| |
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
New Constitution-making process - Index of articles
Referendum
the only elixir to a new constitution
Aribino
Nicholas
September 13, 2012
The debate
on a new constitution has, among other things, generated more
heat than light in Zimbabwe. This heat seems to be a result of ideological
positions that different political parties are identifying with.
The political parties want their voices to be heard in the new constitution
at the cost of what people have said. People expressed their viewpoints
about what the new constitution should embrace during an opinion
shopping exercise on the new constitution that was managed by COPAC.
It is disturbing to note that the issue of a new constitution has
dragged on for some time now without any meaningful conclusion to
it; rather it has only managed to benefit a handful of people in
terms of allowances. For example, recently it was recommended that
MPs that had used their vehicles during the constitution making
process should be given $10.000 each to make up for the damage of
their vehicles. One is forgiven for thinking that the constitution
making process has become a cash cow for a chosen few. If the constitution
process bleeds money like this then some people, the chosen few,
of course, would want the whole process to go ad infinitum.
A constitution
should be pregnant enough to reflect various shades of opinion of
people living in a multicultural society. In a multicultural society
people should respect one another's perceptions about reality.
Reality is influenced by cultural backgrounds, time, space and geography.
Differences between and among people indicate a healthy society.
After all, the only thing that is normal under the sun is difference.
Even if you were to look around you, you would see people who are
different in terms of taste, height, weight, complexion and ethnic
origin, among other things. Essentially, a constitution should reflect
the face of a multicultural society.
To me, the constitution
making process should resemble a qualitative research. A qualitative
research is narrative (descriptive). Before a researcher publishes
his or her findings, he or she goes back to the research participants
to seek confirmation or disconfirmation of the data gathered. This
is done against the epistemological assumption that reality is just
as multifaceted as the people who experience it (Schwandt, 1998).
The researcher therefore, has to focus on the "world as it
is lived, felt, undergone by the actors" (Schwandt, 1998).
Constructivists argue that knowledge and truth are a result of perspectives
and meanings people place on social events and according to Hammersley
and Atkinson (1995) the people-s perspectives are not static
but are constructed and reconstructed on the basis of the interpretations
of the situations that they find themselves. Given this analogy,
it is only judicious that the political parties in Zimbabwe should
stop haggling over what people said should be contained in the new
constitution; instead the draft constitution should be taken back
to the people for confirmation or disconfirmation of its contents.
People-s viewpoints should never be adulterated, polluted
or corrupted by politicians. Why should politicians negotiate people-s
perceptions of a new constitution that they would want? People have
spoken and let them through a referendum tell us if what they said
is what is contained in the draft constitution.
COPAC should
be like a midwife. A midwife facilitates the birth of a baby. The
sex of the baby is not in anyway his or her cup of coffee. COPAC
did what it did and should now revisit the same people from which
it garnered views about the new constitution for their take on the
contents of the new constitution. Ideological positions within members
of COPAC and members of their political parties are occluding progress.
Had a civic group run the constitution making process, there could
have been finality to whole exercise.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|