|
Back to Index
Democratic
forces must corner Zanu PF
Pedzisai
Ruhanya, The Independent (Zimbabwe)
June 22, 2012
http://www.theindependent.co.zw/2012/06/22/democratic-forces-must-corner-zanu-pf/
After the March
29 2008 relatively free
and fair general election won by the then opposition MDC, Zanu
PF resorted to violent
political repression against pro-democracy activists especially
after its leader, President Robert Mugabe, lost to MDC leader Morgan
Tsvangirai in the presidential poll. When the history of the fall
of Zanu PF is written, this will be highlighted as a critical moment
in the political demise of the former liberation party.
Zanu PF enlisted
the support of the army in the presidential run-off to terrorise
unarmed civilians whose only crime was to choose a leader and party
of their choice. The result of that June 27 2008 poll is what brought
Zimbabwe to the sad state it is today, a country governed by an
illegitimate Zanu PF elite that derives its powers from the coercive
apparatuses of the state.
Mugabe-s
sham electoral victory was dismissed by the AU and Sadc observer
missions as well as the EU, the Confederation of South African Trade
Unions and individual countries such as Botswana and Zambia who
were very clear on the illegitimacy of the Harare regime.
Sadc has met
four times in Zambia, South Africa, Namibia and Angola and discussed
the Zimbabwean problem among other issues. At the meetings Mugabe
and the other parties (the two MDC formations) have been reminded
to respect the GPA
and allow the implementation of necessary reforms that should lead
to free, fair and credible elections.
The last meeting
in Angola insisted on previous positions of the regional group,
basically telling Mugabe, and indeed other leaders, that electoral
unilateralism and dictatorship was no longer acceptable to Sadc.
Instead of taking
heed, Zanu PF is slowly returning to its pre-GPA electoral shenanigans
as it prepares for a violent poll. The spate of arrests of pro-democracy
forces, assaults on political activist including two alleged murders
of MDC activists in Mutoko and Zaka districts, as well as the continued
abuse of the armed forces, are indicators of Zanu PF-s electoral
strategy: the use of violence for political ends.
Zanu PF needs
to appreciate that world leaders and leading democracies will not
legitimise a violent electoral process and outcome. The message
from across the Limpopo from President Jacob Zuma-s administration
is that it will not be "business as usual" until Zimbabwe
has a legitimate government. The continued call by Zuma, on behalf
of Sadc, for a democratic roadmap to the holding of future elections
sends a clear message to Zanu PF that a rigged poll is unacceptable.
Meanwhile, Zanu
PF has already identified its enemies as civil society, the political
opposition (MDC formations) and foreign companies through the politically-driven
indigenisation programme meant to secure votes for the party. It
is clear that Zanu PF-s "Look East" policy has
not yielded much hence its continued attempts to re-engage the West
so that it removes the targeted sanctions.
The unanimous
decision by the UN Security Council in 2011 to impose sanctions
on Zanu PF-s long time ally, the late dictator Muammar Gaddafi
leaves Zanu PF in a serious political quandary. It was the Security
Council-s decision to refer Gaddafi-s criminal conduct
in the uprising in Libya to the International Criminal Court that
unsettles Zanu PF most because that decision was taken with the
consent of Russia and China, countries that usually block such moves.
Consistently
Zanu PF has stood in defence of these repressive laws as necessary
to maintain law and order in Zimbabwe, a euphemism for its illegitimate
stay in power. These reforms are contained in the GPA that Sadc
is consistently asking the parties to implement.
Instead of bowing
to popular domestic, regional and international pressure by repealing
these laws, the Zanu PF element in the unity government continues
to selectively use these laws to further its narrow political interests
by applying laws such as the Criminal
Law (Codification and Reform) Act to demean the substance and
social fibre of the justice system in Zimbabwe.
Posa,
a worthy successor to Rhodesia-s Law and Order (Maintenance)
Act, is a favourite tool of Zanu PF and its use could increase if
the political impasse within the unity government continues. It
should not be forgotten that the central objective of promulgating
these laws and the setting up of other institutions and infrastructure
of repression was to silence the democratic forces in Zimbabwe,
and for as long as Zanu PFs legitimacy is questioned, it will continue
to use these draconian laws.
As a result,
Zimbabwean politics reads like a nomad-s diary. With promises
of a better future, every election has been seen as an opportunity
to set the pace for development through creating a new vision that
people must rally behind. But these hopes have been consistently
dashed by an increasingly stubborn Zanu PF political elite.
Zanu PF-s
loss in the 2008 general election has a number of ramifications
in terms of governance and democracy. The first consequence for
the party was its increased fear and paranoia, perceiving as it
did a threat against from outsiders who it accused of supporting
the opposition through sanctions. The party is using this warped
thinking to abuse human rights under the guise of safeguarding the
national interest, when it is clear that citizens are no longer
interested in hollow and bankrupt politics and tired liberation
discourse.
In this regard,
civil society organisations and the democratic opposition have huge
challenges. They have to continue to guard against complacency by
not believing that the inclusive government made up of three political
parties alone can resolve this crisis.
It is in the
interests of a possible political transition built on Sadc consistency
on creating political normalcy in Zimbabwe premised on fulfilling
GPA reforms that civil society groups should remain resolute and
continue to push for the full democratisation of the country premised
on the rule of law.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|