|
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
Inclusive government - Index of articles
The three men who run the Zimbabwe government
Denford
Magora
April 09, 2009
http://denfordmagora.blogspot.com/2009/04/three-men-who-run-zimbabwe-government.html
Not long ago, Dr Simba
Makoni spoke about what he called the "classic Yes Minister
style" of Zimbabwe's government. For those who do not know,
Yes Minister is a British comedy set in Whitehall, the seat of the
government of the United Kingdom.
In the comedy, people
like Sir Humphrey actually run government business, telling a minister
what he can and can not do, getting up to all sorts of tricks to
ensure that their agenda (which they say is the national agenda),
carries the day.
Dr Makoni mentioned the
issue of speeches, for instance. When he took over at the Ministry
of Finance, he found that his speeches were written for him by the
civil servants. Worse, these speeches would not be given to him
until just before he got into his car to go to the function where
they were to be delivered.
To get around this, and
being a fully technologically literate person, he asked for a computer
to be put into his office. He also demanded that the computer be
given Internet and intranet access. He wanted to ensure that communication
within the ministry could be done via email instead of pieces of
paper.
He also announced that
he would be using his own Internet-based email, which the government
can not hack into. This, remember, was the year 2000! After much
resistance, it was done. As for speeches, he started writing his
own. Civil servants in his ministry took him to task about this,
saying there were people who could write the stuff for him. He resisted.
It is no exaggeration to say that as a result of the resistance
to change in the civil service and their need to control the ministers,
the clash with these functionaries contributed to the eventually
departure of Dr Makoni from the government. You see, Mugabe uses
the civil service to spy on his ministers, in addition to the usual
spying on them done by the CIO, the Intelligence Organisation.
Hence, the three most
powerful men in government (as opposed to in the country) are:
1. George
Charamba
As the spokesman
to Mugabe, he has immense influence with the man, especially since
Mugabe is insulated from the public and does not interact or even
remotely socialise with his ministers. The daily briefings he gets
from Charamba and the opinion and advice that is shared between
them has made Charamba Mugabe's ears and eyes on the administrative
side of government.
For the other eyes and
ears functions, Mugabe has the Central Intelligence Organisation
of course, although even these are out favour to an extent now.
Charamba is really so powerful only because, working with Mugabe,
it is understood that only Mugabe can fire him. Hence those in government,
including cabinet ministers, see him as untouchable.
2. Mariyawanda
Nzuwa
As head of the
Civil Service Commission, he approves all appointments below the
Deputy Minister level. He is the one who drafts the original list
of Permanent Secretaries and where they are assigned. He and George
Charamba are the ones who drafted that list of Permanent Secretaries
which Morgan Tsvangirai said was null and void.
This issue is
still to be settled and you will see in the end who is more powerful
by just how many of Nzuwa and Charamba's original PermSecs are kept
on in the new line up. Tsvangirai has told his staff that he is
going to be "professional" and will even keep well known
ZANU PF PermSecs in ministries run by the MDC if they are well qualified.
3. Misheck
Sibanda
As Secretary
to the President and Cabinet, Sibanda (and before him Utete) has
actually had a direct influence in decisions on which ministers
Mugabe fires and which ones he keeps when he reshuffles. Apart from
the ministries that Mugabe himself has an interest in, such as Women's
Affairs, Agriculture and the old Ministry of Political Affairs as
well as the Ministers of State he appoints within his office, all
other recommendations were done by Sibanda, who then consulted Charamba
before the list was presented to Mugabe for his final vetting.
If there was someone
on the list that Mugabe had a personal vendetta against, then the
name would jump up at him and the fellow would be removed without
question. All other "lesser" ministries sailed through.
Sibanda was, therefore,
heavily lobbied by ZANU PF politicians who wanted themselves or
their favourites to be given jobs. This is how people like Bright
Matonga ended in jobs that were too big for them - recommendations
to Sibanda from ZANU PF politicians who were interested in "tribal
balance". Apart from this procedure, Mugabe's only guidance,
especially in the last ten years or so, has been to tell these men
what sort of cabinet he wanted.
So, he would quietly
let be known that this time he wanted a "technocrat cabinet"
and the President's Men would scour for suitable new faces. In the
last "technocrat" cabinet, three names suggested by these
men were removed by Mugabe himself, who said one of them had been
a supporter of Forum, the opposition party of the early 1990s which
was led by the retired First Black Chief Justice of Zimbabwe: Enoch
Dumbutshena.
Recently, after the formation
of the Inclusive Government, these men have continued as though
nothing has changed and Mugabe appears to be backing them, perhaps
because they have gained his trust. They are still doing some damage,
flexing their muscles.
For instance, you will
notice that James Maridadi is no longer quoted by the Herald, the
government daily newspaper. In the first days of the GNU, the Herald
referred to him as the Spokesman for The Prime Minister.
It was Charamba personally
who issued the order to The Herald that Maridadi was not the spokesman
for the Prime Minister of Zimbabwe. Instead, he is Tsvangirai's
spokesman at the party level, so he was to be quoted only when Tsvangirai
was speaking on matter to do with his party and not the government.
Hence, effectively, Maridadi
has been banned from the pages of the Herald. Look carefully and
you will see that the paper now refers to the "Prime Minister's
Office", as in "The Prime Minister's Office confirmed...",
without mentioning any names.
Misheck Sibanda is the
man whom Mugabe uses as a sounding board to gauge the effectiveness
of his ministers. Sibanda's reports are taken seriously by Mugabe,
who is very much a protocol person, schooled in the old English
style where rules are rules and must be followed even if they are
silly.
In other words, the Yes
Minister school of government....Of the three, Nzuwa's powers are
perhaps the most sweeping of all, considering the breadth of senior
government appointments he controls.
In fact, it would not
be an exaggeration to say Nzuwa can either make or break the career
of a minister, especially the lesser ones (the big fish he would
not even dream of touching are Emmerson Mnangagwa, Sydney Sekeramayi,
Joice Mujuru, VP Msika, Didymus Mutasa, Joseph Made and, lately
added to the list, Kembo Mohadi. All others are fair game to him.
Morgan Tsvangirai realises
this, and it sunk home for him on the day he was summoned to explain
himself at Sate House after he issued that statement saying the
appointment of Permanent Secretaries was null and void. He walked
back into his Munhumutapa Offices the next day shaking his head,
telling his staff that Mugabe was not in control of government.
Why?
Because Mugabe's had
apparently asked Tsvangirai if he had not had input into the selection
of PermSecs. He further went on to say, " Did I sign those
appointment papers? I can not remember, I signed so many papers
yesterday, these young men brought me so many papers...."
Which means that the
career of PermSecs were being decided by these three men in the
name of Mugabe. If Tsvangirai had not objected, they would have
gotten away with it, the new PermSecs would have known to whom they
owed their allegiance and their ministers would have been simply
figure heads, without any power over the civil servants in their
ministries.
And by the way, the reason
this PermSec thing is being drawn out like this is because Mugabe
said to Tsvangirai, and here I am quoting a source within the PM's
office: "Prime Minister, what you should do is take the CVs
of these people and look at them, see which ones are not qualified
and then lets get back together and hear your thinking."
Today, Monday 06 April
2009, the PM and the Prez will meet at State House and Tsvangirai
is supposed to point out the ones on the list of PermSecs whom he
believes are not qualified. If Mugabe agrees, then they will go.
If not they will stay. Tsvangirai was not given the option to get
rid of them on political grounds, because Mugabe maintains that
his is a professional civil service. He still claims that no party
interests inform their decisions, only national interests.
So, in essence, Tsvangirai
can not fire any of them on the grounds that they are "ZANU
PF" because he would not be able to prove it. As you know,
our PermSecs do not make political speeches. The only time they
make public speeches would be when they have to read a policy speech
on behalf of a busy minister.
Most times, the minister
is told what he would have said at such gatherings later, because
he would not have written speech at all.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|