|
Back to Index
Transcript
of 'Hot Seat' with foreign correspondent Peta Thornycroft -
Part 2
Violet Gonda, SW Radio Africa
November 06, 2007
Read
the first part of this interview with Peta Thornycroft
http://www.swradioafrica.com/pages/hotseat261107.htm
Violet Gonda brings the
final episode of the Hot Seat interview with veteran Zimbabwean
journalist Peta Thornycroft. In the first segment she talked about
her concerns on the way the Zimbabwean media has been covering the
crisis in the country. In this final part the award-winning journalist
gives us her frank assessment of the state of the MDC.
VIOLET:
We welcome journalist Peat Thornycroft on the programme Hot Seat
again. Now Peta when we ended the discussion last week we were talking
about the turmoil in the MDC. What are your thoughts exactly on
what is happening in the MDC right now
THORNYCROFT: Well, I
think one has to really go back to the beginning of the MDC as journalists
and look at how we covered the MDC, certainly how I covered it from
July 2001. I'm afraid to say I was very neglectful of looking at
the MDC. My excuse is that it wasn't such a big foreign story, it
was more of a domestic story - the opposition - but I bitterly regret
that I didn't do more work in finding out about the various fault-lines
in the MDC, which I have subsequently discovered were there right
from the very beginning and I was totally unaware of it. I had no
idea until I think it was July 2005. I had no idea.
And the domestic press,
certainly The Daily News and what else was there apart from the
Daily News? What ever else, what ever other domestic media there
was, also didn't investigate the MDC - almost at all. And because
of the polarization any criticism that appeared in the Herald or
on ZBC I think we all dismissed as propaganda, and that's also a
natural thing that would happen. I saw that happening in South Africa
as well. Nevertheless if we'd been on our toes, a bit smarter and
not so anxious and longing for the end of ZANU PF we would have
and should have seen that the MDC was in trouble almost from the
day it was launched. And so when it split in 2005 it was not a surprise.
I remember I was down in Bulawayo in early October 2005 when I realized
that an actual split was coming and that was because I had interviewed
the Mayor of Bulawayo and I asked him what he would do if the MDC
called for a boycott of Senate elections? And he said to me, 'We'll
have to field independent candidates because we cannot have ZANU
PF taking our space. We down here we have a different experience
of ZANU PF a longer experience of ZANU PF than people in the rest
of the country. We've earned our place, our MPs have earned the
right to be MPs for a long time and we want them to stay. We don't
want ZANU PF to have any position in the whole of Matabeleland particularly
Bulawayo.'
And I remember
thinking to myself 'oh oh, this is a tricky situation,' because
in Harare we knew that people were so against the senate elections,
participating in the senate elections. So clearly there had been
inadequate consultation within the MDC. I reported that only I think
for V.O.A because quite frankly the other newspapers were not, you
know it was again a very domestic story, very domestic story. Then
we came across the violence in the MDC. I found that out in July
2005 and it wasn't particularly nasty, dreadful life threatening
violence but it was completely against the public perception that
the MDC had put-over of itself as being almost Gambian in its passive
resistance and its pursuit of democracy using only peaceful means.
Not only was this violence violence but it was also against its
own members and I found that deeply shocking. I then discovered
that this has been going on and that the first violence, I found
out, was in 2001. So now we come to a situation of 2005 and then
the party split, dreadful accusations went on - most of the accusations
were made against the Mutambara faction although it wasn't called
that faction at the time it split - It seemed to have been loaded
against the then Secretary General Welshman Ncube. I was told by
senior members of the party he had a farm here, a farm here, he
had a supermarket there he had a shopping mall there, he had this
and that. So I went and investigated it and wrote the story in the
South African press about the farm which they seemed to just ignore,
fair enough. But all of this venom that I was getting from the Tsvangirai
faction was aimed at Welshman Ncube. To this day I keep on saying
to myself, have I missed something? Have I missed something? What
has he done? What has he done? But still I keep on wondering if
I just missed something. It seems to me that now there's terrible
anguish against ehm em em em.
VIOLET:
Lucia Mativenga?
THORNYCROFT: The new
secretary general, what's his name?
VIOLET:
Tendai Biti.
THORNYCROFT: Tendai Biti
is in deep problems now. And I can tell you this from Johannesburg
that there's huge turmoil in the MDC in Johannesburg. I think they
are reacting to Tendai Biti because they are looking to him for
money. The MDC is a source of some kind of employment and resources
over the last seven years when there had been no jobs and no resources.
So the MDC is one of the few ways that people can get some money
in the bank. So it's a job, it's a resource. As it is for the MPs
- they've got jobs and clearly what we're seeing now is this jockeying
for positions ahead of the elections next year. It's about jobs.
It's not about ideology, it's about jobs and I think that's the
shock to us. Perhaps we were just naive.
VIOLET:
So Peta what exactly are you saying here? Are you saying
the MDC got it wrong and that the opposition party is not the party
that people thought it was?
THORNYCROFT: I wonder
if we ever knew what it was. We just accepted it, didn't we? I wasn't
there in 2000, I went to one of its rallies in 2000 and I came in
July 2001 and I think I just accepted that the MDC had been cheated
at the elections and that this was a party that had the majority
support in the country and it was only long afterwards that I discovered
that in fact of course ZANU PF had enormous support in certain rural
parts of the country. I first saw that demonstrated to me in the
March elections of 2005, I was actually astonished by that and it
is in my copy. I then saw it again demonstrated in the Budiriro
by-election when 4 000 people continued to vote for ZANU PF and
it was quite a peaceful by election. They were just as short of
fuel, water and electricity as all the other people in Budiriro.
And I think that I realized that I hadn't taken into consideration
that ZANU PF was an old established party, which despite its appalling
lack of democracy and its top down style of doing business - because
of the liberation struggle and the propaganda it's been able to
feed everyone - it does genuinely have support. And that the MDC
as the farm workers disappeared and as the farmers disappeared a
great chunk of its support went with it. I think that was important
and I think that we didn't see it and we didn't sort of realize
it at the time, I didn't realize it at the time. So when the break
came (the split), I mean it was deeply shocking, it was amazing,
it was amazing when the Tsvangirai faction seemed to think that
it was a triumph and not an absolute shattering disaster from which
they would probably never recover . I'm sure the MDC will never
recover that from that split.
VIOLET:
From the October 12 2005 split?
THORNYCROFT: Yah yah,
I mean wow it has been..
VIOLET:
Do you think what is happening now is linked to the troubles
in the MDC that erupted on October 12 2005?
THORNYCROFT: Of course
it is, of course it is and it's also connected with the poverty
in Zimbabwe that people are desperate for jobs and desperate for
resources. The MDC does get funding from all sort of quarters. Let's
face it, if you going to go to a rally you used to get money. I
have seen it being handed out. People got money to just go to rallies,
they get money. I'm not saying its paid participation, they might
be organizing, putting flowers or whatever it is but an MDC political
event provides resources.
And an MDC job as an
MP - however poorly paid the MPs are - it's cheap fuel, it's a new
car every five years, its very low forex rates. Yes there are great
advantages in life being an opposition MP. And that's why there's
this fight over why they can't get the corporation agreement between
the two factions of the MDC to work because it's about jobs.
And I'm afraid to say
that there was an agreement in April and I saw the agreement. Tragically
it didn't translate into an effective agreement in May when Sam
Nkomo was sent in to renegotiate the terms of it. And so it fell
aside. So we are going to have a situation as far as I can see that
certainly in some key constituencies you are going to have MDC from
both factions standing against each other in the elections, dividing
the votes and handing victory in that constituency to ZANU PF.
In Johannesburg here
I tell you what is going on - and there is a huge number of MDC
people here. There's a fight going on here that one lot of MDC supporters
says Morgan Tsvangirai and Roy Bennet have to go, Roy Bennet being
the National Treasurer and Tendai Biti has to go as well. In their
place they want Tapiwa Mashakada and as President of the MDC this
faction is saying they want (Lovemore) Madhuku in Morgan's place.
It's very serious here in Johannesburg and they are complaining
about Biti saying, 'he's just as bad as Welshman Ncube was when
he was Secretary General and he's keeping all the money.' You know
if one suspected that Ncube was short of money when he was Secretary
General and so is Biti short of money. But this is now translating
itself into Johannesburg.
If the stories coming
out of London in the MDC are true (infighting), although I have
no experience of what's going on in London and what is happening
with the MDC Women's assembly. I think you have to look at that
party and say my God what is that party? What is it - just a few
months before the elections?
VIOLET:
It's really sad that things have come to this because at the end
of the day it's the ordinary people that are suffering and they
really do not deserve this confusion that is happening in the pro-democracy
movement. But on the other hand some may say Mugabe has skillfully
dragged this crisis on for the last seven years, for too long. To
some extent when things go wrong in the opposition it seems people
forget the problems created by the regime.
Now do you
think people have considered these other risks? That the regime
is armed, it has torcher chambers against an opposition which does
not even have a military wing. What can you say about this?
THORNYCROFT: No I think
that the MDC is being absolutely tormented; we've seen it with our
eyes. We have seen it before the 2002 presidential elections in
particular it has been tormented. Whatever rural structures or peri-urban
structures it set up were destroyed. We saw its urban structures
being destroyed in April 2007, we saw that. We were there and we
witnessed it and we wrote about it and ZANU PF has all the power
but there does seem to me, and I don't know how you'd quantify this
- a failure across the top echelons of the MDC of those people who
are prepared to actually take risks and they have to take risks.
So why aren't they when there's now some little spotlight on the
country because of the on going negotiations? Where are they in
Mashonaland West, Central - the three Mashonaland provinces? And
I go on and on about this and I was there just a few weeks ago,
driving there with a very good cover and nobody knew I was a journalist
and I was able to speak to people and they were very open and chatty
with me. I mean the MDC just hasn't tried to go into most of those
places. And will they ever or are they going to just remain an urban
party you know an urban party in Harare, some in Manicaland.
VIOLET:
(interrupts) But isn't it a fact that some of these rural
constituencies are no go areas for the MDC so.
THORNYCROFT: (interrupts)
I want to see them, I want to know that it's still a no go area.
You know I need to know that they have tried to go there and that
they got chased away. And there are still enough reporters on the
ground in Harare, and we've all got quite skilled at doing this
so that we can be witness to that. And if it is really that they
can't go into Mash West or Mash Central and parts of Mash East -
into those big rural areas and the communal areas - if they can't
go there then we need to be writing about that.
VIOLET:
And you know Peta, politics aside, is the Lucia Mativenga issue
central to the politics of gender in the country? I mean should
this be viewed as part of the patriarchal system alluded to by some
of the women in the MDC like Sekai Holland and Grace Kwinjeh?
THORNYCROFT: I think
it would, the MDC is still a very young party. I mean seven/eight
years old. It was inevitable that there were going to be splits,
strains etcetera. I actually think whatever is happening in the
Women's Assembly, in the fight between Lucia Mativenga and Teresa
Makoni is probably duplicated in other political parties everywhere
around the world especially in their infancies. The problem is that
Zimbabwe is in a particular fix at the moment that it's facing crucial
elections next year. Perhaps under a new constitution, which may
deliver what Mugabe is desperately hoping for, which is free and
fair elections, genuinely free and fair elections because the MDC
is so weak.
And so there are demands
on the MDC to be at its very best - to fight the election not as
two factions but as together to try and fix these internal problems
that they are having or avoid them, suspend these problems until
after the elections because there is this moment in time. I don't
think that these eruptions that are going on are particularly significant
because they happen in all parties as they are starting up. They
haven't yet got the mechanisms in place to deal with them in an
emergency.
I think one of the sad
things we saw over the negotiations in South Africa that was clear
to me - was that whereas the Mutambabra faction was able to understand
what was going on with the 18th Constitutional Amendment - somebody,
or whoever was responsible for explaining it to Morgan and his people
didn't get around to it until the last minute and there was a lot
of misunderstanding and of course a lot of misunderstanding by the
civics. And you know I had to say to the civics, why was there a
misunderstanding, why didn't they bother to go and find out, what
did they want, do you need an invitation to find out what was happening?
Why where they just hanging about and not making it their business
to know every little bit that was going on in the negotiations so
they could see the 18th Constitutional Amendment for what it was
which may be quite different to the way they reported it or had
analyzed it.
VIOLET:
(interrupts) But I think to be fair it has been quite difficult.
THORNYCROFT: I think
the MDC's had a hard time Violet, I really think it's had a hard
time.
VIOLET:
Is there a trend , sorry to go back to this particular issue, is
there a trend, is there an issue regarding women and politics in
Zimbabwe because if you go by the reports that we are seeing some
women have come out complaining about these problems . Is there
a trend regarding women and politics in Zimbabwe.
THORNYCROFT: I don't
know. I absolutely have no idea. I think that's a question that
really needs to be given to Zimbabwe's journalists who are reporting
it in a domestic way and who know the MDC much better than I do.
As I say I only got into really reporting the intricacies in the
MDC almost by default because it's not really a foreign story. The
MDC is only a foreign story if Morgan gets tortured or if they win
all these elections. The actual fighting and infighting within the
MDC is largely not a foreign story but unfortunately it wasn't covered
well by the domestic press in the early days. It's much better now.
We get much more information now than we used to. I think you need
to ask them I mean I've read what you've read about the lack of
women representation in the MDC. I don't know if it's true or not.
I just simply don't know.
VIOLET:
Peta let's move on to ZANU PF. We hear there's infighting
in ZANU PF but there's no evidence of this, and there's still no
indication of where ZANU PF is going. What are your thoughts on
this?
THORNYCROFT: I think
there are indicators that they are fighting. I mean I think they've
been good reports I think in The Independent newspaper and elsewhere
about the extremely tumultuous politburo meetings. We have a situation
where a former prominent banker James Mushore who fled the country
and would not have come back into Zimbabwe without believing that
he can face up to the allegations against him without ending up
in the slammer.
He's still waiting to
be freed and he happens to be a relative of retired army general
Solomon Mujuru in the Mujuru camp. This is part of the successive
struggle and I think we now got a situation where we we must all
pretty much expect that Mugabe is going to be the ZANU PF candidate
to stand next year and that he's going to serve a full term in office
for five years. And so he's managed to crush, it would seem to me,
those in the Mujuru faction and perhaps those who might have supported
say Gideon Gono as the Prime Minister. We've heard a lot about that
or even Simba Makoni as the Prime Minister, which would have gone
down well in the world. Those seem to have gone.
It seems to me that Mugabe
has managed to finally bring a fractured ZANU PF under his wing
with, once again, excluding the voice from the floors. This fracture
within ZANU PF is a fracture at the top not a fracture at the bottom.
ZANU PF has long been a party of the chefs not the people. Whereas
I would think that MDC some of its problems is actually the people
who are looking for jobs are a lot more involved in their party
than the people in ZANU PF are involved at the lower level in their
party. ZANU PF is just a joke of a party.
One of the tragedies
I think in the negotiations facilitated by the South Africans is
that they have not ever understood the nature of ZANU PF. It's thought
of, I imagine, the South Africans think that ZANU PF is sought of
like the ANC perhaps not quite like the ANC but after all it fought
the liberation war. But it's completely a different type of party.
And ZANU PF has always been run on fear right from the beginning,
certainly since in
1980 and people tell me even before then when you think of what
happened to people being looked up in Mozambique during the struggle.
That it's been dominated by one man for over thirty years and he's
going to carry on for another five years. Regardless, that some
of the better informed and the more literate, economically literate
members of ZANU PF sit in the Mujuru faction. I think we have overwhelming
evidence that ZANU PF has been incredibly divided. That even though
Mugabe is going to be endorsed as the candidate that he is going
to be endorsed with a lot of the senior members of ZANU PF being
extremely unhappy, that they could not find a solution to Mugabe,
an alternative to Mugabe being the ZANU PF candidate.
VIOLET:
A couple of weeks ago I interviewed Professor Jonathan
Moyo on this issue and he also spoke about the Third Way. Now newspaper
publisher Trevor Ncube also talked about this so called alternative
movement that will bring together you know elements from ZANU PF,
the MDC and civil society. Does it sound like a viable option to
you?
THORNYCROFT: I read it
too and I wondered who the moderate members are of ZANU PF. I understand
that Trevor Ncube was asked that question in London when he made
that speech. I think to the Oppenheimer Society and he mentioned
Emmerson Mnangagwa being a moderate member. I can't see any Third
Way happening because I think that people like Munangagwa know that
they just have to hang on, it will only be just five years and then
he will take over from Mugabe and unless the Mujuru faction joined
up with Trevor Ncube - I think Ncube himself sees a role for himself,
perhaps with some from the MDC. He made that remark about 6 weeks
ago and I haven't heard of anything happening since then. Not any
discussions other than discussions of what he said. I think it's
too late ahead of these elections for any Third Way.
VIOLET:
On the issue of elections, it seems there's a crisis in
the MDC; no one really knows what is happening in ZANU PF - as you
say Mugabe will probably stand again; there's this talk of the Third
Way -although at present it's not even known who's behind this and
who the actual leaders are. Now elections are around the corner
do Zimbabweans have a bleak choice at the polls?
THORNYCROFT: Say that
again do Zimbabweans ..?
VIOLET:
Have a bleak choice at the elections, at the polls?
THORNYCROFT: An enormously
bleak choice and I think it's terribly bleak. We don't yet know
what kind of elections we going to have. We know they are going
to be Westminster-style elections and I think anyone who has seen
what proportional representation has done for diversity in South
Africa's parliament will be very sad that the winner takes all solution
could not win the day. That Tendai Biti and Welshman Ncube could
not win that round. We still don't know what the electoral laws
are going to look like. They're about a month behind in their negotiations
not because of any crook-ery, I think because Biti had to go overseas
for something, ZANU PF had to do something, and then Welshman Ncube
had to go somewhere and then there was some holidays and there's
some visits and now of course we've got the tragedy of Patrick Chinamasa
- one of the ZANU PF negotiators' son having died in America. And
so I think they're about a month behind. That would take us then;
we're talking about now nearly the middle of December before we
can expect points one to four. Points one to four being the legal
requirements for new laws for elections and in that time we have
then got the ZANU PF extraordinary congress.
So unless ZANU PF agreed
to delay the elections so that if there are reforms people can get
confident that these reforms will work. Its going to be very shoddy
isn't it, it's very shoddy. They may even have it all down on paper
but not any time to get used to it.
And they've got a terribly
bleak choice haven't they? I mean they've got the same old guy whose
led them into poverty, who allowed the country to be dismantled.
We've seen the best and the brightest of all flee Zimbabwe for better
pastures and I doubt whether any of those will come back. And they've
got a country that is a wreck, literally a wreck! That is what there
is to show for 28 years of ZANU PF rule.
But on the other hand
you've got these two MDC parties which, one of the factions is fighting
with itself, and the other faction seems to only operate in Bulawayo
or in Matabeleland. I keep on getting notes saying that they are
down to Insiza etc etc. I'm sure they would do very well in Matabeleland
but I haven't seen Arthur Mutambabra hanging about in Rafingora
either and I'm wondering when he's going to make it and it would
be nice to see Welshman Ncube in Mashonaland West too. I just think
they all going to concentrate on their familiar stamping ground
so that they can keep the positions they already have. So that they
don't lose more seats because these seats are jobs they see themselves
as an opposition party now and not a party that's there to win any
national elections that's what it has got to. I feel, I wonder if
Zimbabweans would be bothered to vote. Would you really be bothered
to vote when the choice is so bleak? I can't imagine it.
VIOLET:
It's a difficult one. Finally Peta do you think the West has made
a huge mistake where Zimbabwe is concerned? If so how?
THORNYCROFT: Well (pause)
I think there are two ways: I think when the MDC started in 2000,
what a pity that they where addressing people in Sandton mostly
white people in Sandton north of Johannesburg instead of being in
Dar es Salaam or Ghana or Abuja. They failed to make contact with
Africa for so long, they were in London, we've just seen it again,
Morgan Tsvangirai's just been in America. Why isn't he in Cairo?
Maybe he needs financial support and he can't get it outside of
America or the UK and the same would go for Mutambara. They have
not done enough in Africa and that was also one of the reasons for
the split, I must say, as those reasons emerged. Please remind me
of your question again.
VIOLET:
The International community, you know what about..
THORNYCROFT: The international
community, you then had Tony Blair in about
2004 making a dreadful statement about how he's working with the
MDC, when he must have known that would feed into, that would be
absolutely marvelous for ZANU PF. And you saw the State Department
in America say it was working with the MDC.
Yeah it wasn't particularly
helpful but actually I think the West at least fed Zimbabwe. Thank
God they provided the food for Zimbabweans. There is not going to
be an Ethiopia-type situation. Zimbabwe is not particularly hot
story apart from inflation and I think it's a symbolic thing for
the British. Zimbabwe was a colony - there was the Rhodesian war.
There is a kith and kin element in it, whether we like it or not
there is a kith and kin element in it. I think Claire Short made
a terrible mistake in 1997 when the Labour party came to power and
that letter she wrote to Zimbabwe saying; 'Land in Zimbabwe has
never been part of our problem.' Of course it has been.
And so they have withdrawn,
the West have withdrawn haven't they? Gordon Brown is going to be
exiled from his own continent in December, he has to stay in London.
He can't even go for the two hour flight from London to Lisbon because
he's got himself into a corner saying he won't go there when Mugabe
is there. Somehow those are battles that were okay, but I think
it's become a domestic issue for Gordon Brown, it affects his votes
and it's got nothing to do with the reality of Zimbabwe.
And the West is obviously
simply hypocritical. It depends on if you have got oil and you haven't
got oil, how your foreign policy is handled. I think the West is
an ex-player in the Zimbabwe situation. And if there ever is a solution
it has to come out of Africa and one doesn't have great hopes over
that. One doesn't have great hopes over the South African foreign
policy successes, so far they've had very few. One would hope that
that this time they'll do better.
There are five points
on the agenda for the negotiations. The first four are legal points,
the fifth point is the political climate. Will Mbeki deliver on
that? Because that's going to be up to him to deliver. If they really
get a new constitution or new electoral laws through parliament
in the first week of January, will Mbeki have the guts to stand
up and say to Mugabe; 'we can't possibly have elections in March,
we have to delay these elections until June and if you don't then
I'm afraid SADC is not going to support you.' Are we going to see
that? Those are great unknowns. I mean how we can possibly have
an election like we had in 2002 and the voters roll in 2005?
For a start for example
I've been cut off the voter's roll. There are a lot of people like
me. For no reason my name's just been taken off.
VIOLET:
Even though you're a Zimbabwean citizen?
THORNYCROFT: Yah, I'm
a Zimbabwean citizen absolutely.
VIOLET:
Well I guess the struggle continues and we'll just have
to wait and see what happens now in Zimbabwe. Thank you very much
Peta Thornycroft.
THORNYCROFT: Okay Violet
thank you.
Comments and
feedback can be emailed to violet@swradioafrica.com
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|