|
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
Talks, dialogue, negotiations and GNU - Post June 2008 "elections" - Index of articles
Heads of state don't own nations
Geoffrey
Nyarota, The Zimbabwe Times
October 14, 2008
http://www.thezimbabwetimes.com/?p=5873
I believe I speak on
behalf of the majority of Zimbabweans when I express the hope that
Thabo Mbeki returned to Harare this time around driven by a singular
determination not to depart again without achieving the success
we yearn and pray for.
The current round of
negotiations that have bedevilled Zimbabwe under his stewardship
over the past many months will not yield the desired result, however,
unless certain pertinent facts that may be unpalatable to some of
the contesting parties are taken into serious consideration.
That the negotiations
have already lasted so long is an indictment on the negotiating
skills of both Mbeki and the Zimbabwean political leaders. But they
cannot allow the negotiating process to proceed beyond this round
without finding a solution; otherwise the whole initiative must
be abandoned as a total failure and a waste of precious time.
The political parties
partaking in the negotiations should be mindful that they are negotiating,
not for personal benefit, or in a quest for power and glory. They
were elected by the electorate in March and June, however questionable
the process and they represent the people. The welfare and the future
well-being of the citizens of Zimbabwe must be held paramount in
their deliberations. Their major pre-occupation should be to seek
to redress the economic, political and human rights crises that
have ruined Zimbabwe.
For an inordinately long
period of time, the people of Zimbabwe have endured pain, deprivation
and humiliation, while remaining silent and patient, even in the
face of open provocation.
In those circumstances
it cannot be too much to ask the politicians to tamper their expectations
in accordance with the reality of the situation they have created
with little regard for the welfare of the people.
Zanu-PF, or the MDC for
that matter, cannot demand to take charge of certain ministries
merely to satisfy the expectations or the aspirations of individual
politicians. That cannot continue to be a guiding principle. In
the case of Zanu-PF, Mugabe is on record as saying that his last
cabinet was the worst he has ever presided over, in terms of the
performance of individual ministers.
This is a sentiment fully
endorsed by the majority of Zimbabweans, a rare achievement for
Mugabe of late; to have any of his pronouncements receive the approval
of even those of his compatriots that he has systematically alienated
over the years. It is for that reason that the people denied so
many of the ministers in question their vote in March. It was because
he was the leader of an under-performing team and because of his
own lackluster performance that they gave more votes to Morgan Tsvangirai,
even though it took the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission a total of
five weeks to count the ballots.
In those circumstances
it is amazing that Zanu-PF should demand, as Mugabe did on Friday,
the very ministries in which he openly admits they have performed
dismally. I refer here to the crucial ministries of Finance, Foreign
Affairs, Defence, Home Affairs, Justice, Information and others,
which he arbitrarily apportioned
to his party on the list which he had the audacity to gazette on
Friday night.
Strangely Zanu-PF says
precious little by way of justifying the allocation of these ministries
to themselves.
Let-s take the
controversial Ministries of Home Affairs, for instance. Under a
succession of ministers, some of clearly dubious credentials, there
has been an outright breakdown in law and order in Zimbabwe. The
Zimbabwe Republican Police has been reduced to a politically partisan
institution. The police force has become highly politicised under
a Commissioner General who openly declares his own allegiance to
President Mugabe. Generally, there has been a shocking deterioration
in the standards of policing. The voters- roll is now a total
shambles. To be issued with a passport has become an expensive luxury.
In the face of such crass
incompetence on what basis does Zanu-PF demand to retain the Ministry
of Home Affairs?
The Ministry
of Finance has been the worst performer. A succession of ministers
has presided over the collapse of our economy. Matters of economic
policy have been relegated to the Governor of the Reserve Bank.
Gideon Gono-s simple answer to Zimbabwe-s dire economic
situation has been to print worthless bank notes with reckless abandon.
Ironically, while President
Mugabe shamelessly hurls endless abuse at President George Bush,
the American dollar has become the official currency of Zimbabwe.
In the area of Foreign
Affairs the government - Mugabe himself in particular - has reduced
Zimbabwe to the status of an internationally isolated nation, a
pariah state, shunned by most of the international community. Those
African nations the government would have us believe support Zimbabwe
do so only out of some form of pan-African nepotism. Even then,
none of them ever makes unequivocal public pronouncements in support
of Zimbabwe or Mugabe.
They merely suffer his
presence in silence when they meet at international fora. Those
African leaders who publicly voice their opinion are critical of
Mugabe - Raila Odinga of Kenya, the late Levy Mwanawasa of Zambia
and Ian Seretse Khama of Botswana. They did not collectively endorse
the election which Mugabe claims he won by a landslide. Mugabe arbitrarily
pulled us out of the Commonwealth. He did not seek our mandate.
He treats our country as his fiefdom.
The belligerence that
characterizes Mugabe-s relationship with certain foreign leaders
is totally without the consent of the people of Zimbabwe. I have
listened to Zimbabwean diplomats as they speak of the utter embarrassment
of representing a country whose leader does not respect diplomatic
etiquette, a leader whose approach to international relations is
totally devoid of the decorum expected and required of a statesman.
But, so they say, they
have to support their families.
Mugabe accuses the media
both national and foreign of painting a negative picture of our
Zimbabwe. He is the worst culprit in this regard. It should be a
condition of the agreement that he desists from such behaviour.
The Ministry of Information has totally ruined Zimbabwe-s
media sector. Herald House, an imposing building in its heyday was
built on revenue from newspaper sales and advertising. Today The
Zimbabwe Times publishes a story about Zimbabwe Newspapers (1980)
Ltd, a once magnificent company, which now fails to pay its journalists
and other staff.
Jonathan Moyo and George
Charamba must hang their heads in shame.
What strategies does
Zanu-PF have for the recovery of the media sector? Instead of just
making demands they must explain.
The suggestion here is
not that Zanu-PF surrenders everything to the MDC. After all, the
MDC did not secure a resounding victory. That is debatable, however,
given the inordinate delay in the announcement of poll results.
In the case of the presidential election the result was not announced
for a total of five weeks. This is totally unheard of the world
over, but then the people of Zimbabwe are so civil, so humble, so
patient and so law-abiding.
Mugabe and Zanu-PF should
recognise and respect these amazing qualities.
So should Mbeki.
Above all, both Zanu-PF
and MDC cannot simply demand to be allocated certain ministries
without justifying those demands by explaining to the satisfaction
of the people they seek to serve what exactly they propose to change
or to achieve in those portfolios for the benefit of the nation.
Mbeki must not preside
over the signing of another half-baked agreement. The future of
Zimbabwe over the next five years is at stake. He must hold a private
meeting with Mugabe where he should impress upon him the fact that
presidents don-t own countries, while citing his own recent
experience.
Finally, Mugabe must
realise that it is either an admission of failure or a display of
total lack of ambition and enterprise for him to seek to remain
on the same job in the same office for a total of 33 years.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|