|
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
Marange, Chiadzwa and other diamond fields and the Kimberley Process - Index of articles
Marange
diamond fields in Zimbabwe: Zanu–PF’s enrichment project
Benard
Chiketo, New Times Africa
January 13, 2013
http://www.newstimeafrica.com/archives/30369
Zimbabwe’s
Marange diamond
mining fields are being governed by a predatory Zanu-PF elite
using its access to state power to enrich itself, against the interests
of the people as a whole, acting in collusion with the mining companies.
At least this
is South Africa’s former President, Thabo Mbeki confessed
fear during Zimbabwe’s Diamond Conference in Victoria Falls
early last November.
“The country’s
political leadership, including all parties which serve in the current
Inclusive
Government established because of the GPA (Global
Political Agreement), must absolutely ensure that the diamond
mining industry is not governed by a predatory elite which uses
its access to state power to enrich itself, against the interests
of the people as a whole, acting in collusion with the mining companies,”
Mbeki advised.
For Finance
Minister, Tendai Biti, who is Movement for Democratic Change (MDC-T)
Secretary General the reality could even be worse! Revenue accruing
from Marange fields is essentially unknown amid fears that it could
as well be evading treasury to fund a ‘parallel government’
under President Robert Mugabe’s Zanu-PF party.
“There
are challenges of opaqueness. As Ministry of Finance, we fear that
there might be a parallel government in respect of where the revenue
is going and not coming to Treasury. This economy needs every resource
it can get including diamond revenue,” Biti had said earlier
in the year.
Tafadzwa Musarara,
Resources Exploitation Watch Director, a pro-Zanu-PF civic organisation
told a Centre for Natural Resource Governance (CNRG) convened diamond
conference held in Harare late in November that mining firms were
protected by law not make public their balance sheets as they were
registered as private limited companies hence the nation had no
reason to complain of any ‘opaqueness’.
Musarara further
noted that Treasury ought to be more realistic in its expectations
of revenue flow from Marange saying the firms were still recuperating
their infrastructural investments adding that the firms must even
be commended for their current contributions.
Presenting his
Mid-Term Fiscal policy
in July, Biti again blamed poor revenue inflows from diamonds from
the Marange fields noting that of US$600 million he had expected
from diamond sales this year, only US$41, 6 million had been received
during the first half of the year, forcing him to cut his 2012 national
budget from US$4 billion to US$3, 4 billion.
Biti even protests
that due process was not followed in awarding the concession prejudicing
the country of millions of dollars and has been pushing for the
cancellation of all existing claims through a Diamond Control Revenue
Bill of 2011 which seeks to place the fields under the joint supervision
of the finance and mining ministries.
Section 4 (1)
(a) of the draft Bill states: “Any mineral right, which was
in force under the Mines Act immediately before the fixed date (date
of commencement of Act) and which authorised the grantee or holder
to prospect for additionally, or alternatively, to mine or work
any alluvial deposit of diamonds, shall, to the extent of such authorisation,
be void.” Section 6 (4) (b) of the Bill adds that “The
minister, with the approval of the minister responsible for mines,
may, by written notice to the (claim) holder, fix appropriate terms
and conditions subject to which mining operations may continue on
the holder’s mining location.”
Zimbabwe Mining
Development Corporation (ZMDC) owns the 80,000 hectares diamond
fields which geologists estimate to contain two to seven billion
carats of raw diamonds and currently contributing up to 25 per cent
of the global diamond output.
While ZMDC wholly
owns Marange Resources Ltd it has 50 - 50 joint ventures foreigners
in the other three companies - Diamond Mining Corporation (DMC),
Mbada Diamonds and Anjin Investments. According to human rights
group, Global
Witness, Mbada Diamonds’ board is chaired by Zimbabwe’s
former Air Vice Marshall Robert Mhlanga while Anjin Investments,
is a joint venture between a little-known Zimbabwean company, Matt
Bronze, and a Chinese construction company. Anjin’s board
also Zimbabwe’s Ministry of Defence permanent secretary, two
commissioners of the Zimbabwe Republic Police, and current and former
officers of the Zimbabwe Defence Forces.
Of all the companies
Biti is particularly critical of Anjin which he accuses of not remitting
anything to Treasury despite being the largest diamond producer
on the Marange diamond fields.
However, the
Chinese-owned diamond producer - which has ventured into the hospitality
and aviation industries - says it has discharged its statutory obligations
and had remitted US$30 million to Treasury adding that the finance
minister was scapegoating them for over-estimating possible diamond
revenue by basing his US$600 million projection on the assumption
that a carat of diamond was worth US$1,300 when, in fact, its average
value is US$60.
“It is
either he is untruthful, incompetent or illiterate. He made the
blunder and miscalculated. He must be man enough and admit that
he made a mistake,” Anjin board member Munyaradzi Machacha
said.
Mines Minister
Obert Mpofu also maintains that the mining industry was contributing
enough and was the biggest contributor to Zimbabwe’s economy.
“Biti is a liar. The mining industry is the largest contributor
to the country’s economy,” Mpofu a Mining, Engineering
and Transport (Mine Entra) conference in Bulawayo following Biti’s
mid-Term Fiscal Policy Review.
Mpofu is also
accused of directly benefiting from the Marange diamond fields and
is famed to own half of Zimbabwe resort town of Victoria Falls.
Zanu - PF politburo
member, former Minister of Mines and current Parliamentary Committee
on Mines and Energy chairperson, Edward Chininga, in a government
local daily the Chronicle, blamed the current sanctions regime for
the limited revenue flow from Marange as they are ‘creating
loopholes for illegal trade and fiscal leakages,’ a muted
confirmation of shadowy diamond deals in the sector. All four firms
were slapped with US sanctions as they are under ZMDC a primary
target of the financial restrictions.
In Chininga’s
call for the removal of the US sanctions recently he said since
the four companies are now fully compliant with the Kimberly Process
Certification Scheme (KPCS) which the US itself chaired until recently
should lift the restrictions.
“Therefore,”
Chininga said of the US, “it should not at the same time create
an environment that promotes illegal sale of diamonds through financial
sanctions that force companies to circumvent normal export channels.
These financial restrictions and sanctions create loopholes for
illegal, fiscal leakages and loss of revenues to Zimbabwe.”
This explains
why perhaps the balance sheets of the firms operating in Marange
remain so opaque.
Eddie Cross
a Bulawayo South Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) Member of
Parliament speaking at the CNRG conference also claimed the Minister
of Mines was covering up Zanu-PF’s illicit diamond deals in
the past five years.
Cross said Mpofu
misrepresented to Parliament that Zimbabwe had realised only $200
million from the sale of raw diamonds over five years in which time
total payments to Treasury had been over $174 million imputing that
the miners had paid out most of the money earned from the sale of
diamonds something he said was patently false.
Cross even argues
that Zanu-PF strategically positioned the current mining firms to
secure the Marange fields to assure the party of funding on the
eve of its entry into a government of national unity (GNU) in which
they were to lose control of Treasury and the social welfare ministry
which has the National Social Security Authority (NSSA) - a cash
cow, to his party.
He said there
was no hope that there could even be transparency in Marange for
as long as the current actors retained their licences which forms
his party’s support for the nationalisation of the fields
which Biti has been pushing for. “In 2011, the Parliament
of Zimbabwe adopted a motion without dissent, that the Marange diamond
fields be nationalised. It is pleasing to see that the Minister
of Finance has announced that that is exactly what is intended under
the new Diamond Act and that we can expect action shortly,”
he said.
While Partnership
Africa Canada (PAC) a key civic organisation in the KPCS in a report
published last month claim that Zimbabwe may have lost up to US$2
billion over the past three years Cross claims that this year alone
more than 37 million carats of diamonds worth over $4billion have
been extracted from Marange.
Cross, an economist
said while his estimates appeared outrageous they were in fact conservative
arguing that they were based on actual figures he obtained during
his own private investigations. However his colleague in MDC and
Mpofu’s deputy in the ministry of mines, Gift Chimanikire
told Voice of America that while he was unsure of the source of
Cross’s figures they seemed “too exaggerated.”
Cross said in
2011 he got copies of actual daily production figures for Marange
Resources (Pvt.) limited which showed that in 2009, the company
processed 25000 tonnes of ore/sand producing an average of 19.86
carats per tonne which he then used to generate his estimates.
Evidence of
income that is not being accounted for strongly indicating it is
emanating from Marange includes a deficit on imports of an excess
of US$4 billion; 2012 motor vehicle imports of US$1,4 billion; significant
expenditure by individuals and firms linked to Marange including
luxury apartments and houses, even high rise buildings in South
Africa; expenditure of perhaps $300 million via the Presidents Fund
on free crop inputs, scholarships and bursaries (64 per cent of
students at Fort Hare University in South Africa is paid for by
this scholarship); purchase of two new long range Airbus Aircrafts
(to be hired out to Air Zimbabwe); and expenditures on military
equipment and facilities that are not provided for in the national
budget, among other things.
CNRG Executive
Director Farai Maguwu expressed fears at that the diamond revenue
Treasury is failing to account for could be used by Zanu-PF to subvert
the country’s democratic processes.
Speaking at
the same conference Deputy Minister for Justice and Legal Affairs,
Obert Gutu, an MDC-T senior official, called on civic organisations
to gather forensic evidence on any irregularities in the sector
for his ministry to act on. Gutu cast doubt on the effectiveness
of the recently unveiled diamond policy because of rampant corruption.
Cross, Maguwu
and Gutu however made it clear that Zimbabweans could not possible
expect KPCS to help address the national quest for greater transparency
in the sector due to its limited definition of ‘conflict diamonds’
which does not cover the current scenario unfolding in Zimbabwe.
In June 2009,
Ian Smillie, the research coordinator for PAC who helped draft the
KPCS, quit his post, saying, “[The Kimberley Process] is in
danger of becoming irrelevant and it’s letting all manner
of crooks off the hook.”
The debate surrounding
the capacity of the KPCS to clean the market of blood diamonds while
it hung on to a limited definition of “conflict diamonds”
led to the withdrawal of founding member Global Witness from the
process in December 2011.
“The Kimberly
Process does not take into account human and legal rights abuse
in the exploitation of diamonds, it only adopts a stance if it can
be demonstrated that diamond production is being used to promote
and fund armed attacks on civilians. It does not take into account
the use of such funds to destabilise countries or political systems.
It therefore cannot be taken as a suitable measure to define what
has and is happening in Zimbabwe,” Cross said.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|