|
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
Inclusive government - Index of articles
The false unity in Zimbabwe
Robert
I. Rotberg, The Boston Globe
June 13, 2009
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/06/13/the_false_unity_in_zimbabwe/
Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai of Zimbabwe, who visited President
Obama yesterday, needs all the American support he can get. Although
the head of government of an impoverished and beleaguered nation
battered by a decade of severe mismanagement and corruption, Tsvangirai
is hardly in charge. President Robert Mugabe is still calling too
many of the crucial governing shots.
For that reason,
Washington has been reluctant to help significantly to reconstruct
Zimbabwe. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has wisely moved slowly,
despite Tsvangirai's requests. Mugabe uses incoming funds to strengthen
his own power, never to benefit the people. If assistance could
be channeled directly to Tsvangirai, and the ministries he controls,
then Washington could invest sensibly in Zimbabwe.
Tsvangirai's
Movement for Democratic Change won a parliamentary election in 2008
against Mugabe's Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front
(ZANU-PF). But Mugabe and his security forces refused to acknowledge
their defeat, and kept on ruling. Finally, after brokering by South
Africa and the Southern African Development Community in February,
Mugabe and Tsvangirai created a unity government, with each side
having a number of cabinet ministries, district governors, and so
on.
Mugabe has
not honoured his side of the bargain, leaving Tsvangirai to soldier
on as prime minister with truncated powers. Mugabe reappointed the
governor of the central bank and the attorney general despite Tsvangirai's
protests and an earlier promise that those positions would report
to the prime minister. The central bank governor was responsible
for printing un-backed local currency and driving Zimbabwe last
year into 100,000 percent inflation, the highest in the world. He
also supplied Mugabe and Mugabe's wife with cash for their own personal
uses. The attorney general was and still is responsible for questionable
prosecutions and the brutal treatment of MDC politicians and supporters.
Mugabe's appointed
minister of communications has insisted that restrictions on who
can report for the local and world media still pertain, despite
Tsvangirai's recent declaration that such restrictions were null
and void.
Tsvangirai
has decreed an end to farm invasions and misappropriations of land,
and Mugabe has declared that they must continue.
Mugabe's canny
concession of limited power to Tsvangirai has saddled the Movement
for a Democratic Change with refloating the country's economy under
Finance Minister Tendai Biti, and with such tasks as turning on
electric power after years of foreign exchange shortages and frequent
power outages.
Mugabe and
Tsvangirai jointly control the Minister of Home Affairs, which runs
the police. But the police, still locking up MDC followers, and
even torturing them, ignore Tsvangirai. So do the security forces.
The military's Joint Operations Command was supposed to have been
replaced by a National Security Council, in which Tsvangirai would
have preponderant voice. But the Council has not yet met.
The so-called
unity government is hardly unified. Tsvangirai and many of his supporters
believe that Mugabe's many violations cannot continue indefinitely,
and that ZANU-PF backers will soon realize that Mugabe's malevolent
hand must be stayed. Tsvangirai, in other words, is attempting to
introduce democracy across the board in Zimbabwe by gradual accretion,
assuming that right will surely triumph.
But Mugabe,
insufferably confident and arrogant at 85, hardly wants to be upstaged
by his much younger prime minister. He seeks to protect himself
and his security cronies from being investigated for corrupt dealings
and human rights abuses. The destruction of a prosperous, largely
democratic Zimbabwe happened on their watch. The blood of thousands
is on their hands.
Washington
needs to back Tsvangirai vigorously. Clinton should pressure the
new South African government and the South African Development Community
to remove Mugabe. She could use the moral power of her office to
impress upon African national leaders that Mugabe must go and the
unity government be led exclusively by Tsvangirai. But it is too
soon to supply substantial aid to a nation-state still manipulated
by Mugabe's despotism.
*Robert
I. Rotberg directs Harvard Kennedy School's Program on Intrastate
Conflict and is president of the World Peace Foundation.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|