|
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
Inclusive government - Index of articles
Spotlight on inclusive government: It's not working - Index of articles
If
it doesn't work, don't fix it
Tendai
Huchu, Africa Report
March 2011
Last August
I had the privilege of hearing David Coltart, Zimbabwe-s education
minister from the opposition Movement for Democratic Change, speak
at the Edinburgh Book Festival. Most of his talk focused on the
problems Zimbabwe faced - which are already well known - but I was
rather surprised when he moved on to speak about the cabinet-s
response to the teachers- wage strike in the preceding months.
He said that whilst he
had favoured a negotiated settlement, most of his colleagues from
his party, like those from the Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic
Front, were in favour of using the full extent of the country-s
repressive laws to break up the strike. It was only after Mugabe-s
personal intervention that the matter was decided in his favour.
What I found surprising
was the willingness of opposition members in the unity government
to use force against constituents who had previously suffered oppression
for supporting them. It seemed to me that once in a position of
power their attitude had already changed, which says a lot about
governments in our continent.
I found myself wondering
if changing the faces in government would change realities on the
ground. After all, we have been here before. The very revolutionaries
who suffered and bled under colonial oppression in turn began to
oppress the people who had supported them during Zimbabwe-s
independence struggle.
There are many absurd
parallels between Zimbabwe today and colonial Rhodesia. Nowhere
is this more apparent than in the role of the military and police,
which were set up, not primarily to protect the country from external
threats or maintain law and order, but to suppress citizens. Today
these institutions still mainly exist for this function. Other arms
of the government only serve to entrench the interest of the elite.
The prevailing attitude is "to govern is to completely dominate."
Whilst criticising the
government is easy, more nuanced are the parallels one finds in
society itself. The middle and upper classes have merely supplanted
the old white elite, with all the usual trappings - large
houses, fancy cars, housemaids, garden boys and foreign holidays.
They are all too comfortable flashing opulence, seemingly oblivious
of the dire poverty around them.
I am not convinced that
changing the faces in government is going to transform the country
in any meaningful way if it means preserving its blatantly colonial
character. What Zimbabwe needs is a meaningful national dialogue
that seeks to create a true African democracy: the creation of an
intellectual framework that everyone buys into, not just the wealthy
and powerful, and which seeks to transform the relationship between
the people and the state.
I do not pretend to know
what form such a framework would take, but with elections pending
later this year it is not enough to keep repeating the same formula
that has failed the people for 120 years.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|