|
Back to Index
2011:
It-s make or break time for Zimbabwe
Chitupa Mashiri
January 02, 2011
This year-s
political events could herald the beginning of the end of Robert
Mugabe-s controversial grip on power. Some commentators believe
this to be Zimbabwe-s make or break time on the political
front. That is precisely the case especially as we have learnt that
South African President Jacob Zuma is drafting a roadmap to Zimbabwe-s
elections due this year.
The document which every concerned Zimbabwean would
like to lay their hands on will be presented at an extraordinary
meeting of the SADC Organ on Politics, Defence and Security in the
next few weeks. The reason for the excitement is not what we already
know, namely the SADC or Mauritius Principles and Guidelines governing
democratic elections but what diplomats say is or will be contained
in the roadmap - mechanisms for the transfer of power.
Before we get
too excited, a word of caution is that 'the devil is in the
details-. We have seen the true meaning of that saying since
the signing of the so-called Global
Political Agreement (GPA) in 2008. After the signing, there
were allegations, counter allegations as well as denials about the
'doctoring- of the GPA and how some paragraphs went
missing from the final document signed on the 15th of September
2008. It is useful to reflect on the experience of the GPA in order
to put into perspective some of the coalition government-s
problems and chart the way forward. 'Forewarned is forearmed-
so goes the saying.
Responding to the allegations in an interview with
Violet Gonda of SW Radio Africa in November 2008, Welshman Ncube
Secretary General of the faction led by Arthur Mutambara said: "The
allegations can only be the product of people who are extremely
malicious, who have no journalistic ethics who run with a stupid
false story without even the decency of talking to the people who
are accused of the fraudulent alteration of a document. As far as
I know I did not take part nor participate in any alteration of
any agreement at all. The fact of the matter is that yes there are
alterations in the document which was signed by the principals on
the 15th. Those alterations are three - I will come to that
in a moment."
(There were three documents. There appeared to be
no problem with the first two documents which formed the agenda
of the negotiators and the agreement signed on the 11th September,
respectively) my own emphasis.
"So the first two documents are correct ",
Ncube said. "The third document which was signed at the formal
ceremony on the 15th of September has three alterations or three
omissions - if I may call them that. As far as we know we
have raised this with Zanu-pf and (Patrick) Chinamasa whose Ministry
of Justice was responsible for producing the final document which
was to be signed by the principals. Minister Chinamasa has freely
admitted that he made one of those alterations because - he
explains - he was advised by his principal (Robert Mugabe)
that the three principals - Morgan Tsvangirai, Arthur Mutambara
and Robert Mugabe had agreed to alter the document to that effect.
And as far as we know that is not correct. We have checked with
our principal (Mutambara) who denies that he ever agreed to change
the document to that effect", he said.
"And that particular change is a change in
the original that we negotiated and agreed. It was to provide that
the five existing Senate seats shall go to Zanu-pf. There shall
be created an additional six Senate seats - four of which
will go to Morgan Tsvangirai-s MDC and two of which will go
to Arthur Mutambara-s MDC. It is that clause which Chinamasa
altered to read that the existing five will go to Zanu-pf and nthere
shall be an additional nine - three to be shared equally among the
three parties. "That was never part of the agreement. It is
an invention of Patrick Chinamasa and he admits that he is the one
who put it there. The South Africans were not involved. We were
not involved. I was not involved. So it is absolutely malicious
for someone to suggest that some of us were involved when in fact
the person who altered the document freely admits that he altered
it and explains why he altered it, in that respect . . . ",
Ncube said.
According to Violet Gonda the second alteration
is a paragraph that is completely missing in the final document.
The missing paragraph says anyone appointed to the position of Deputy
Prime Minister and Vice President would automatically be a Member
of Parliament. If that person is already an MP his/her party will
appoint a non-constituency MP. Ncube said this clause is missing
and said Chinamasa claims it was "deleted by accident."
(Welshman Ncube denies doctoring power sharing document, SW Radio
Africa, 03/11/08).
The third alteration comes in the form of another
missing paragraph in the final agreement that said the Prime Minister
and his Deputy Prime Ministers and the President and his Vice Presidents
shall sit to make appointments of senior government employees like
Ambassadors and Permanent Secretaries. Patrick Chinamasa allegedly
claimed the paragraph was accidentally deleted.
Now my comments:
If the allegations about the doctoring of the GPA
had not been made, the public would have remained in the dark about
some of the problems which are threatening Zimbabwe-s coalition
government. The information provided by Ncube was very useful in
the sense that we can now understand what Zanu-pf is up to. In view
of these disclosures, we can understand why Morgan Tsvangirai called
Mugabe a crook, and why Morgan Tsvangirai was disappointed with
Mugabe-s unilateral appointment of governors, ambassadors
and so on. We can also understand why Mugabe allegedly ordered the
deletion of the two paragraphs in the final document well before
the government was formed. Hopefully, MDC will be more vigilant
next time. Given the bad faith shown by Mugabe and Zanu-pf and the
ongoing persecution of Tsvangirai, the MDC should stick to the coalition
government and attend cabinet meetings but ignore Mugabe-s
Monday morning teas. We learn from chess about the tactic of 'keeping
our friends close and some of our enemies closer-. It may
be what Mugabe is doing to Tsvangirai but it can work the other
way round too.
Another observation worth making is whether Jacob
Zuma will also submit to SADC the much awaited secret report on
Zimbabwe-s election 2002 and the Army Generals Report on Zimbabwe-s
Election 2008 for consideration by the Troika, now that two court
orders have cleared the way for the release of the 2002 report to
Mail and Guardian. This is because SADC has said an independent
investigation is needed to verify reports of violence and intimidation
before a general election can be held in Zimbabwe (Tichaona Sibanda,
SWRadioAfrica, 23/11/10).
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|