Back to Index

This article participates on the following special index pages:

Catch more flies with honey
Heidi Holland, The Star (SA)
April 13, 2009

http://www.zwnews.com/issuefull.cfm?ArticleID=20633

Hope in their president's sincerity seems to linger among Zimbabweans. Predatory though Robert Mugabe is known to be, it persists because, without it, such cautious optimism as exists in the country's fragile unity government would not be sustainable. The hope hovers, mind you, alongside desperation and the ever-present fear that Mugabe is swallowing the country's opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) python-like, just as he did Joshua Nkomo many years ago. Everybody knows how unlikely the chances are of Zimbabwe's dictator becoming a reformed man at 85. What he clearly wants badly enough to play the game, though, is the Western development money that was hitherto proffered on condition of his departure. Only donors can kick-start the beleaguered nation's economy, in the process keeping Mugabe in office until he dies.

It is an awkward situation for Western governments to resolve while struggling with daunting economic problems of their own. Will they support the shakiest of political alliances out of pity for ordinary Zimbabweans at the risk of being outwitted by one of the least popular of the world's dictators? Probably not. The only way Zimbabwe will get international development dosh with Comrade Bob at the helm is if he succeeds in bamboozling foreign governments into thinking he is a reformed character. That he has undertaken such an apparently impossible public relations mission says much about Mugabe's enduring belief in his ability to outsmart absolutely anybody. Ironically, Mugabe's biggest ally in the campaign to convince hard-nosed Western politicians that he suddenly cares for his people in the same way as Morgan Tsvangirai cares for Zimbabweans is none other than the prime minister himself.

At a press conference in Harare last month, Mugabe's erstwhile enemy responded irritably when a journalist referred to Zimbabwe's despot simply as Mugabe: "It's President Mugabe," Tsvangirai snapped. In an interview with me during the run-up to the power-sharing arrangement, the MDC leader described a long dinner he had had with Mugabe in a Harare restaurant - when the two got up close and personal for the first time - as "a lost father-son reunion". At a time when most of the global media were attacking Tsvangirai's willingness to make peace with the dictator, he added forthrightly: "I actually have to admit that I have some respect for Mugabe, who used to be my hero." Tsvangirai's unabashed respect for the much older Mugabe - based on a deeply held African veneration of the aged, which comes naturally to the well-mannered prime minister - is one of the unity government's few strengths amid multiple potential deal-breakers.

Continuing land grabs, human rights abuses, harassment and imprisonment of MDC supporters, as well as Mugabe's fraudulent cabinet appointments, could yet derail the uneasy coalition. It is Tsvangirai's attitude towards Mugabe that will hold the unity government together. Mugabe will take full political advantage of his prime minister's respect while also genuinely appreciating it - as is his contradictory wont. And, who knows, Tsvangirai may be wilier in his courtesy than we think. If ever a man craved respect, it is Mugabe. Had former British prime minister Tony Blair sized him up accurately in all his human frailty as well as bluster when the two first started spitting at each other in the late 1990s, Blair could have put an arm (metaphorically, if not literally) around his African counterpart - who felt humiliated by New Labour's rejection of old policy - and slipped Mugabe the disputed land redistribution funding promised by an earlier government, possibly sparing Zimbabwe a decade of suffering. Pragmatic reconciliations have been a feature of diplomacy throughout history, after all.

Blair's failure to patch things up with Mugabe before the situation in Zimbabwe became totally toxic probably had a bit to do with the British leader's intuitive arrogance, something to do with New Labour's unholy alliance with the right-wing British media, and a lot to do with perceived as well as real Western disrespect towards African leaders. Well, hell, no, you might argue: discredited leaders, African or otherwise, forfeit respect. True. But there is little doubt that people like Mugabe, former president Thabo Mbeki and now ANC president Jacob Zuma - all of whom have come from a traditional leadership system akin to that of medieval England - become so accustomed to widespread deference, indeed adulation, at home that they simply can't tolerate the slights of strangers. Add to that formidable narcissistic barrier the inferiority complexes bequeathed to so many in Africa by colonialism and white settler rule and you have a compelling psycho-drama for Western power brokers (including the media) to fathom - or ignore at the African country's peril.

A few months ago, a US diplomat told me how difficult it had been to engage with South Africa while Mbeki was at the helm because Mbeki, lugging around a sizeable chip on his shoulder, simply refused to deal with anyone other than the supreme leader of the world's superpower. "It makes doing international business very difficult," the American sighed. Similarly, a British government official engaged in public health in South Africa said she felt obliged to bow and scrape to former health minister Manto Tshabalala-Msimang; nowadays she is free free to treat Health Minister Barbara Hogan, who understands Western manners, with normal rather than exaggerated respect. Daily, the independent local media bear the brunt of our leadership's intolerance of criticism or, sometimes, of informal journalistic behaviour. You might argue that this sensitivity should not be factored into the methods and logic by which power and its abuses are challenged.

True. But there are petty humiliations that could be resisted without compromising press freedom. Such an unnecessary taunt, which ran on the front page of a daily newspaper recently, showed Zuma flipping "the bird" to the camera. In fact, he was using his middle finger to push his glasses back on to his nose. Was this an example of amusing photography or a cheap shot? Rude signs that convey contempt to those with the muscle to react oppressively may not be the way to go in these days of reckless rule. Which reminds me: Zimbabwe's draconian media laws remain unaltered, not surprisingly. Of all the unity government's designated reforms, Mugabe can be expected to resist this one the longest. Why? Because journalism's job is to confront politicians with their failures. Mugabe, having contemplated nothing but his omnipotence for decades, will hardly be keen to encounter an accurate view of himself now.

Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.

TOP