|
Back to Index
Taking
an HIV test in Zimbabwe: A personal experience
Fugai Machirori, Partners Zimbabwe Key Correspondent
March 08, 2010
This is an open
account of my recent experience at the New Start Voluntary Counselling
and Testing (VCT) Centre in Union Avenue, Harare, which I feel is
important to share.
As many of us know, testing
for HIV is an important entry point for individuals to make informed
decisions about their health. If a person tests negative, this provides
an opportunity for them to take up, or continue to make use of,
proven HIV prevention measures such as abstinence, monogamy and
consistent and correct use of condoms.
If a person tests HIV
positive, then this acts as a gateway to positive living which may
include adoption of a healthier lifestyle and the commencement of
ARV treatment, where CD4 test results are low enough to warrant
this.
I give this background
to set up the scenario for the test I undertook early in February
as part of a general investigation into the quality of HIV testing
and counselling services across centres.
Since the test is such
a crucial entry point to so many other health-seeking behaviours,
it is of utmost importance that patients feel comfortable throughout
the process of both counselling and testing.
One of my initial concerns
was with a group information session. The counsellor gave a group
of us this session before we engaged in the one-on-one pre-test
counselling sessions. The group was large, about ten people or so,
which is understandable as the demand for the service is high.
The first problem arose
when the counsellor asked what language to conduct the session in.
Most of the group wanted the session to be conducted in Shona but
two gentlemen raised issue with the fact that they weren-t
fluent in the language. So they had to lose out to the majority.
However, a compromise was reached as the counsellor used 'Shonglish-;
a hybrid of Shona and English, throughout the session.
In all honesty, I think
she only managed to sprinkle five English words into the whole session;
barely enough to ensure that the non-Shona speakers could fully
understand the communication.
For me, that just isn-t
good enough. That information session is so important for people
who know nothing about HIV, AIDS and TB as it gives them an idea
of how HIV is transmitted and functions in the human body, and also
how untreated opportunistic infections can lead to AIDS. This is
important information that we should never assume all people know.
After that session, we
were told to go and sit in the waiting room and wait to be called
for counselling.
The counsellor assigned
to me was a woman who seemed very disinterested in the task of counselling.
In fact all she asked me to tell her was where I lived, my age and
what brought me to the centre for a test. There was no real dialogue
being sought here, just the basic facts about who I was, which is
definitely not the way to create a safe environment for a client.
In fact, I am certain
that before a counsellor begins the process of counselling a person,
they should ask the client if they are comfortable with the counsellor,
or if they feel that they would be more communicative with a counsellor
who is younger, older or of the opposite sex etc.
None of this was asked
of me. Also, the counsellor didn-t even ask me if I wanted
the session conducted in Shona but chose to assume that I understood
the language and proceeded to direct the counselling session completely
in Shona.
As she asked her questions,
I began to question in my head whether this would be the type of
counsellor that people, particularly young people, would feel they
could confide in. I mean, even if she asked, I don-t think
anyone would feel too comfortable divulging their sexual history
to a person so obviously unapproachable.
Ultimately, the counselling
function of the process is about creating a relationship from the
beginning of the journey right to the end, by trying to ensure that
the client doesn-t drop out at any stage of the process.
After having my blood
drawn, I went back to sit in the waiting room of people, all anticipating
their results.
One particularly twitchy
young man who had kept his ear phones plugged in throughout the
waiting period finally succumbed to whatever battle was waging within
himself and walked hastily out of the room. Throughout my 20-minute
wait, I did not see him return. His fears must have overcome his
will.
As I continued to think
about him, I heard a voice call me for the post-test session.
And there was yet another
problem: my post-test counsellor was different to the counsellor
I had been with prior to the test.
Like I said, my understanding
of the HIV counselling process is that it's about building trust
and a relationship that must be strong enough to endure any eventuality
that might come at the end of the journey. For example, providing
convincing counselling that must influence, in some way, the client-s
health-seeking decisions thereafter.
This cannot be achieved
through the switching and mixing of counsellors. One counsellor,
whom the client has identified as a comfortable confidant should
be used throughout the process.
Perhaps my final concern
is the biggest the one.
As the post-test counsellor
prepared to show me my results, she asked me a deeply loaded question,
"Are you sure you
won-t kill yourself if you find that you are HIV positive
today?"
If that isn-t the
epitome of the very stigma that we are trying to conquer through
testing, then I don-t know what is. How can a counsellor speak
in that way and even suggest such a negative reaction to a positive
test as death?
It-s one thing
to say people are coming in their droves to get tested, and this
is probably why the centre is unable to meet the high quality of
standards that is each client-s right. But it isn-t
a good enough excuse.
I hope this matter will
be looked into with all seriousness.
Email: fmachirori@yahoo.com
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|