the upholding of cultural values and norms.
2. This marriage is potentially polygamous.
Visit the ZWLA
fact
sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|