| |
Back to Index
A
tsunami of demolitions
Andrew
Meldrum
Extracted from New Internationalist Jan/Feb 06
January 15, 2006
http://www.africafiles.org/article.asp?ID=10865
'Our tsunami',
that's how Zimbabweans refer to the sweeping housing demolitions
that President Robert Mugabe's Government unleashed on poor city
dwellers in May last year. Waves of police and army descended on
townships in the capital, Harare, and ripped down homes that they
said were violating building codes. Whole neighbourhoods were flattened
as if they had been hit by a devastating natural disaster. 'Everywhere
I turned, I saw homes being destroyed,' said Trudy Stevenson, the
opposition member of Parliament who represents the Hatcliffe settlement,
an area virtually obliterated when more than 400 homes were torn
down. 'It was like a scene out of the anti-apartheid movie Cry
Freedom when they showed the forced removals in South Africa.
I couldn't believe it was happening in Zimbabwe.
The demolished
Hatcliffe homes had been constructed under a US aid project and
had all the required permits, say residents. A mosque, a church,
an orphanage and a health clinic were also destroyed. Harrowing
eyewitness accounts flooded in from Zimbabwe's second city, Bulawayo,
the eastern border town of Mutare, the western tourist centre Victoria
Falls, the central mining and industrial centres of Gweru and Kwekwe
and the southern gateway to South Africa, Beitbridge. Across the
country, bulldozers. pushed down brick houses and wooden cottages.
Flamethrowers were used in some areas and sledgehammers in others.
The task was
so huge that officials ordered people, at gunpoint, to tear down
their own homes, using hammers. Others were told that, if bulldozers
were used, homeowner would have to pay for each room that was levelled.
Adding insult to injury, the Mugabe Government called. the campaign
Operation Murambatsvina - 'drive out filth' in the Shona
language.
Life was already
tough for Zimbabwe's urban poor who are battling unemployment at
80 per cent, inflation near 300 per cent, widespread shortages of
basic foods and fuel and declining schools and health services.
The housing demolitions have made things much worse.
Although the
scale of Zimbabwe's demolitions place them in a category of their
own, forced evictions - and the human rights violations that go
with them - are a growing problem in Africa. `The common factor
[ln Africa] is the growing tendency to undertake and justify forced
evictions for 'development" purposes', points out Jean du Plessis,
co-ordinator for the Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions
(COHRE). 'The tragic outcome in most of these cases is that the
poorest and most vulnerable members of society are placed at even
greater risk’
According to
COHRE's summary of evictions in Africa from 2000 to 2005,
Zimbabwe was the worst offender, with an estimated 2.4 million people
affected. Nigeria has been a serial offender. 'Nigeria
has earned a reputation as one of the world's worst violators of
the right to adequate housing,' states the COHRE report. Nigeria's
most extreme case was the mass eviction, in 2000, which affected
1.2 million people from Rainbow Town, Port Harcourt.
The Kenyan Government has evicted an estimated 80,000 people
from their homes since 2000. 'In Kenya's experience, slum dwellers
would move only when they saw a government bulldozer,' said Kenyan
Housing Minister Amos Kimunya, expressing sympathy with those carrying
out the Zimbabwean evictions. Most have been evictions from the
Sururu and Mau forests, where the Government claims it is protecting
water catchment areas for Lake Nakuru. But environmental groups
charge that the commercial logging of the forests is far more damaging.
Sudan and the Democratic Republic of Congo have
also carried out major forced evictions since 2000.
On the bright
side, a group in Kenya averted evictions through court
actions and negotiation. In Ghana, two planned evictions
in the capital, Accra, are being challenged. Since 2002 Ghanaian
officials have planned to clear hundreds of homes from the Old
Fadama settlement, claiming that the area needed to be cleared
to improve the environment of the Korle Lagoon. Residents and the
People's Dialogue on Human Settlements have legally challenged
the evictions and have voluntarily improved Old Fadama's access
roads, drainage and refuse collection to minimize damage to the
lagoon. But those signs of progress, hailed by housing rights activists,
were eclipsed by Zimbabwe's big step backwards. Since the Zimbabwe
demolitions, there have been new reports of planned evictions in
Malawi, Kenya and South Africa, according to COHRE.
The massive
scale of the Zimbabwe demolitions surprised even hardened housing
activists. Although press reports described the homes torn down
as wooden shanties and shacks, many were substantial brick dwellings
with electricity and water. Filmed footage showed bulldozers knocking
down homes as women and children wept amongst their salvaged furniture
and possessions. At least two children and one adult were killed
when walls fell on them. In addition, the forced evictions took
place during Zimbabwe's winter months when night temperatures drop
to near freezing. Thousands of newly homeless huddled together for
warmth amongst their belongings. Before long, deaths due to respiratory
infections were being reported.
President Robert
Mugabe appeared surprised when the international community protested
against his actions. He said the housing demolitions were merely
part of an urban renewal campaign. But, even as he spoke, families
were being herded on to trucks that took them to holding camps outside
the cities or into the rural areas listed on their national identity:
cards. Old Rhodesian-era documentation provided for the rural home
of a person's parents or grandparents to be listed and that is where
thousands were taken, even though many had no surviving relatives.
'Everyone comes from somewhere; no-one comes from nowhere: said
Edmore Veterai, assistant police commissioner commanding Harare.
As reports grew
of the suffering caused by the demolitions, UN Secretary-General
Kofi Annan acted decisively. He appointed Anna Tibaijuka, head of
the UN's housing agency, Habitat, and the highest ranking
African woman in the UN administration, to investigate the situation
and report back to him. Her report, presented to Annan on 22 July
this year; was a scathing indictment of the housing campaign. In
total 700,000 Zimbabweans lost their homes or source of livelihood
or both, reported Tibaijuka; and 2.4 million people were directly
affected. She accused the Government of callous 'indifference to
human suffering' and recommended perpetrators be charged.
The Mugabe Government
refused to budge and the UN launched a $30 million appeal on its
own in September this year to provide food, water, temporary shelter
and blankets to the most vulnerable. Meanwhile the Government continued
its campaign against the cities' poor. In Bulawayo police raided
nine churches, rounding up about 600 people who had been sheltering
in the places of worship.
They, too, were
taken to a holding camp outside the city.
There is now
considerable speculation about why the Mugabe Government has carried
out these demolitions and evictions. Few if any accept Mugabe's
claims that he simply desired to improve Zimbabwe's cities. Only
a small number of new homes can be seen under construction and they
are allocated to staunch loyalists of the ruling party, ZANU- PF.
Likewise new vending licences are being granted to party stalwarts.
More credence
is given to the theory that Mugabe wanted to assert more control
over the cities. These areas have voted consistently against Mugabe
since the 2000 elections, in which the opposition won urban seats
by margins of 80 per cent. Urban opposition to Mugabe has also extended
to his Government's attempts to control prices; city residents have
ignored the price controls. Staples unavailable at the fixed prices
in the shops - ranging from maize meal and cooking oil to toothpaste
- were being sold on the street at higher prices.
The street vendors were only following the basic economic law of
supply and demand. Nevertheless the Mugabe Government branded them
criminals. It deluded itself that it would stamp out the illegal
market in foreign currency by tearing down the soapbox stalls of
street traders. Instead, the trade in foreign exchange continued
to thrive, going deeper underground.
By evicting
large numbers in every Zimbabwean city, Mugabe was giving the message
loud and clear that black Zimbabweans could only live in the cities
with the approval of his Government. Ironically, it mirrors the
old Rhodesian pass laws, under which blacks were only allowed to
live in the cities if they had official documents to permit it.
Zimbabwean analysts say that Operation Murambatsvina was
a pre-emptive strike against a possible township revolt.
They have been surprised that their line has also been adopted by
The Herald newspaper, which is tightly controlled by the
Government.
An article in
The Herald, reprinted from the New African magazine
and written by Balfour Ankomah, said that Mugabe's secret police,
the Central Intelligence Organization warned the President
that Western agents hoped to instigate mass demonstrations similar
to those in Ukraine to force a change in Government. As a consequence,
the CIO convinced Mr Mugabe to 'nip the danger in the bud by dispersing
the slum dwellers via the demolition of their habitats, wrote Ankomah.
Whether as a means of political repression or as a blunt means of
urban planning, forced evictions will continue to be a problem for
Africa's poor. Systems that uphold the legal rights of all citizens,
even poor slum dwellers, are needed to combat evictions. 'African
governments must make housing a priority,' said Mawuse Apyidoho,
co-ordinator of COHRE's Africa programme. 'Leaders must
have the political will to address the issues that lead to the proliferation
of slums, rather than just bulldozing them when they become an eyesore.'
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|