|
Back to Index
A
tribute to Samora Machel of Mozambique
Wilfred
Mhanda
October 19, 2011
Today 19 October,
we commemorate the death of one of Africa-s greatest revolutionary
leaders, Samora Machel, who dedicated his life to the liberation
of not only Mozambique, but of Zimbabwe and South Africa as well.
Without his leadership role and support, the liberation of Zimbabwe
would have followed a more tortuous and longer route with greater
sacrifices on the part of the sons and daughters of Zimbabwe.
The mere liberation
of Mozambique was inspirational and motivational enough to drive
thousands and thousands of young Zimbabweans and South Africans
to join the ranks of the respective liberation movements in droves.
His concrete material support to the liberation movements and the
provision of rear bases thus came as an added bonus to their armed
struggle that spurred their struggles to greater heights.
In other words,
Mozambique-s liberation under the leadership of Samora Machel
served as the recruitment agent for the southern African liberation
movements. The mere fact that Mozambique attained its liberation
through an arduous armed struggle against the Portuguese colonialists,
convinced the Zimbabweans and South Africans that they too could
achieve liberation through armed struggle.
Machel did not
wait for the liberation of Mozambique to render support to Zimbabwe-s
liberation struggle. Frelimo-s victories in the battlefield
in the northern provinces of Cabo Delgado and Niassa, where they
had established liberated zones under the control of Frelimo, facilitated
the opening of an additional military front in Tete province that
bordered on Zimbabwe. The phenomenal successes of Frelimo convinced
the Portuguese military that they needed an extra hand from the
Rhodesian security forces in their operations in the Tete province.
The Rhodesians started operating in Tete in 1969.
There is no
doubt that Frelimo forces could have coped with Rhodesians intrusion
on their own. But the shrewd tactician and strategist that Machel
was, he approached Zimbabwe-s liberation movements, ZAPU and
ZANU and offered them to fight their way through Tete to Rhodesia.
He did not demand that they fight the Rhodesians in Tete province
but politely asked them whether they were interested in taking advantage
of Frelimo-s operations in the province to launch armed attacks
into Rhodesia.
First to be
approached was ZAPU who however could not take up the offer on account
of internal strife within the organization. When ZANU were subsequently
approached, they were more than ready to oblige and viewed the development
as a godsend opportunity. To that end, Meya Urimbo led a team of
five ZANLA cadres in 1971 into Mozambique-s Tete province
to understudy and gain experience in guerrilla techniques from Frelimo.
This is how
ZANLA came to establish a sustainable foothold in north-eastern
Zimbabwe. Without Machel-s offer, the development of Zimbabwe-s
liberation struggle would have followed an entirely different trajectory.
Operating from Tete province obviated the need to negotiate the
insuperable obstacle into Zimbabwe that the Zambezi River posed.
It was the military victories that FRELIMO, MPLA and PAIGC had scored
that led to the coup in Portugal that subsequently triggered the
decolonization of Portugal-s colonies.
Who was SamoraMachel?
Machel was born in 1933 and had only four years of primary education
to his credit after which he trained as medical assistant. He joined
Frelimo in 1963, a year after the formation of FRELIMO from UDENAMO,
MANU and Unami. He went for military training in Algeria in April
1963 and completed his training in May 1964. In Algeria, he rubbed
shoulders with some eminent ZIPRA cadres like Nikita Mangena and
Ambrose Mutinhiri. Algeria had inflicted a military defeat on French
colonialist in a seven year long war under the leadership of Ben
Bella. It became the first African country to train African guerrilla
fighters.
Upon his return
to Tanzania, he was appointed the commander of Nachingweya Camp.
He was appointed commander of Frelimo forces in 1966 following the
death of Filipe Magaia. After the assassination of Eduardo Mondlane
by PIDE in 1969, Machel became part of the triumvirate presidium
that assumed the leadership of Frelimno together with Uriah Simango,
the former vice president to Mondlane and Marcelino Do Santos.
He assumed the
leadership of Frelimo later that year in 1969 following the expulsion
of Simango by the central committee. Other senior figures in the
Machel led Frelimo were Do Santos as vice president, Alberto Chipande
as chief of defence, Joachim Chissano as head of security and intelligence,
Armando Guebuza as political commissar and Sebastiao Mabote as chief
of operations. It was under this new leadership that Frelimo approached
Herbert Chitepo, the ZANU national chairman in 1970 to start operating
from Tete province.
I first met
Samora Machel in 1975 as we discussed the formation of ZIPA and
the resumption of the war in Rhodesia. He was categorical and unflinching
in his support for the resumption of the war with Mozambique as
the rear base.
This was hardly
five months after Mozambique had attained independence. He declared
that Mozambique would never be free as long as they shared a border
with the racist minority regime in Rhodesia. In other words, he
viewed the struggle to liberate Zimbabwe as a struggle to consolidate
Mozambique-s independence; the two were two sides of the same
coin.
As we engaged
him on countless occasions, his simplicity, approachability, his
erudition and his commanding presence struck us all. He was a natural
born leader who commanded everyone-s respect. He shared freely
of his leadership experiences and had the capacity to make everyone
feel free to engage him on any matter. He had enormous responsibilities
in his hands to build a new Mozambique based on Frelimo-s
socialist ideals from the ashes of the former Portuguese colony.
Notwithstanding, he devoted a lot of attention to the armed struggle
in Zimbabwe. He was highly impressed by the successes that the ZIPA
commanders had scored in a relatively short period of operation.
Whilst he provided visionary leadership for ZIPA, he never interfered
in the actual planning and prosecution of the war, as a demonstration
of his confidence in the young commanders.
Machel considered
himself and his colleagues to be products of struggle. In his view,
it was the actual participation and involvement in the armed struggle
that shaped, nurtured and produced revolutionary leaders. He openly
bemoaned the lack of practical experience and active participation
in the struggle on the part of Zimbabwean nationalists. He encouraged
all of as ZIPA commander to go to the war front and gain war experience.
For Machel,
there was a difference between armed struggle in general and revolutionary
armed struggle. He was of the view that Zimbabwe-s war was
still a mere armed struggle that was still to graduate into a revolutionary
armed struggle. Whilst the objective of armed struggle in general
was to inflict military defeat on the enemy, a revolutionary armed
struggle had a transformative agenda that sought to create a new
society based on a new set of values that embodied progressive political,
economic, social and cultural empowerment of the people. To him,
independence on its own was not the goal of a revolutionary struggle
that sought to create a new state centred on the people-s
interests.
Machel sacrificed
his life for liberation ideals that encompassed freedom, democracy,
social justice and respect for human dignity that the peoples of
southern Africa had been denied by the racist minority regimes in
Rhodesia and South Africa. Julius Nyerere had aptly summed the philosophical
justification of armed struggle by declaring that "If we cannot
leave as a free people, we would rather die as free people".
The best tribute
that we can make to Machel, this gallant son of Africa is to re-dedicate
and re-commit ourselves to the ideals for which he fought and died;
is to position ourselves on the side of championing the people-s
interest by standing up and speaking out in defence of the people-s
rights. As another gallant son of Africa, Amilcar Cabral had stated
before his assassination, "not a day without the struggle,
not an hour without the movement and not a minute without the people".
Let us therefore
be resolute, steadfast, uncompromising, fear no sacrifice and surmount
every difficulty to achieve the people-s freedom.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|