|
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
Inclusive government - Index of articles
Spotlight on inclusive government: It's not working - Index of articles
New Constitution-making process - Index of articles
Scramble for a Constitution
Arkmore
Kori
June 01, 2009
The top key
priority of the recently presented Short Term Emergency Recovery
Programme (STERP) is to address political and governance issues
through facilitating a constitutional making process. Ever since
its formation in 1997, the National
Constitutional Assembly has been trying to campaign for a new
constitution. A tug of war has arisen, and both parties advocate
for a 'people driven constitution-. Notwithstanding
the tricky questions regarding who are the 'people-,
where are they in this conflict and how they are going to 'drive-
the constitutional process, more important questions come up: Is
this scramble worthwhile in our current situation? Are Zimbabweans
starving for a constitution? Do we really need a new constitution
now and who cares following it?
The value of a constitution
to a layperson, who is supposed to 'drive- its making,
is far-fetched. It is not clear how a new constitution would bring
water to the urban population to prevent future cholera crisis.
For those that have lost their loved ones in narrow and badly maintained
roads such as the Harare-Masvingo highway, it is difficult to see
how a constitution would lead to the widening and maintenance of
roads to minimise accidents.
A rural household in
Nsenga community, Binga, would think twice if invited to demonstrate
for a new constitution because it is difficult to see how it brings
food to the table and more importantly, chase away elephants that
destroy crops - year in and year out - subjecting them to
lingering poverty. Students from tertiary institutions who run battles
with the police for demonstrating against high fees would question
how, under a new constitution, they will be able to afford their
education. Those lucky enough to complete wonder how it would create
employment.
We have seen politicians
and the powerful choosing to ignore a constitution, or just amending
it to fulfil their wishes. Those who broke the electoral rules by
delaying the release of March 2008 election results by at least
a month are moving freely in the streets. Under the nose of the
Government of National Unity, Southern Africa Development Community
and the civil society, farm invasions have continued unabated for
almost a month now, and none has been brought to book. We have witnessed
some of the most traumatic violation of prison laws in the country-s
history, but the culprits are languishing freely in the streets.
No one has cared to prosecute them. It takes time and resources
to make a constitution, but only a few seconds to breach it, and
of course, getting away with it.
I am not dismissing the
importance of a constitution, but it does not warrant such a scramble
at the moment. For example, few questions emerge: How can we talk
about a new constitution if we are not able to respect the present
constitution? What guarantee do we have that the hard-core politicians
who have deliberately wrecked the current constitution will respect
a new constitution? A new constitution, without a change of behaviour
and attitudes of some of our politicians and leaders who see themselves
as above the law will not make any difference. Indeed, most would
appreciate jostle for building dams and establishing irrigation
schemes so that we can have enough, affordable food; competition
for resuscitating our industries and economy so that we get employment;
competition for providing bursaries, loans or grants for students
or scramble for constructing roads, among others. The need for a
constitution would inevitably avail itself in the processes of economic
and social transition.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|