Back to Index
Zanu
PF in quandary over proposed demolitions
Caiphas Chimhete,
The Standard (Zimbabwe)
November 10, 2013
http://www.thestandard.co.zw/2013/11/10/zanu-pf-quandary-proposed-demolitions/
Demolitions
of illegal structures by government have been stalled
after some Zanu-PF MPs complained that the move would make the party
unpopular with the electorate, especially soon after
being elected into power.
They warned
that people do not have short memories.
Before the July
31 elections, Zanu-PF MPs encouraged people to illegally construct
houses in exchange for votes.
And indeed the
party, though controversially, won with over two-thirds parliamentary
majority but its electoral promises have come back to haunt them.
Local Government,
Public Works and National Housing minister, Ignatius Chombo recently
warned that all illegal structures would be demolished in an exercise
similar to Operation
Murambatsvina that left about 700 000 people homeless.
But some MPs
warned that the demolitions would affect Zanu-PF’s performance
in the 2018 elections. The party is already preparing to make sure
that the MDC-T, which won
parliamentary dominance in 2008, is completely dislodged from
the national political platform.
“We are
saying if the structures are destroyed how would we go back to the
same people to campaign?” said one MP. “It has been
the party’s strategy to parcel out land to our supporters
in and around towns to neutralise the MDC-T.”
Another MP said
Chombo should find ways to formalise the illegal settlements to
keep the beneficiaries as “captive voters” in the next
elections.
Several slums
with links to Zanu-PF officials have emerged in and around Harare,
Ruwa, Seke and Chitungwiza in the past decade.
Last week, Harare
Metropolitan Province minister, Miriam Chikukwa and Deputy Local
Government Minister Biggie Matiza contradicted each other on the
issue of demolitions.
Chikukwa proposed
a non-confrontational approach to avoid antagonising the people,
while Matiza insisted that houses on wetlands, sewer mains and under
electricity cables must go.
Failure by Zanu-PF
officials to speak with one voice, analysts said, was clear indication
that the party was in a dilemma on how to handle the matter.
Zanu-PF spokesperson,
Rugare Gumbo however, professed ignorance over discord in the party
over the demolitions.
He said the
party did not support haphazard construction of houses.
Rugare said
the issue of demolitions was Chombo’s baby.
“If there
are differences, we will solve them internally and come up with
an agreed and united position,” said Rugare adding, “most
of the illegal structures are a result to the MDC-T officials who
were trying to ‘empower’ their people.”
The MDC-T, which
controlled most urban local authorities around the country, was
accused of corruption during its tenure in the inclusive government.
The party has
however, condemned demolitions, which saw several houses and tuckshops,
demolished in Ruwa last week.
“The party
strongly condemns this callous move by the controversially elected
Zanu-PF government, especially during the rainy season,” said
the party in a statement.” Sadly, this happens at a time when
over 40% of the adult population has no personal residential properties,
while tuckshops have become the only source of income for most residents
who have no jobs.”
The party said
now that the elections are over, Chombo, “who is responsible
for the crisis as he personally issued out residential stands on
undesignated council land for political mileage, wants to dash the
people’s hopes of owning properties”.
The MDC-T said
the government’s action violated the people’s right
to shelter.
The Zimbabwe
Lawyers for Human Rights (ZLHR) has also added its voice condemning
the demolitions.
In a letter
delivered to Chombo last week, ZLHR demanded assurances that they
would follow the dictates of the law in executing the planned evictions
and demolition of property, given the fact that Zimbabwe has entered
a new constitutional dispensation, which provides for the protection
of the basic human rights of the people.
It said Chombo
must comply with the provisions of Section 74 of the new Constitution
which states that: “No person may be evicted from their home,
or have their home demolished, without an order of court made after
considering all the relevant circumstances.”
The lawyers
also demanded that Chombo’s ministry furnishes them with the
total number of households that will be affected. In particular,
how many children will be left without shelter and the duration
of the notice period given to the affected families and persons
and in what form shall the notice be.
Section 28 of
the Constitution states that: “The State and all institutions
and agencies of government at every level must take reasonable legislative
and other measures, within the limits of the resources available
to them, to enable every person to have access to adequate shelter”.
The lawyers
gave Chombo 72 hours “to furnish the required particulars,
failing which ZLHR will take appropriate legal action against the
minister and some responsible authorities.”
Chombo could
not be reached for comment last week.
‘People
should not build new structures’
In Chitungwiza,
Zanu-PF supporters staged a demonstration against the demolition
of illegal structures in the town and even threatened legal action
against the party.
Local Government
minister Ignatius Chombo has said the government would destroy all
illegal structures and that people should not build new structures.
Chombo has since
appointed a task team led by his deputy, Joel Biggie Matiza to investigate
cases of unlawful parcelling out of land by Manyame Rural District
council and Chitungwiza Municipality.
The team will
also seek to verify how people illegally acquired land.
The on-going
evictions and demolitions which evoke memories of June 2005 Operation
Murambatsvina which left over 700 000 people homeless, while several
thousands of children failed to attend school.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|