|
Back to Index
Girls
traumatic experiences of proving rape beyond reasonable doubt
Betty
Makoni, Girl Child Network (GCN)
November 01, 2006
Rape and the
world of men
Rape
cases of minors are increasingly being reported to police, non governmental
organisations like the Girl Child Network and subsequently brought
to court in Zimbabwe. For a girl aged two to be raped by an old
man, questioned by a policeman, examined by a male doctor, "assisted"
through the justice system in court by a male prosecutor, listen
to a male defence lawyer interrogating her and then finally listen
to a male magistrate acquit the perpetrator after she has failed
to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the old man is the perpetrator
is traumatic. To be raped by a man and then go through the traumatic
experience of being assisted by men leaves a lot in the mind of
the minor. Each time a perpetrator is acquitted, girls attempt to
commit suicide, lose confidence in everything and cry for the rest
of their lives. The men’s world is not a fair world, according to
survivors of rape. When a girl is raped by a man and then go through
proving beyond reasonable doubt to a network of men that rape indeed
happened leaves permanent psychological injuries. This is often
taken for granted.
A minor must
prove beyond reasonable doubt that the man she points is the perpetrator
We should devise more effective strategies to deal with healing of rape survivors
as they report to police up until the perpetrators is sentenced
to jail. The case of a two year old girl where the 27 year old man
was acquitted in Chitungwiza in 2004 left a young couple shattered,
confused and tearful. Despite consistent statements made by the
two year old girl that weighed heavily against the perpetrator the
man was acquitted due to lack of evidence. She said it again and
again that it was Tito who put his thing "here" pointing
to her vagina. Another prominent business man was acquitted for
raping her 15 year old domestic worker. She fell pregnant and the
baby eventually died. According to the judgement there was no evidence
because the defence lawyer convinced the court that the girl consented
to sex because she had reported rape when she discovered she was
pregnant. How in the first place can a poor, orphaned 15 year old
girl consent to sex with a 60 year old businessman? The man does
not prove his innocent beyond reasonable doubt.
In one court session
in Harare a male defence lawyer asked a girl whether she was a virgin
before the rape act as if non virgin girls deserve to be raped.
When the girl answered "yes" he pulled out a male doctor’s
report and embarrassed her in open court, "Exhibit number 1.
The doctor said she was sexually active, your Honour he said."
There were giggles by males in the court and the poor girl was brought
in temporary trial session for not being a virgin. One girl pointed
out during a counselling session that she almost shrank to death
when a male doctor examined her vagina by inserting fingers. She
felt as if this was secondary rape. But how else could she have
avoided this examination if only she had to prove beyond reasonable
doubt that she was raped. When the Criminal Law Codification is
effected, it is a big relief to see female nurses allowed to write
medical reports to be used in court as evidence. It will be rape
in the world of men and women at long last. One wonders if a girl
was in the first place threatened how else can she prove beyond
reasonable doubt that the same rapist blocked her path to opening
up.
The case of
Chipo the minor again
Chipo
(not her real name) had her case shelved in court on 2 June 2004
due to lack of evidence. It is alleged that Chipo failed to demonstrate
how she was raped through male and female dolls. She had to use
dolls to prove beyond reasonable doubt how the old man raped her.
In court, children have to show through role play of dolls the "rape
act" and to them repeating the rape act through role play of
dolls is as traumatic as having a doctor insert his fingers in the
vagina. So they would rather play with the dolls than demonstrate
sexual violence perpetrated against them. When Chipo played with
the dolls peacefully rather role play sexual violence the court
acquitted the perpetrator and they said she could not say or do
what exactly happened.
The Rape Act
This
is deeper and more personal. A child has to repeat the same act
to show whether she recalls the act itself. A woman of my age would
not like such an act stage managed consciously knowing everyone
is watching as it is disgusting. The dolls to some children
are toys they play with and never want to see them rape each other.
To a lot of children violence is the last thing they want to see
on their toys. The rape act is sexual violence and no child wants
to demonstrate violence on their own dolls. In court, the "
Rape Act" is stage managed through dolls and child theory tells
us that there are negative repercussions on the part of a sexually
and psychologically injured child.
The Rape Act has
happened even with children who can relate their stories verbally.
They are asked to demonstrate through male and female dolls how
they were raped. Many a times children notice that adults are looking
at them do it and many are ashamed to act out sex for they know
their parents say its "immoral". Some children shrink
so much that they fail to stage manage the rape act in court.
Dolls
increase the degree of trauma in some sexually abused children and
adults
Are dolls an African concept? Many children are not familiar with
male dolls with imitation of male organs hanging down in very scaring
positions. Many children are familiar with female dolls whose genital
organs are internal and therefore have some form of privacy. Many
of us have never seen a male doll because patriarchy forbids. If
ever we are to use male dolls in court we have to educate children
even in school so that they do not bump into them in court as they
try to prove beyond reasonable doubt that they were raped.
Chipo told a counsellor
the painful part of her body and what had happened to her without
using dolls. She touched the vagina and said, ‘Tito akandiisa
chinhu chake". That was her simple way of stating that
she was raped and there was no need to show it through male and
female dolls because that would be secondary rape of the minor.
So with children who open up why can’t we trust what they say? Why
would a child point Tito and not the rest of men?
We need to urgently
devise ways of managing pain and trauma in minors who are raped.
It is painful to repeat an act of rape through male and female dolls
if you can easily say that through word of mouth. Rape penetrates
into the whole family and it is so piercing that one has to take
care to minimise degree of injury when children seek justice.
Children heal
faster when perpetrator is punished
For
many of us we always argue whether it helps to have the perpetrator
behind bars.. Justice and counselling are true ingredients for fast
healing for most little girls who are raped. Any action that reassures
the rape survivor that perpetrator is punished, facilitates healing
because the survivor does not feel a sense of guilt where she constantly
blames herself.
Activism around
rape
Sometimes
judiciary activism around rape of minors is a more effective way
of dealing with prevention of rampant sexual abuse of children.
This warns would be rapists. For minors it is critical to have rapist
jailed. Each time a case of rape is postponed in court girls are
even more traumatised. The rapists haunt them in the homes, schools
and communities. Certain places for minor girls become no go areas
because they know rapists would repeatedly harm them. Until rapists
like murderers are sentenced to life in jail then survivors of rape
know that when they eventually come out of prison they will be haunted
for life like in the case of an eleven year old girl who upon the
release of her father who had served 7 years in jail for raping
a thirteen year old domestic worker, he came to rape her and infected
her with HIV and AIDS.
Food for thought
We
have all unearthed rape of minors and so what is the next step?
Do we need to give it a day of planning when we are at the moment
looking at a minor who has been fatally wounded? Haven’t we talked
about this for long? Do we not need to urgently put up a team for
Urgent Action on rape of minors in the home, police, courts, schools,
churches and just everywhere to spearhead this and other pending
cases? For rapists of minors they should be guilty until proven
innocent and never vice versa. Recently media reported rape of a
one day old baby girl and there was no outcry. The whole country
a few weeks ago was gripped with fear and panicked when an 18 year
old man married a 45 year old woman. What hurts a man calls for
action yet there are thousands of under 15 year old girls raped
and forced to marry 70 year old men. Unless and until we are sensitive
to the trauma girls go through when they are raped then our action
remains infective.
Visit the GCN
fact
sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|