| |
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
Talks, dialogue, negotiations and GNU - Post June 2008 "elections" - Index of articles
Zimbabwe faces a monumental challenge
David Blair,
The Telegraph
September 16, 2008
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2008/09/16/do1604.xml
Can any good come of co-operating with Robert Mugabe? The contrasting
performances of the old autocrat and his new Prime Minister, Morgan
Tsvangirai, during yesterday's signing ceremony in Zimbabwe showed
the immense risks attached to their power-sharing agreement.
Mr Mugabe, bitter and vengeful as ever, delivered the same rambling
speech he has inflicted on audiences for the past 10 years. Meanwhile,
Mr Tsvangirai was magnanimous, optimistic and even noble in his
willingness to let bygones be bygones.
This agreement needs sober and realistic scrutiny, for David Miliband
and Gordon Brown now face a dilemma. Britain will soon be asked
to recognize the new government and help fund the recovery of Zimbabwe's
shattered economy and society.
Handing over any money while Mr Mugabe stays on as president would
be deeply unpalatable. If the settlement fails, any funding could
serve only to tighten his grip on power. But if support is withheld,
Zimbabwe's suffering will persist.
How should Britain judge the Mugabe-Tsvangirai agreement? The fundamental
problem is that the whole notion of "power-sharing" is
inherently flawed.
In reality, authority will not be equally apportioned between two
politicians of goodwill. Either Mr Mugabe will remain the most powerful
man in Zimbabwe - or Mr Tsvangirai will supplant him.
Both outcomes are possible. Under the agreement, Mr Mugabe will
keep his grip on vital levers of power, notably the army, whose
generals effectively took over the government during this year's
violent elections, and the Reserve Bank, which prints the money.
Meanwhile, Mr Tsvangirai will have a majority in both the cabinet
and parliament, assuming he can forge an alliance with the rival
wing of the Movement for Democratic Change led by Arthur Mutambara.
Again, this is possible, but by no means certain.
The only certainty is that a titanic struggle between Mr Mugabe
and Mr Tsvangirai will now begin. The prime minister's erstwhile
majority in cabinet and parliament will be pitted against the old
autocrat's control of the armed forces and of the government's purse
strings.
Britain must not rush into any decision. The only way to judge this
agreement is by concrete results. To win international confidence
and establish himself as the new government's leading force, Mr
Tsvangirai should swiftly accomplish four specific tasks.
First, he must
ensure that aid agencies have unrestricted access to the millions
of Zimbabweans who desperately need emergency food supplies.
With callous indifference to human suffering, Mr Mugabe formally
banned
them from helping people during the election campaign and his brutal
militias closed vast areas of the country to outsiders. While this
ban has been lifted, relief workers still endure harassment and
obstruction. All this must stop.
Second, Mr Tsvangirai could take a first, vital step towards reviving
the economy by sacking Gideon Gono, the discredited crony of Mr
Mugabe who presides over the Reserve Bank and bears key responsibility
for the country's meltdown. The new prime minister should send the
contemptible Mr Gono packing.
Third, Mr Tsvangirai should execute another sacking: Augustine Chihuri,
the thuggish police commissioner, must be sent on his way. Mr Chihuri
has publicly proclaimed his loyalty to Mr Mugabe's Zanu-PF party
and wrecked the credibility of his force by turning a blind eye
to the violence of the election campaign.
Under yesterday's agreement, an MDC figure is expected to become
home affairs minister with direct control of the police. Whoever
takes the job should dispatch Mr Chihuri on his first day in office.
Finally, Mr Tsvangirai should tear up the repressive laws that Mr
Mugabe passed to save his own skin. The Public
Order and Security Act requires police permission for any political
gathering and makes criticism of the president a criminal offence.
Another law, the Access
to Information and Protection of Privacy Act, was used to shut
down Zimbabwe's only independent daily newspaper and stop foreign
journalists entering the country.
These laws mean that Zimbabweans live under a permanent state of
emergency. Both must be repealed. As the MDC holds a majority in
parliament, this vital action could, in theory, be accomplished
very quickly. Simply by taking this step, the atmosphere in Zimbabwe
would be transformed.
If Mr Tsvangirai achieves all of the above, he will swiftly establish
his authority and prove that his government is worth supporting.
Britain should then offer diplomatic recognition and financial aid.
The great risk is that the new government collapses into paralysis
and infighting. Deadlock between Mr Mugabe and Mr Tsvangirai could
prevent anything useful from being done - and Zimbabwe's headlong
decline will continue. If so, Britain should resist the temptation
to offer any support. There will be no point investing in a rudderless,
failing administration, in which Mr Mugabe retains the power of
veto.
For all his many faults, Mr Tsvangirai is a man of compassion and
goodwill. By assuming the premiership, he has shouldered a monumental
task. If he takes the four steps detailed above, he will prove that
he is up to the challenge. Over to you, Mr Tsvangirai.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|