|
Back to Index
Mamdani, Mugabe & the African scholarly community: Africanisation
of exploitation
Horace
Campbell, Pambazuka News
December 18, 2008
http://www.pambazuka.org/en/category/features/52845
Concerned scholars
should revitalise their opposition to Zimbabwe-s Mugabe regime,
writes Horace Campbell. While being against any form of opportunistic,
external intervention in the country, Campbell argues that scholars
must come to offer an effective challenge to ZANU-PF-s persistent
retreat into spurious anti-imperialist discourse. Heavily critical
of writers like Mahmood Mamdani for echoing ZANU-PF-s claims
around the effects of economic sanctions levied against Zimbabwe,
Campbell argues that blocking international payments would prove
a far more efficacious means of tackling Mugabe-s misappropriation
of funds.
It was most
apt that on the 60th anniversary of the UN Universal Declaration
of Human Rights a group of 200 scholars at the 12th congress of
CODESRIA expressed their concern over the threats of military intervention
in Zimbabwe. The scholars pointed to the detrimental effects of
military intervention, noting that:
'Military
interventions exacerbate political and socio-economic crises and
internal differences with profoundly detrimental and destructive
regional implications. We recognize that threats of military intervention
come from imperialist powers, and also through their African proxies.-
These scholars
were signaling their opposition to the vocal calls for the removal
of Robert Mugabe by the Secretary of State of the United States
and by the British Prime Minister, Gordon Brown. Archbishop Desmond
Tutu of South Africa and the Prime Minister of Kenya, Raila Odinga,
had earlier raised the call for the removal of Robert Mugabe by
the force of arms.
This scholar
joins with African people everywhere who welcome the alertness of
our colleagues against foreign military intervention. I also welcome
their concern for the appalling situation in Zimbabwe.
It is important
that the Mugabe government and the spokespersons for ZANU-PF do
not consider the statement by scholars as an endorsement for the
appalling tragedy that has befallen the Zimbabwean poor and exploited.
After all, these CODESRIA scholars termed what is happening in Zimbabwe
'a nightmare-.
This was in
the same week that President Mugabe argued that the imperialists
were planning a military invasion and that the cholera outbreak
had been based on biological warfare against Zimbabwe. The Minister
of Information went further and in a statement in the Herald newspaper
the minister claimed:
'The cholera
epidemic in Zimbabwe is a serious biological chemical war force,
a genocidal onslaught on the people of Zimbabwe by the British.
Cholera is a calculated racist terrorist attack on Zimbabwe by the
unrepentant former colonial power which has enlisted support from
its American and Western allies so that they invade the country.-
This claim by
Dr Sikhanyiso Ndlovu was an insult to the intelligence of humans
everywhere in so far as cholera is an acute intestinal infection
caused by unsanitary conditions. The key to prevention of the disease
is simple: clean water.
It is because
of the simple nature of the cure that the response of the Zimbabwe
government to the death of more than 1,000 persons is one more callous
response to the exploitation and brutal oppression of the Zimbabwean
working peoples. Biological warfare is a serious matter not to be
used for games of crying 'wolf-. One world figure is
already leaving the stage with the record of this kind of crying
wolf in Iraq.
While this writer
will oppose any form of external military intervention by imperialists,
it is important that concerned and progressive scholars oppose the
crude anti-imperialism of the Zimbabwean political leadership under
Mugabe. This writer awaits equal concern from my colleagues over
the gender violence, repression of trade union leaders, wanton destruction
of lives by the Mugabe government and the brutal repression of ordinary
citizens.
At the same
time that the statement of concern was being signed human rights
activists were calling on the Zimbabwean government to account for
the whereabouts of Jestina Mukoko, director of the Zimbabwe
Peace Project (ZPP). Mukoko is only one of the more than 20
known human rights activists who have disappeared in the past six
weeks. Mukoko-s 15 year-old child saw his mother being abducted
from their home.
We must raise
our collective voices against such kidnapping and abduction while
opposing any imperialist plans for a military invasion of Zimbabwe.
One question that immediately came to mind after reading the CODESRIA
statement was whether our colleagues have become blind to the suffering
of ordinary people in their struggle against the latest and more
complex phase of imperialism in Africa.
Mugabe
and the exploitation of anti-racist and anti-imperialist sentiments
The Zimbabwe
government is very aware of the anti-imperialist and anti-racist
sentiments among oppressed peoples and thus has deployed a range
of propagandists inside and outside of the country in a bid to link
every problem in Zimbabwe to international sanctions by the EU and
USA. Anti-imperialists in the USA cite the Zimbabwe Reconstruction
and Development Act - passed by the US Congress in 2001 -
as being a source of economic woe for poor Zimbabweans. While the
scholars at the congress of CODESRIA hardly resorted to the same
kind of praise for Mugabe as their counterparts writing in the special
issue of Black Scholar, there is not enough evidence that there
was sufficient attention paid to the gross violation of basic rights.
If this debate did occur at the CODESRIA congress it was not reflected
in the statement.
One of the key
entrepreneurs of the Zimbabwe regime, John Bredenkamp, commands
considerable experience in manipulating the question of sanctions
for the enrichment of those in power, both in the time of Rhodesia
and now Zimbabwe. Bredenkamp started on his way to fortune by breaking
sanctions for Ian Smith. Bredenkamp has been involved in the politics
and economics of looting southern Africa and is one of the key props
of the ZANU-PF regime. His plundering activities also tie him to
the political and financial leaders in South Africa who are being
probed by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) in relation to the £100
million in bribes to ensure the sale of weapons to the South African
government. This author is calling on members of the CODESRIA network
to reveal their research findings on John Bredenkamp, Muller Conrad
Rautenbach (a.k.a. Billy Rautenbach) and to recommend the arrest
and charge of those involved in looting Zimbabwe and southern Africa.
Both Bredenkamp and Billy Rautenbach (of the white settler forces)
featured in the orgy of looting in the Democratic Republic of the
Congo (DRC) and established long term business relationships with
ZANU-PF-s leaders. John Bredenkamp had matured in the art
of manipulation while aligned with Ian Smith. He exulted in this
dual service to imperialism and to African nationalists with the
leadership of ZANU-PF, and his expertise has been placed at the
service of the crude accumulators within the South Africa-s
ANC.
Instead of oversimplifying
imperialist threats in Zimbabwe, those who want to see the demilitarisation
of Africa must aggressively support the exposure of the arms deals
that have linked Bredenkamp and Fana Hlongwane across the politics
of repression in South Africa and Zimbabwe. The British arms manufacturer
British Aerospace (Bae) has been involved with Bredenkamp and Hlongwane
in Africa, along with corrupt elements in the Middle East. There
have been calls for BAe to be prosecuted under the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act (FCPA) of the USA. Such an investigation would have
potentially seismic consequences for military contractors and arms
manufacturers and would provide another means of opposing Western
militarism in Africa.
Blaming
Zimbabwe-s problems on ZIDERA
The convergence
of fraud, corruption and cover-ups in South Africa, Zimbabwe and
Britain render simplistic conceptions of imperialism less than useful
for those who want to see peaceful change in Zimbabwe. The Mugabe
government blames all of its problems on the economic war launched
by the USA and Britain. For the Mugabe regime, at the core of this
economic war are the targeted sanctions against Mugabe-s top
lieutenants under its Zimbabwe Democracy and Economic Recovery Act
(ZIDERA), passed by the Bush administration in 2001.
What has been
clear from the hundreds of millions of dollars of investments by
British, Chinese, Malaysian, South African and other capitalists
in the Zimbabwe economy since 2003 is that the problems in Zimbabwe
have not been caused by an economic war against the country. Even
when facing pressure from the British government, Anglo-American
indicated its willingness in 2008 to invest an additional US$400
million to continue its control of platinum mines in Zimbabwe. What
has been most remarkable has been the ways in which the dictatorship
in Zimbabwe has destroyed the rights of workers in the mining sector
in order to facilitate and welcome foreign capitalists in the diamond
and mining sectors. Whole villages are being laid to waste in order
to support and welcome external diamond mining interests.
If human rights
activists and committed scholars were to expose the linkages between
ZANU-PF arms dealers John Bredenkamp and Fana Hlongwane along with
the wider linkages to international capital, then it would be clear
that it is quite an oversimplification to argue that ZIDERA is at
the centre of Zimbabwe-s problems. Bredenkamp had been schooled
from the Smith era to blame everything on sanctions while beating
the sanctions with the help of apartheid South Africa. In the present
period Bredenkamp is an ally of the ANC, ZANU-PF and British imperialist
arms manufacturers like BAe all at the same time. It is also important
for African scholars to join the call to the South African President
Kgalema Motlanthe for an arms deal judicial commission, in order
to bring to the attention of the wider public the dealings of individuals
such as Fana Hlongwane.
Scholars, while
alerting the world against foreign military invasion, must examine
the conduct of the Zimbabwe military and especially those ordering
Mugabe to remain in supreme control.
It is in the
interest of concerned scholars everywhere to understand the conditions
of farm labourers and mine workers in Zimbabwe. What was not expected
was for Professor Mahmood Mamdani to use his scholarly knowledge
to repeat ZANU-PF-s sham argument that economic sanctions
have aggravated the economic crisis in Zimbabwe. While the nationalists
have been crude in their fawning over the 'revolutionary-
credentials of Robert Mugabe, Mahmood Mamdani used his considerable
international reputation to line up support for the Mugabe regime
in a lengthy review published in the London Review of Books.
Is there
a democratic revolution going on in Zimbabwe?
From the outset
Mamdani located himself as a victim of forced expulsion, identifying
the forced expulsion of the Asians in Uganda with the expropriation
of the white setter farmers in Zimbabwe. In the process, Mamdani
compared Robert Mugabe to Idi Amin of Uganda. Mamdani went on to
explain the popularity of Amin-s economic war against Asians
and used the word 'popularity- in his characterisation
of the current ZANU-PF leadership. Very few would doubt the 'popularity-
of Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe and other parts of Africa in the period
of the anti-colonial struggles, but in the past fifteen years Mugabe
has turned the victories of the people into a never ending nightmare
of murders, killings, forced removal and brutal oppression. Idi
Amin remains popular in West Africa, just as Mugabe is popular in
West Africa and other parts of the world where there is not a full
understanding of the real tragedy of what is going on in Zimbabwe.
Idi Amin, like Robert Mugabe, is popular outside of his own country
for the wrong reasons.
Mahmood Mamdani
as a Ugandan is very aware of the extent to which the British government
supported elements within the Amin dictatorship while using the
British media to revile Africans in general, and Idi Amin in particular.
Amin (who was promoted by the British and the Israelis in the military
coup of January 1971) was useful as a propaganda tool for imperialism.
As a scholar who has written extensively on Uganda and on the politics
of fascism, Mahmood Mamdani is very aware of the role that Bob Astles
played as an agent of US and British imperialism in eastern Africa.
Bob Astles (ally and confidant of Idi Amin from 1966 to 1979) had
been implicated in the scandals involving looted gold from the Congo
in the 1960s and survived with Amin as a key confidant, until he
left for Britain when it became clear that the Tanzanian military
invasion of Uganda would succeed. Mahmood Mamdani had returned to
Uganda in 1979 in the military train of the Tanzanian military and
political forces. This was a case where Mamdani recognised that
it required regional African intervention to rid Africa of the manipulation
of the British and the brutal genocidal politics of Idi Amin.
Contrary to
his research on the Ugandan dictatorship, Mamdani-s research
skills seem underused while elaborating on the 'Lessons of
Zimbabwe-. Professor Mamdani has maintained that, 'In
social and economic - if not political - terms, this
was a democratic revolution. But there was a heavy price to pay.-
This line of
the 'democratic revolution- emanated from the Newtonian
concepts of hierarchy that had been internalised by some who have
called themselves Marxists. During the period of the Soviet Union,
this discourse was used to support so-called revolutionaries such
as Mengistu, the butcher of Ethiopia. Is it by chance that Mengistu
has found his refuge in Zimbabwe?
Under this 'democratic
revolutionary stage-, African capitalists had to accumulate
so that there would be a maturation of capitalism in Africa. Walter
Rodney refuted this 'stages- theory in his book, How
Europe Underdeveloped Africa. In that study Rodney established the
reality that there was a link between the development of capitalism
in Europe and the forms of plunder, looting and genocide in Africa.
Capitalism in Africa had been implanted in a very different form,
and all over the continent those who supported capitalism have used
the formulation of the 'democratic revolution- to support
black capitalists. This is nowhere more evident than in South Africa,
where the communist party, as one component of the tripartite alliance,
has used this formulation to silence itself in the face of the crudest
and fastest rate of accumulation by a fledgling capitalist class
in recent history.
In his elaboration
of 'the heavy price to pay- for this democratic revolution
in Zimbabwe, Mamdani noted the impact on: (a) -the rule of
law-; (b) Farm labourers; (c) The urban poor; and d) Food
production.
What was most
contradictory about Mamdani-s line of argument is that while
he recognises the impact of the policies of the Mugabe government
on the urban poor and farm workers, he expends a great deal of his
analysis on a critique of the absence of donor support for the people
of Zimbabwe. Before the era of neoliberalism and the pseudo-humanitarianism
of the so-called international non-governmental structure, these
donors would have been called imperialists and there would have
been a call for the government of Zimbabwe to use its resources
to provide clean water, sanitation and healthcare for its people.
Robert Mugabe and ZANU-PF have selectively implemented a home grown
neoliberal agenda to enrich one of the crudest of the capitalist
classes in Africa while depending on international imperialist agencies
to provide social services for the people. Mamdani overlooks the
fact that the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange has been posting the most
profitable gains under the Mugabe regime.
Mamdani
is wrong
While the discussion
about whether Zimbabwe is going through a 'democratic-
revolution can be debated, Mamdani is wrong on numerous grounds.
As a scholar who has written on genocide, it is curious why he left
out the close relationship between the leaders of the Interahamwe
and the Zimbabwean military in the DRC. Mugabe-s military
trained those had committed genocide in Rwanda to fight for Laurent
Kabila. He is simply wrong to use tribal formulations to describe
the sharp class divide in Zimbabwe. It is here that the consistency
of the donor language corresponds to the language of ethnic divisions
in Zimbabwe. In describing the manipulation of Mugabe, Mamdani noted:
'Very
early on, the colonial bureaucracy had translated the ethnic mosaic
of the country into an administrative map in such a way as to allow
minimum co-operation and maximum competition between different ethnic
groups and areas, ensuring among other things that labour for mining,
manufacture and service was not recruited from areas where peasants
were needed on large farms or plantations. These areas, as it happened,
were mainly Shona and so, unsurprisingly, when the trade-union movement
developed in Rhodesia, its leaders were mostly Ndebele, and had
few links with the Shona leadership of the peasant-based liberation
movement (Mugabe belongs to the Shona majority).-
What is this
language of Shona majority? Is this not the old tribal discourse
of the colonial anthropologists?
Mahmood Mamdani-s
benign criticisms cannot disguise the reality that his submission
has been represented as one component of the anti-imperialist intellectual
support for the Mugabe regime. Despite the atrocities, killings
and abductions of grassroots activists, Mamdani has managed to use
the term 'popularity- in the same sentence while describing
the current Zimbabwe leadership. Nowhere did this writer take note
of the fact that this 'popular- government withheld
the election results in March 2008 for over a month. Mamdani says
there is a democratic revolution at a high price. Indeed at the
price of democracy itself and in its most simple expression: the
right to vote.
Writing this
backhanded support for Robert Mugabe and ZANU-PF as a review of
a number of books on Zimbabwe, Mamdani was inordinately dependent
on the scholarship of those from the Agrarian Institute for African
Studies in Zimbabwe. The papers from this institute have been fulsome
in their praise of the 'land reform- process in Zimbabwe.
The authors of these papers supporting Mugabe were the very same
ones claiming that the horrors of 'Operation Murambatsvina-
(the operation to round up hundreds of thousands of citizens) were
exaggerated by the Western media.
Neither Mamdani
nor the scholars from CODESRIA have expressed their outrage in relation
to the repression and forced removal of 750,000 people from Zimbabwe-s
urban areas in 2005. If a white government had done this there would
have been outrage. Current scholarly work on the displacement of
Zimbabwean farm workers by Amanda Hammar will assist future scholarship
focused on the reintegration of individuals scattered across Southern
Africa. These citizens suffered from the xenophobic attacks against
poor migrants in South Africa.
While merely
recycling the scholarship of this agrarian institute, Mahmood Mamdani
was careful to hedge his bets in noting that: 'What land reform
has meant or may come to mean for Zimbabwe-s economy is still
hotly disputed.-
What is not
in dispute is that the policies of the Mugabe government have destroyed
the agricultural sector in Zimbabwe. In our examination of the fast
track land seizures in the book, Reclaiming Zimbabwe: The Exhaustion
of the Patriarchal Model of Liberation, we exposed the reality that
an examination of land reform cannot be separated from water, seeds,
fertilizers and most importantly, the labour that has worked on
a piece of land. It is on the question of workers and labour where
one would have expected Mamdani to have drawn on the scholarship
of Brian Raftopoulos and Lloyd Sachikonye. It is not too late to
recommend to Mahmood Mamdani two books that will shed light on the
relationship between land and labour: Striking Back: The Labour
Movement and the Post-Colonial State in Zimbabwe, 1980-2000,
edited by Brian Raftopoulos and Lloyd Sachikonye; and Lloyd Sachikonye,
The Situation of Commercial Farm Workers after Land Reform in Zimbabwe.
Idi
Amin and Bob Astles; Robert Mugabe and John Berdenkamp
Qualifications
on the disputed outcome of the 'land reform- by Mahmood
Mamdani should not derail committed scholarship on what a democratic
land reform process could yield in the new southern Africa when
there is serious decolonisation instead of the Africanisation of
exploitation. Mamdani-s analysis could not hide the reality
that there is a capitalist class that is profiting from the misery
and exploitation of the peoples of Zimbabwe. The present divide
in Zimbabwe that is manipulated under ethnic terms cannot hide the
opulence and disparity between those with power and the exploitation
of millions, with hundreds dying of cholera. The billions of dollars
being exported by those in the regime, along with the leadership
of the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe, will only come to light when scholars,
in general, and African scholars, in particular, support the UN
Stolen Assets Recovery Initiative. African dictators from the Sudan
to Equatorial Guinea and looters from Nigeria and Angola to Kenya
want African scholars to be silent on the repatriation of stolen
wealth. This writer opposes all sanctions against Zimbabwe (including
ZIDERA) because sanctions do not work when there are experienced
entrepreneurs such as John Bredenkamp and Billy Rautenbach in the
service of ZANU-PF. What is far more important is a full analysis
of Gideon Gono-s exportation of money at the Reserve Bank
of Zimbabwe. As a scholars in universities with the space and resources
to do research, it is our collective duty in the context of an Obama
administration to call on the US Justice Department to prosecute
those of the British firm BAe who have been involved in corruption
and fraud in southern Africa.
Additionally,
African scholars and progressives must pressure the Obama administration
to use the resources of the Treasury Department of the Office of
Foreign Assets Control to democratise the information on the billions
of dollars being stolen from Africa, and in this case, southern
Africa.
As in the case
of Idi Amin, imperialism can be very selective in releasing the
information of the theft and export of capital by the Mugabe leadership.
In the past month the Treasury Department of the United States Office
of Foreign Assets Control slapped further sanctions on John Bredenkamp.
There is need
for concerted research and exposure of the continued role of elements
such as Bredenkamp and the alliance with those in the South African
government who are profiting from the misery and exploitation of
the Zimbabwean people. Is it by accident that the same forces aligned
with Bredenkamp also supported the 'quiet diplomacy-
of Thabo Mbeki? The countries of the European Union are also complicit
in the looting of Zimbabwe. Decent individuals in Europe and concerned
African scholars must pressure the democratic forces in Belgium
to call on the Belgian Central Bank to expose the amounts of money
being exported by Gideon Gono on behalf of Robert Mugabe and the
dictatorship. The international banking system now relies on a network
administered by Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication
(SWIFT) based at La Hulpe outside Brussels. SWIFT links 7,800 financial
institutions in 205 countries, including Zimbabwe-s banks,
and processes about US$6 trillions- worth of transactions
each day. Although owned by banks, SWIFT specifically falls under
the control of central banks and, in particular, the control of
the Belgian Central Bank. Instead of speculating on whether the
Mugabe regime is exporting US$9 or US$15 billion every year, the
exposure of the head of the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe is far more
important than talks of removing Mugabe by force. Blocking international
payments is far quicker and more effective than trade or other sanctions.
This strategy can also be reversed as soon as its objectives are
reached, without permanent damage to the economy or its infrastructure.
Committed
scholars should be outraged at what is happening in Zimbabwe
People are being
killed and brutalised. Homophobia and virginity tests reflect the
most extreme forms of patriarchy and deformed masculinity in Zimbabwe.
The women who bear the brunt of this oppression have called for
international solidarity. Under the leadership of the group, Women
of Zimbabwe Arise (WOZA), these brave fighters have exposed
those who mobilise sophisticated post-modernists and anti-imperialist
discourse to support Robert Mugabe. Zimbabwean workers are being
assaulted every day and it is the task of concerned African scholars
to defend the rights of organized and unorganized Zimbabwean workers
alike.
Unfortunately
for Mamdani this article defending Mugabe came out at a time when
there was news of the health emergency and the more than 1,000 who
have died from cholera. Already, spokespersons for the Mugabe dictatorship
have begun to use the writing of Mahmood Mamdani to give legitimacy
to their anti-imperialist rhetoric. Mahmood Mamdani opposed the
expulsion of the Asians from Uganda. This author opposed the expulsion
of the Asians from Uganda on the grounds that it was racist. Mahmood
Mamdani has recognised that after the removal of Idi Amin the top
Asian capitalists returned to Uganda. In order to ensure that imperialism
and the white settlers are not the beneficiaries of the quagmire
and nightmare in Zimbabwe, there is a need to explore new agricultural
techniques rooted in the experiences of farm workers to develop
cooperatives as a means of breaking the domination of the new black
capitalists. It was the democratic right of the Zimbabwean people
to reclaim the lands seized by British colonialists, but progressive
scholars must oppose all forms of exploitation, whether black or
white.
At this time,
this author supports the Zimbabwean farm labourers and opposes both
the settler capitalist classes in Zimbabwe and their African allies
seeking to continue the exploitation of the country-s workers,
poor peasants and traders.
Western imperialism
understands the delicacy of the balance of forces in Zimbabwe. It
is for this reason that the West is pressuring neoliberal elements
in the MDC to join a government of national unity with the same
group that has killed over 20,000 Zimbabweans and expelled over
750,000 urban dwellers from their places of shelter. The recent
scholarship on Zimbabwe offers one avenue for those who want to
interrogate the links between ZANU-PF and the immense suffering
of the country-s (as reflected in the Special Bulletin of
the Association of Concerned African Scholars). Mamdani is correct
to draw attention to the influence of neoliberal forces such as
Eddie Cross within the MDC, but neoliberalism is dead and the governments
of western Europe and the USA are busy nationalising banks without
democratic control and accountability. Zimbabweans who want transformation
must oppose the neoliberal forces within the MDC to ensure that
the suffering of working people does not continue after the ultimate
departure of Robert Mugabe.
There is nothing
democratic or revolutionary about what is going on in Zimbabwe under
Robert Mugabe and ZANU-PF. African scholars and progressive forces
must use all of their resources to support producers as they seek
new forms of emancipatory politics in the face of the global capitalist
crisis. Africans, like decent humans in all parts of the planet,
want to live in dignity and with basic rights.
* Horace
Campbell is a member of the African Studies Association and the
National Conference of Black Political Scientists.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|