| |
Back to Index
State-sponsored homophobia spreading HIV
PlusNews
May 15, 2007
http://www.plusnews.org/Report.aspx?ReportId=72132
The legalisation of
same-sex marriages in South Africa in 2006 was expected to speed
up the liberation of gays and lesbians in neighbouring countries
like Zimbabwe and Namibia, where homosexuality is still illegal,
but international and local experts believe the battle for recognition
in Africa is far from over.
Researchers, community
leaders and activists who were part of a recent international delegation
to a three-day conference on lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender
(LGBT) people and HIV/AIDS, in Pretoria, South Africa, voiced their
concerns about the risks posed by one-sided health programmes and
HIV prevention campaigns in Africa.
This is what they told
IRIN/PlusNews:
"Discriminatory
rule in countries like Zimbabwe, Nigeria, Cameroon and Kenya is
an ongoing ... and LGBT people who live under laws that criminalise
same-sex activity are often excluded from national healthcare programmes
and HIV prevention campaigns. Some donor organisations also condone
this blatant human rights violation of LGBT communities through
unclear policies on how their funds should be spent. Take PEPFAR
[the multibillion dollar United States President's Emergency Fund
for AIDS Relief] in Ghana, for instance, and how it covers the purchase
of condoms but not the purchase of water-based lubrication necessary
for condoms not to break during anal intercourse," said Carey
Alan Johnson, International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission
senior specialist on Africa.
"Access to healthcare
for LGBT communities, people with disabilities and other sexual
minority groups, like commercial sex workers in Namibia, remains
a major issue. The attitude of the Namibian government was certainly
demonstrated recently when, after many months of working on the
third medium-term plan [part of the national strategy for addressing
HIV and AIDS], The Rainbow Project managed, for the first time,
to get in a clause on the health needs of sexual minorities in national
programming, but this clause was thrown out during the review of
the document in parliament. It's very sad, because there is growing
evidence to support earlier fears that national health interventions
run the risk of failure if ... [they] continue to exclude people
based on sexual identity," commented Ian Schwartz, the director
of Namibia's gay rights group, The Rainbow Project.
"Homosexuals as
well as heterosexuals are left more vulnerable to HIV infection
as a result of the attitudes of governments to LGBT people on the
[African] continent. Persecution of gays and lesbians is also rife
in Africa, and just because it does not hit the press ... [people
think] it is not happening, but one experience is one too many,
and often illustrates how far LGBT people will go to blend in or
even operate on the 'down-low', where people who desire same-sex
intimacy are forced to commit to false heterosexual marriages to
conceal their sexual identities, often with dire consequences. Issues
of same-sex sexuality and HIV/AIDS are absent from national debate
and, if not explored, threaten to reverse the gains of national
and even global health programming," noted Prof Vasu Reddy,
chief research specialist at the Gender and Development Unit of
South Africa's Human Sciences Research Council.
Among other
things, Johnson, Schwartz and Reddy have called for the urgent repeal
of conservative donor conditions as well as laws that criminalise
same-sex sexuality.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|