| |
Back to Index
A
smarter African democratic model
Sipho
Hlongwane, The Daily Maverick
January 21, 2011
http://www.thedailymaverick.co.za/opinionista/2011-01-19-a-smarter-african-democratic-model
Western-style
democracy has not worked well in Africa, simply because the conditions
in Africa are different to those in developed countries. Why not
tailor-make a democratic solution to fit the nature and size of
the challenge in Africa?
Governments of national unity that are usually cobbled together
after election crises in Africa have been severely criticised for
rewarding those who unleash violence on their political enemies.
This was starkly evident in the 2008
Zimbabwean elections, where armed gangs loyal to the incumbent
Robert Mugabe-s Zanu-PF party terrorised supporters of Morgan
Tsvangirai-s Movement for Democratic Change. The compromise
deal, brokered by then-president of South Africa Thabo Mbeki, saw
the Zanu-PF and the MDC sharing power in a government of national
unity.
The Zimbabwean experiment did not work out as planned because it
failed to take into account the political allegiances of Zimbabwe-s
powerful military, as well as Mugabe-s ability to outwit the
politically inexperienced Tsvangirai.
A government of national unity was also formed in Kenya in the aftermath
of the violence of 2008, when opponents of President Mwai Kibaki
protested against what they perceived to be bias in his favour within
the electoral commission of Kenya. Former UN secretary general Kofi
Annan led a delegation to Kenya in 2008, and brokered a peace deal
between Kibaki-s Party of National Unity and the Orange Democratic
Movement of Raila Odinga, his main rival.
Under Annan-s deal, new positions in government were opened
up and the president would have to appoint ministers to his cabinet
based on each party-s relative strength in parliament. Kenya-s
coalition government eventually led to a new constitution that reduces
the executive powers of the presidency and grants a bill of rights
to the people.
The eyes of the world are now turned to Côte d'Ivoire, where
another post-election crisis is looming. The winner of the presidential
race between the incumbent Laurent Gbagbo and Alassane Outtara,
was declared to be the latter by preliminary results released by
the electoral commission. Gbagbo-s supporters immediately
challenged the result before the Constitutional Council, which was
packed with the president-s loyalists. Mindful of the bloody
civil war that broke out in Côte d'Ivoire in 2002, the US,
the UN Security Council and the regional Economic Community of West
African States declared Outtara the winner, leaving Gbagbo with
very few playing cards. Recent developments suggest Gbagbo is manoeuvring
himself into a position where a government of national unity will
be the safest and most politically palatable option for everyone
involved.
The idea of the unity government has its merits, however, despite
its failures in places like Zimbabwe. GNUs will remove from the
election equation the greatest fear that plagues African politics:
The losing party and its supporters getting spurned by government,
or worse. The likelihood of this occurring is heightened if political
allegiance is split along ethnic lines. To guarantee all sides a
say in government, proportional representation should be written
into government, and not just parliament. As happened in Kenya,
parties that are shown to have popular support should not only have
seats in parliament, but positions in government as well.
This solution may prove to be the most enduring one for a continent
where almost every single country suffers a lack of powerful democratic
institutions to protect the people against their own governments.
Separation of powers is non-existent when institutions such as the
courts, electoral councils and public protectors are packed with
supporters of one political party, or are subjugated altogether
by the executive branch.
The problem is often compounded by the fact that most of the economic
power in African countries is held by governments and not ordinary
civilians. The fight for power then becomes the fight for the biggest
pot of honey in the country.
To guarantee the opposition its safety, and the government-s
continued service towards it, there should be guaranteed participation
in government, even if the opposition loses the elections (and in
countries like Kenya and Zimbabwe, the opposition often loses by
a margin of less than 10%).
And it would be relatively easy to set it up, as long as everyone
knows the rules in advance. The problem with the Zimbabwean, Kenyan
and Côte d'Ivoirian examples is that they are the results
of he-who-controls-the-army-cannot-be-defeated. But if everyone
knows what to expect, the de-stabilising element would largely be
avoided. In the Philippines, as it was in the early years of still-shaky
US democracy, the position of vice president is occupied by the
runner-up, no matter how opposed to the winner.
The composition of such government does not have to be purely proportional,
of course. The winner still has to be acknowledged, by occupying
most of the important portfolios and being given all the shares
the small parties won - small parties being those that couldn't
reach a threshold of, say, 10%. But ensuring the loser has a stake
in the future of the country too could go a long way to assuring
post-election reality is not a violent one. Once the political instability
that follows hotly contested elections is removed, the next step
of strengthening democratic institutions can be taken.
And maybe, just maybe, in 50 or so years of stable, participative
democracy, the institutions thereof will strengthen sufficiently
for the citizens to be able to relax and trust that, no matter who's
in power, they will be safe and prosperous. But it would be unrealistic
to expect that it is possible these days in Africa to implement
a rigid system - that took developed countries hundreds of years
to achieve.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|