THE NGO NETWORK ALLIANCE PROJECT - an online community for Zimbabwean activists  
 View archive by sector
 
 
    HOME THE PROJECT DIRECTORYJOINARCHIVESEARCH E:ACTIVISMBLOGSMSFREEDOM FONELINKS CONTACT US
 

 


Back to Index

Early departures: The emigration potential of Zimbabwean students
Southern African Migration Project (SAMP)
Extracted from Migration Policy Series No. 39
2005

http://www.queensu.ca/samp/forms/form.html

To apply to download this document
- http://www.queensu.ca/samp/forms/form.html. Acrobat PDF file size is (118
KB).
If you do not have the free Acrobat reader on your computer, download it from the Adobe website by clicking here.

Executive summary
Zimbabwe is experiencing a crippling flight of professional and skilled people that has escalated to levels that have serious implications for economic growth and development. Previous studies have discovered extremely high levels of dissatisfaction amongst professionals with the cost of living, taxation, availability of goods, and salaries. Unhappiness goes deeper than economic circumstances to include housing, medical services, education and a viable future for children. There is an urgent need for policies to curb the massive brain drain and offer incentives to make staying and working in the country attractive for professionals and skilled people. Policy-makers also need to be able to predict the size and direction of future flows of professional and skilled emigrants.

In an effort to try and understand the future course of the brain drain, the Southern African Migration Project (SAMP) carried out a survey of final-year college and university students in Zimbabwe. The survey aimed to obtain information on the demographic profile of the student body; their attitudes towards national issues and government policies; satisfaction and expectations about economic conditions and about the future; likelihood of leaving after graduation; reasons for moving; most likely destinations; perceived conditions in the most likely destination; and length of stay in the most likely destination. Answers to questions were analysed by gender, age, rural/urban background and other variables.

The university students were from faculties of Law, Science, Engineering, Commerce, Medicine/Pharmacy and Arts/Humanities. The colleges included technical, commercial and teacher training institutions located in several urban centres. A total of 1,192 questionnaires were administered in Harare, Bulawayo, Gweru or Masvingo. The students came from all over the country including some of the more remote rural areas.

The survey first looked at student attitudes towards Zimbabwe and found that:

  • Almost 60% of the students said they were proud to be called Zimbabweans; a high proportion but lower than in every other SADC country tested. A similar number agreed that being a citizen of Zimbabwe was a very important part of how they see themselves (high but again low in the regional context). There is also a strong desire among students to help build their nation. As many as 78% of the students felt it was their ‘duty’ to contribute their talents and skills to the growth of their country.
  • Levels of student dissatisfaction about economic conditions are higher than in any other SADC country surveyed. Only 3% were satisfied with their personal economic conditions and less than 35% were optimistic that things would improve in the next five years. Less than one per cent were satisfied with current national economic conditions and only 20% expected to see any improvement five years hence. Only 20% were optimistic that the cost of living would be better in the future. Just 25% felt that their incomes would improve in the future. Only 20% felt that they would be able to get the job they want, while just 21% were optimistic that job security would improve in the future. The prospects for professional advancement were seen as slim and the hopes for fair taxation low. Very few felt government was doing enough to create employment opportunities for graduates.
  • Perceptions of other quality of life measures were similarly negative. Only 14% said their ability to find the house they wanted would improve in the future; only 19% thought medical services would get better and only 21% were optimistic about their ability to find a good school for their children. A mere 18% felt that their personal and family’s safety would improve in the future and just 19% were optimistic that the future of children would get better. Very few of the students expected the quality upkeep of public amenities, the availability of quality affordable products and customer care to improve. Only 11% felt that the HIV/AIDS situation would improve.

Given the prevailing pessimism, it is not surprising that leaving the countr y after graduation is at the forefront of many student minds. Nearly three quarters of the students indicated that they had given the matter of leaving a great deal of consideration. Gender, age and socioeconomic status made little dif ference to the answer. Only 6% of the students had not considered moving abroad. Just over half (56%) said that they were likely to emigrate within six months of graduating. Some 70% said it was likely they would have left the country within two years. Over a quarter of students had already applied for or were in the process of applying for a work permit in another country. Around 15% had applied for or were in the process of applying for permanent residence in another country. A similar proportion were seeking citizenship of another country.

Southern Africa is the preferred destination for 36% of the students, followed by Europe (29%), and North America (24%). Less than one per cent listed the rest of Africa as their preferred destination. Students are relatively confident of their ability to end up in their preferred destination. Nearly 40% felt it likely they would move within Southern Africa, while 28% and 22% said it was likely they would end up in Europe and North America respectively.

To what extent do family ties and obligations act as brakes on emigration? In many countries, they probably would. Not in contemporary Zimbabwe. An astonishing 77% of students said that they were being encouraged or strongly encouraged to leave the country by their families. Why are families so eager for their offspring to leave? The answer surely lies in the fact that many families need household members to leave and r emit funds, just for survival. Several subsidiary questions therefore arise. Will those who leave do so permanently or on a temporary basis? Once gone will they continue to maintain links with Zimbabwe? And, in particular, will they remit funds once they have left? The survey found the following:

  • In contrast to many students in Southern Africa, Zimbabweans are more inter ested in long-term migration. Around 60% have a great desire to leave for more than two years and 46% said it was very likely that they would do so. Only 12% indicated a preferred stay of less than two years in their most likely destination. As many as half the students said they would stay away for longer than five years, an alarmingly high percentage.
  • Although many of the students said they would want to be permanent residents (60%) and citizens (57%) of their most desirable destination, fewer said they would want to retire there (37%) and fewer still to be buried there (18%). Clearly, although many students would like to leave the country, most see themselves eventually returning home.
  • A large proportion of potential emigrants (83%) anticipatedmaintaining links with Zimbabwe once they had left. Fifty-six percent indicated that they intended to visit either once every few months or yearly, while only 11% said that they would never return. Almost half (46%) would send money home once every month and 16% would send money home a few times a year. Less than 2% would never send money home. A quarter of the students would send money home more than once a month.
  • In terms of maintaining links with home, only 29% of students said they would be willing or very willing to give up their homes in Zimbabwe and a quarter would be willing or very willing to take all their savings out of Zimbabwe. In terms of assets, 24% would want to take all their assets out of the county. Only 26% said they would be willing or very willing to give up their Zimbabwean citizenship. On all four of the measures, more women than men were willing to cut their ties with Zimbabwe.

Students have strong opinions on government policies to stop or control the brain drain. Overwhelmingly, they feel that political measures targeted at individuals will be ineffectual and that government should concentrate instead on fostering economic development and growth. While it is obviously not possible to prevent people from migrating to developed countries for better prospects in this era of globalisation, the adverse impact of such movements on economic development merit urgent attention. The survey showed that a coercive approach to the brain drain would only intensify the level of discontent and for most of the students would make absolutely no difference to their emigration intentions. The best way to curb the high rates of skilled labour migration lies in addressing the economic fundamentals of the country in a way that will ultimately improve living standards.

Download full document

Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.

TOP