|
Back to Index
Why
Mugabe is unlikely to share Gaddafi-s grisly fate
David
Smith, The Guardian (UK)
October 24, 2011
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/oct/24/mugabes-enemy-is-his-health
The jacaranda
trees are blooming in Harare, draping its broad avenues with canopies
of purple and green. The shops are bustling, hotels and restaurants
are often full, children are at school, young couples are walking
in the park. No sign of a revolution here. Coming to Zimbabwe after
two spells in Libya this year, I felt like they were not merely
the length of a continent apart, but on different planets.
While North
Africa has been convulsed by revolution, life in Zimbabwe in 2011
has continued to flow in a comparatively gentle, uneventful way.
President Robert Mugabe, immovable for three decades, has little
cause to be kept awake at night by last week-s chilling images
of a bloody, battered and bewildered Muammar Gaddafi pleading for
his life.
Could it happen
here? Not likely. I wondered why not. After all, Zimbabweans (led
by Mugabe among others) rose up a generation ago to overthrow Rhodesia-s
white minority regime. "Fear," explained one former
minister in Mugabe-s government. Past public marches have
been brutally crushed. Earlier this year 46
activists here were arrested and charged with treason for merely
watching a video of the uprising in Egypt. Okay Machisa, director
of the Zimbabwe
Human Rights Association, told me: "The Arab spring did
not go down well with the Mugabe regime.
Jailing those
activists was a way of saying we don-t want people to go on
the streets and demonstrate." But there was plenty of fear
in Gaddafi-s Libya too. What-s different is that Zimbabwe
offers the illusion, at least, of freedom of speech and democracy.
On street corners vendors sell independent newspapers with virulently
anti-Mugabe headlines and editorials. (TV and radio remain a different
story. Some newspapers too. One ruefully exclaimed: "If only
British politicians were as brave and selfless as Robert Gabriel
Mugabe!") Whereas Libyans had no hope of removing Gaddafi
except by desperate force, Zimbabweans can channel their efforts
into a political party, the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC).
The MDC possibly
acts as a sponge, soaking up revolutionary fervour that would otherwise
find expression on the streets. I visited the MDC leader Morgan
Tsvangirai, who has survived beatings and electoral fraud to become
Prime Minister in a fraught power-sharing agreement with Mugabe-s
Zanu-PF party. Does Tsvangirai envy the Arab spring? "No.
It-s their situation and circumstances and conditions that
dictated behaviour. One of the fundamental things that I can say
is that you cannot suppress people forever. One thing to learn from
that is people will always cry for freedom. It is universal.
"We are
in a different situation, we have different circumstances and we
have got our own way of dealing with our situation. That is why
the MDC has pursued change without bloodshed and I think we are
correct."
At 87, Mugabe
is the oldest member of Africa-s ageing dictators club. Three
of the 10 longest serving leaders have fallen this year - Ben Ali
of Tunisia ruled for 23 years, Hosni Mubarak of Egypt for 30 and
the longest, Gaddafi, for nearly 42.But all were in the Arab north.
South of the
Sahara, in "black" Africa, the winds of change are mere
zephyrs. Still going strong are Teodoro Obiang Nguema of Equatorial
Guinea (32 years), Jose Santos of Angola (32), Mugabe (31), Paul
Biya of Cameroon (29), Yoweri Museveni of Uganda (25), King Mswati
III of Swaziland (24) and Blaise Campaoré of Burkina Faso
(24). There has been some mild turbulence for some of them this
year but nothing to frighten the presidents- horses. Far from
Gaddafi-s grisly demise, Mugabe seems destined to go quietly
into that good night. His greatest enemy is not the gun-toting revolutionary
with a mobile video camera, but time.
Tsvangirai gave
this view: "President Mugabe-s health is a national
question, a national concern. Why? Because when you have a partner
whose state of health is unpredictable, and that partner holds the
key to the unity of the opponent, what is likely to be the outcome
should he die is instability in the party, which leads to instability
in the country." It was a question that arose with Saddam
Hussein in Iraq and now again with Gaddafi in Libya.
Once the linchpin
of dictatorship is yanked out, must infighting and anarchy follow?
Some believe that Mugabe, whose reign is as old as independent Zimbabwe
itself, is the toxic glue that holds his party and country together.
But others point to neighbouring Zambia, where recent elections
saw the president accept defeat and a democratic transition of power.
Rupiah Banda is little known around the world and his unbloody,
unspectacular fall gained only a fraction of the coverage of Gaddafi.
But it may have been just as revolutionary in its way - and just
as unnerving to that cabal of ageing dictators.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|