|
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
Inclusive government - Index of articles
Pitfalls
of national consciousness and the crisis of the national project
in Zimbabwe
Dr. Sabelo
J. Ndlovu- Gatsheni
March 30, 2010
The signing
of the Global
Political Agreement in September 2008 and the installation of
the Inclusive Government in February 2009 provided hope to the poor
and underprivileged in Zimbabwe, who had experienced not only violence
but numerous problems ranging from shortage of basic commodities,
endless electricity cuts, water shortages, devastating cholera outbreak
and endured a bizarre situation of having to buy the few available
goods in foreign currency while being paid in worthless Zimbabwe
dollars. Indeed there is no doubt that the Inclusive Government
has made commendable strides towards restoration of normalcy in
Zimbabwe.
While money is still
in short supply, basic commodities are now available, violence has
subsided, schools have opened and the national economy is showing
signs of revival albeit a painstaking one. In spite of all these
positives, Zimbabweans must be cautious not to engage in pre-mature
celebrations. We still need to know why our country reached such
low ebb. We cannot expect a brighter future beyond this crisis,
without clearly understanding why we experienced an unprecedented
crisis in the first place. Our leaders must know and accept that
critics are not necessarily enemies of the nation but concerned
citizens who want to see right things being done for the sake of
the nation. It is in this spirit that I still feel as a nation we
have not given ourselves time to do a thorough, deeper, sober and
honest explanation of why Zimbabwe plunged into crisis at the beginning
of 2000. This is not a mere intellectual exercise, but is necessary
if the nation has to avoid a similar crisis in future.
This exercise is pertinent
because within the Inclusive Government there is no consensus on
the causes of the crisis leading inevitably to a lack of consensus
on what is to be done to transcend the crisis. The former ruling
party (ZANU-PF) still insists that the crisis was caused by imperialist
sanctions. The MDC factions insist on the culpability if not responsibility
of ZANU-PF for the political and economic melt-down that left Zimbabwe
a shell of its former stature. In short, as a nation we are not
yet beyond the simplistic politics of denials and blaming each other.
The full implementation of GPA is hostage to this retrogressive
politics.
The key question is what
went wrong in Zimbabwe? Unless our leaders look beyond the useless
politics of denials and blaming one another, they will miss the
big picture. The Zimbabwe crisis is largely an African crisis. A
crisis emanating from what Frantz Fanon termed 'the pitfalls
of national consciousness- that leads to national tragedy.
Its roots are traceable to the limits of decolonisation and the
poverty of the social basis of African nationalism as an emancipatory
project. In order to simplify things, I will call it the crisis
of the Zimbabwe national project. It is a crisis that emerges from
unresolved modes of accumulation; unresolved definition of the authentic
subject of liberation; unresolved problems of belonging; unresolved
racial nationalism and contested teleology of decolonisation. Academics
like Brian Raftopoulos and others are clear on these issues but
I am not sure that our leaders and citizens realise the salience
of these issues. ZANU-PF reduced these complex issues to the land
question and their solution was a confused one of 'conquest
of conquest- in which those defined as natives had to be allowed
to re-conquer those considered settlers. It is from this understanding
of the Zimbabwean situation that some people see the country progressing
through a series of Zvimurenga from 1896 to 2010. This wrong methodology
plunged Zimbabwe into what Fanon described as the nightmare of repetition
without difference. In this case, Zimbabwe found itself repeating
and practising the cannons of racial nationalism (reverse racism)
as a solution to the problems rooted in white settler racial colonialism.
This went hand in hand with the politics of destruction of people
in the name of things particularly in the former white owned commercial
farms. The Black Nationalist bourgeoisie found themselves organising
themselves in the same manner in which white settler bourgeoisie
did into what I would call 'loot committees.- All this
was covered under the noble gloss of either Africanisation of civil
service, nationalisation of means of production or indigenisation
of the economy. The colonialists called it pacification of barbarous
tribes and civilising mission. The nationalists call it Chimurenga
and liberation. While the colonialist did not conquer Africa to
be poor, the nationalist did not fight for liberation of Africa
to be poor! What a paradox? Is this not manifest in the way the
land reform programme was hijacked by 'native bourgeoisie-?
Are we not witnessing this in the manner in which Chiadzwa diamonds
are being extracted and sold? Is clinging to state power at whatever
cost not linked to the politics of accumulation? Who then can deny
Frantz Fanon-s critique of decolonisation as resulting in
'repetition without difference-? Are we not repeating
the crude ways of primitive accumulation that has its roots in the
unfolding of Western modernity which eventually resulted in imperialism
and colonialism? Indeed we have not escaped the laws of repetition
and have failed the test of ethical based notions of being free
and empowered.
Like Fanon, I think the
key failure of decolonisation lay in the hands of the class that
led the nationalist revolutions in Africa. The bourgeoisie class
that led nationalist movements suffered terribly from what Fanon
termed 'intellectual laziness.- It is a disease of failure
to transcend the immanent logic of colonialism together with its
re-production of racism and ethnicity. It is a failure in the bourgeois
class to commit class suicide and be truly representative of workers
and peasants. Just think of the Lancaster House Conference. Just
visualise Joshua Nkomo, Robert Mugabe and Abel Muzorewa, squabbling
over decolonisation of Zimbabwe with the British and Americans as
moderators. Then one would see the limits of the elites that led
us to where we are today. One would easily see where the revolution
lost its way. At least Nkomo and Mugabe pretended to be together
only to plunge the country into crisis barely two years into independence.
The colonially produced
bourgeoisie were and are a liability to the African emancipatory
project. Either they degenerate into open tribalism and plunge young
African nation into ethnic cleansing or they fall headlong into
embarrassing compromises with the colonialists and again plunge
the workers and peasants into non-freedom. At another level, they
degenerate into narcissism and victimhood and die railing against
imperialism and colonialism while butchering their citizens and
looting national resources ahead of peasants and workers. Indeed
the crisis of Africa is that 'the beautiful ones are not yet
born.- The 'other of bourgeoisie- that is currently
contesting power from the nationalist bourgeoisie produced by colonialism
also suffers terribly from ideological confusion. They tend to imbibe
lock, stock and barrel, notions of good governance, democracy, human
rights and even life-style audits unquestioningly. They find themselves
being blamed for being lackey of imperialism and colonialism. The
recent example of life-style audits being debated in South Africa
for instance does not take into account the hidden hand of those
focused on criminalisation of black accumulation of wealth and deflection
of popular focus from real causes of inequality bedevilling post-apartheid
period. The worst level is when black people engage in what is termed
'black-on-black- violence as part of the struggle to
achieve freedom. Xenophobia that rocked South Africa is a case in
point. 'Election cleansing- that engulfed Zimbabwe between
April and May is the second example. That level of degeneration
of consciousness is not forgivable.
The challenge is how
to renew the African national project without necessarily falling
into the tragedy of trying to turn our backs on the world and trying
to go it alone. Hatred of the world is not the answer. Militarisation
of state institutions is not the answer. Violence is not the answer.
Tribalism is not the answer. Racism is not the answer. We need to
guard against the pitfall of imagining the nation in racial terms
and fragmenting postcolonial states into tribal fiefdom(s). We still
need to think hard about terms of peaceful co-existence founded
on ethical politics of fair and just distribution of available resources.
If we think broader, they questions of the day revolve around three
pre-occupations: the search for freedom development and material
welfare; acceptance, belonging and citizenship; and finding ethical
conditions of human peaceful coexistence where diversity and difference
does not result into inequality and exclusion.
Not only Zimbabwe
had to rethink what it means to be free in the first place. South
Africa is experiencing a similar challenge. The current debates
in South Africa about 'life-style- audits and the Zimbabwean
debates of indigenisation and empowerment are all reflective of
the African search for a language to articulate pathologies of inequalities
and quest for ethical founded politics of fair distribution of wealth.
A recent presentation by Achille Mbembe on Fanon and decolonisation
held at the University of Witwatersrand set me thinking harder about
the trajectory of the African national project in general. Mbembe-s
presentation touched on key current debates on wealth and property;
and rights and entitlements in Africa that translates into idioms
of relations between people and things; opulence and hunger, and
manipulation of state control as an avenue to accumulation versus
pathologies of distribution. This is the challenge of our time and
we need to think carefully on these issues and thread cautiously
over the pitfalls of national consciousness that breed such tragedies
as xenophobia, racism, tribalism and genocides that have disunited
the masses of our people and limited our quest for universal emancipation.
We long for a new humanity where African hatred of the self dies.
It is African hatred of the self induced by colonialism that enable
the thirsty to 'annihilate- and 'de-capacitate-
one another easily whenever we are hungry and whenever there are
elections.
*Dr. Sabelo
J. Ndlovu-Gatsheni is a Zimbabwean academic writing from Johannesburg
in South Africa. He can be contacted by email: sgatsha@yahoo.co.uk
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|