THE NGO NETWORK ALLIANCE PROJECT - an online community for Zimbabwean activists  
 View archive by sector
 
 
    HOME THE PROJECT DIRECTORYJOINARCHIVESEARCH E:ACTIVISMBLOGSMSFREEDOM FONELINKS CONTACT US
 

 


Back to Index

The lawyer consciousness
Marshal N. Mapondera
August 04, 2010

"All the world's a stage, and all the men and women merely players; they have their exits and their entrances, and one man in his time plays many parts"
(William Shakespeare (1564-1616)-As You Like it (Twelfth Night) Act II Scene VII; 1599)

These were the wise words of William Shakespeare that have survived five centuries in value and veracity. We all have important positions of responsibility on this planet. We are forever under scrutiny whether we are aware of it or not, whether we have planned it or not, the community is watching, for each of us is an actor with a part to play, with a chance to prove ourselves whilst in office. This community that has grown into a global village has since the 17th of July 1998 created a global criminal justice system through the Rome Statue which establishes the International Criminal Court (ICC) at The Hague, Holland. Fully operational since July 2002, the court has been assertive in realising the global dream to end impunity. It is uncompromising as it champions the rights of the voiceless against the perpetrators of international crimes traditionally perceived as the 'untouchables -of society, the political leaders and military officers. Sadly some of these are lawyers. When lawyers team up to wreck a whole region, violating human rights for selfish interests like former US President, George W. Bush and former UK Prime Tony Blair; the legal profession is now the elite club of villainy.

Lawyers play an important role in world politics as policy makers and they are duty bound to be exemplary in all their conduct as guardians of civil rights and liberties. One of my lecturers once confided in me that upon leaving law school, the world would expect much more from me as a lawyer, than what I am actually trained for! This he said was because lawyers, for some reason are thought to be capable enough to handle anything and everything. The litigious layperson is never hesitant to mouth off "Don-t talk to me, talk my lawyer!" or "Just you wait! You-ll hear from my lawyer!" even when the problem maybe moral or social and better dealt with by other professionals.

My personal observation reveals that this may be because of the important public roles that lawyers have played right throughout history. Nationalist leaders like Nelson Mandela, Robert Mugabe, Herbert Chitepo, Ambassador Justice Simbi Mubako and Dr. Edison Zvobgo were lawyers. Many world leaders are lawyers by profession, for instance Barrack and Michelle Obama, Thabo Mbeki, George W. Bush, Bill and Hilary Clinton, Tony Blair; Nicholas Sarkozy, Levy Mwanawasa, the list is endless. It becomes no surprise therefore that the current Zimbabwean political scene has a respectable number of lawyers at play, like Tendai Biti, Advocate Eric Matinenga, David Coltart, Patrick Chinamasa, and Professor Welshman Ncube.

My take on our profession is that the lawyer is a solution provider, period. Whether it is in litigation, legal drafting or policy making, we are expected to ensure justice and equity for those we represent. Either side of the coin is engraved with Rights or Obligations that we ought to balance to ensure justice. Civil rights become top priority for any legal professional whether he is a prosecutor, magistrate, judge, advocate, attorney, company secretary, policy maker or law professor. We cannot flip the coin in legal duels to gamble with people-s rights, moreso where human rights are concerned, be they civil, political, or socio-economic rights. We cannot manoeuvre legal principles for personal gain, where we should not have an interest.

The Rome statute criminalises genocide, crimes against humanity, crimes of war and crimes of aggression. It has temporal jurisdiction as it criminalises actions after July 2002, when it came into force. Pursuant to the statue, the Prosecutor, can initiate an investigation on the basis of a referral from any state party (Chapter VII of the Charter) or from the UN Security Council. In addition the Prosecutor can initiate ine proprio motu (of his own volition) on the basis of information on crimes within the jurisdiction of the court received from individuals or civic organisations.

The ICC Prosecution has had only voluntary referrals from three African States; Uganda, the DRC and the Central African Republic with the addition of the Security Council referral of the situation in Darfur, Sudan. In Uganda for instance, there is the case of The Prosecutor v Joseph Kony, Vincent Otti, Okot Odiambo and Dominic Ongwen four suspects of the Lord-s Resistance Army (LRA) (still at large) before the court, while the DRC has amongst three, The Prosecutor v Thomas Lubanga Dyilo; the Central African Republic has The Prosecutor v Jean Pierre Bemba Gombo; and the Sudan has The Prosecutor v Ahmah Muhammad Hamn ("Ahmad Hamin") amongst three.

It is globally agreed of course that the United States of America, the most powerful nation on earth, has been on an antagonistic campaign against the court. Its bilateral "immunity" agreements with other nations (which it manipulates) based on its legislation, "The American Service Members Protection Act (ASPA)" dubbed "The Hague invasion Act" allow it to escape the prosecution of its nationals so that it can 'prosecute- them on its own. It hides behind the complementary nature of the Rome Statute. Whether or not it actually prosecutes them is their word against the whole world, what is only certain is that victims of their crimes may not see justice done.

Incumbent US President Barrack Obama has seemingly brought a totally different attitude towards the court, however. On 5February 2009, he publicly endorsed support for the court. The writer sees this as part of a global change in attitude that international crimes are a global concern and coming from a lawyer it should mean that much. The ICC is not a court "against the poorest" southern states but a court against perpetrators of all forms of crimes against the human person. It is not a tool of colonisation, for impunity, tribalism, discrimination and greed existed long before then while corruption and tyranny have become the identity independent Africa without any help from the North. Even if America does not support the ICC and escapes its clutches, we cannot use that as an excuse to be found in violation of human rights against our own people as lawyers.

It may be submitted at this juncture that eight years down, notwithstanding the African Union and the League of Arab States questioning the legitimacy of the Rome Statue, it seems more African States are buying into the idea of an international criminal court for the entire world to end impunity. The Republic of South Africa leads by example as it becomes the first African State to fully integrate the Rome Statute in its domestic legislation, while the DRC, Uganda, Ghana, Benin, Lesotho and Senegal follow suit. Zimbabwe however is yet to ratify the statute. This should not give us any reason to act with impunity as we too lack in resources and legitimate policy as well as sufficient judicial independence to deal with perpetrators.

Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights (ZLHR) Board Chairperson, award winning Andrew Makoni, recently stated that;

"The society we live in is till not the best place to be. It-s unstable, uncertain and unjust . . . Human Rights continue to be violated with impunity. The perpetrators who are known are unaccountable and continue to confidently roam the streets realising that they are untouchables. "

Mr Makoni could not have been more accurate in his observation of current events. A different era seems imminent, when what was once acceptable policy would be unmasked for the heinous crime that it is. When allowing unruly civil violence in violation of ubuntu as 'xenophobia-, or property deprivation and bulldozing of homes during winter as 'government policy-, will fit neatly in a little paragraph in the Rome Statute labelled International Financial Crimes against Humanity. The abolition of apartheid and the creation of a people driven constitution in South Africa is a good example, having been spearheaded by one man, an outstanding lawyer. Nelson Mandela was convicted in 1962 for engaging illegally in the struggle against apartheid and incarated for 27 years on Robben Island. Before sentencing he made his famous speech from the dock where he explained why he defied the same laws he once swore allegiance to as a lawyer and inciting others to do the same. He said;

"Your Worship, I would say that the whole life of any thinking African in this country drives continuously to a conflict between his conscience on the one hand and the law on the other. This is not a conflict peculiar to this country. The conflict arises for men of conscience, for men who think and feel deeply in every country. Recently in Britain, a peer of the realm, Ear Russell, probably the most respected philosopher of the Western world was sentenced, convicted for precisely the type of activities for which I stand before you today, for following his conscience in defiance of the law. For him, his duty to the public, his belief in morality of the essential rightness of the cause for which he stood, rose superior to his high respect for the law. He could do no other than oppose the law and suffer the consequences for it. Nor can I . . . Nor can many Africans in this country. "

Mandela, once a villain is now a hero because he followed his 'lawyer consciousness-. A time comes when some current 'heroes- will become villains. It is only fair dear colleagues that we caution each other now and challenge one other to stand for what is right be it in defiance of current repressive, unjust laws even in the face of persecution . For one day when facing the International Prosecutor representing thousands if not millions of sufferers and countless more voiceless dead victims unable to testify, a careless response like; "Well, it seemed right at the time, your Honour." would simply be aggravating!

". . .a black beard will turn white, a curled pate will grow bald, a fair face will wither, a full eye will wax hollow. But a good heart . . . is the sun and moon. . . for it shines bright and never changes, but keeps its course truly." William Shakespeare (1598) Henry V, Act 3 Scene 1

* Marshal Mapondera can be reached at marshal@mail2consultant.com with comments

Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.

TOP