|
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
Talks, dialogue, negotiations and GNU - Post June 2008 "elections" - Index of articles
Mugabe's intentions are now quite clear
Tendai Dumbutshena,
Zimbabwe Times
October 01, 2008
http://www.thezimbabwetimes.com/?p=5097
Nelson Mandela was reluctant
to publicly criticise Thabo Mbeki, his successor as president of
South Africa. He therefore did not join the chorus of condemnation
of Mbeki's handling of the Zimbabwe crisis.
He, however, felt compelled
to break the silence on Zimbabwe following the inordinate delay
in announcing the results of the March 29 presidential poll and
the orgy of violence unleashed by the state. He attributed the mess
in Zimbabwe to a catastrophic failure of leadership.
Painfully evidence
of that is plain to see. Six months have passed since the March
29 elections and the country has effectively no government. The
country is bleeding to death while Robert Mugabe fiddles. With the
presidency firmly in his pocket he seems to be in no hurry to implement
the power-sharing agreement
signed on 15 September. This is a clear contrast to the speed at
which things were done, following the forced resignation of Mbeki
in South Africa. Within three days a new president had been elected
who swiftly moved to constitute and swear in a cabinet. This is
in a country that is fully functional.
Such urgency
is conspicuous by its absence in Zimbabwe. Soon after the signing
of the agreement Mugabe flew to New York with a large entourage
to deliver another inconsequential tirade against the West. No progress
could be made on outstanding issues while he was away for a full
week. With the situation on Zimbabwe rapidly deteriorating by the
day there was no one to attend to pressing matters. The economy,
now driven by black marketers, criminals and corrupt officials,
continued on a steep downward trajectory. On his return a welcome
rally at the airport was organized as if he was a conquering hero.
What is the point? The mindlessness of it all is utterly depressing.
Mugabe said a cabinet
would be announced by the end of the week. This gave the impression
that the issue of the sharing of the key portfolios had been resolved.
The world was subsequently
informed that a meeting between MDC leader Morgan Tsvangirai and
Mugabe on the issue was deadlocked. Mugabe's intentions are now
quite clear. If the agreement is to be implemented it must be on
his own terms. The MDC made all the important concessions to make
the agreement possible. Mugabe said a government would be formed
within a few days on the expectation that yet again the MDC would
yield to his demands for Zanu-PF to get all the portfolios it deems
important in its calculations. If the MDC does not participate on
this issue Mugabe is quite prepared to let the deal collapse.
The MDC has brought this
on itself. It was folly of the highest order to shift from their
critical principled position of a transitional inclusive government.
Once they made that crucial blunder they were on a slippery slope
to surrender. The party's spokesman Nelson Chamisa said Zanu-PF
should not labour under the illusion that they are desperate to
be in government. But that is the impression they created as they
ceded ground to Zanu-PF on all major issues. The end-result was
an agreement that merely legitimized Mugabe as president leaving
his powers virtually intact. Now Mugabe, resentful of their presence
in government, even as junior partners, wants to humiliate them.
He is conducting negotiations on the cabinet posts on a take it
or leave it basis hoping with some justification that the pattern
of capitulation by the MDC will persist.
At the airport
he made it clear that nothing would change, fully mindful of the
consequences of his sterile rhetoric. Nothing has changed. For Mugabe
it is "me first, Zanu-PF second and Zimbabwe last and least."
The MDC is now appealing to the AU and SADC to intervene as guarantors
of the agreement. These bodies have stated that Mbeki should remain
mediator, notwithstanding his loss of power in South Africa. Mugabe
knows that with his presidency secured he has nothing to fear from
Africa. It is a done deal. Mbeki neither had the inclination nor
courage to apply meaningful pressure on Mugabe when he was leader
of the most powerful country in the region. What can he do now that
he is stripped of all power? It is not even clear that he still
wants to be mediator after the trauma and humiliation he suffered.
As previously stated
in this column as far as Africa goes the MDC now has nowhere to
run to. Guarantees given to the agreement by the AU and SADC are
worthless. Both bodies recognized Mugabe's presidency soon after
the June 27 putsch. The MDC got itself into this mess and must sort
itself out of it. It is not difficult to imagine what will happen
should the so-called power-sharing government be formed. Frozen
out of power Tsvangirai and his Council of Ministers will be mere
spectators as Mugabe continues to rule with a coterie of securocrats
and CIO functionaries.
All he needs Parliament
for is to pass the budget which no party can afford to oppose. Tsvangirai
will be in charge of nothing. Mugabe refuses to budge on the position
of head of government because that would have given Tsvangirai real
power over cabinet. As things stand the MDC will have imaginary
supervisory and policy formulation powers. The fact that Mugabe
refuses to give the MDC ministries he considers important reveals
what role he envisages for them in the new government.
The end result will be
a government that will have no credibility in the eyes of that section
of the international community whose financial support is essential
for Zimbabwe's economic prospects. Unable to improve the economy
the government will lose credibility among the people of Zimbabwe.
This will be no skin off Mugabe's nose. He will be firmly in the
presidential saddle with his power underpinned by the generals and
fatalistically accepted by a frightened population. As for Tsvangirai
he will learn the hard way that in politics you cannot afford to
let your judgement desert you at critical junctures. Good intentions
alone are simply not enough.
Years back the
British international publication The Economist published an edition
with the cover title "Africa: The Hopeless Continent."
An editorial comment in that issue concluded: "Africa is ill-served
by its leaders." Tragically this is being borne out in Zimbabwe.
Mugabe's callous selfishness and Tsvangirai's naiveté combine
to deny the people of Zimbabwe the leadership they so desperately
need. It is a catastrophic failure of leadership.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|