|
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
2008 harmonised elections - Index of articles
Post-election violence 2008 - Index of articles & images
MDC pull out from presidential run-off election - Index of articles
Fresh
dilemmas over Zimbabwe
Peter Greste, BBC News
June 22, 2008
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7468399.stm
When Morgan Tsvangirai
first decided to contest the run-off election several months ago,
he made a calculated gamble.
Morgan Tsvangirai
has been forced to admit the failure of his strategy He judged that
his support across the country was so great that as long as there
was a high enough turnout, they could swamp any attempt by the ruling
party, Zanu-PF, to rig the poll. He also bet that the region's election
watchdogs and diplomatic pressure would keep Zanu relatively honest,
and make sure it ran what would, at least superficially, be a reasonably
balanced election. With less than a week to go before the poll,
Morgan Tsvangirai has admitted that he was wrong.
In his statement,
the leader of the Movement for Democratic Change cited seven reasons
for choosing to bow out:
State sponsored violence: According to the MDC,
international human rights groups and, increasingly, regional election
monitors, Zanu-PF party thugs have waged a campaign of intimidation
and violence. They have not only used party supporters, but state
security institutions like the police and the military.
Inability
to campaign: A Western diplomat described Morgan Tsvangirai
as a "prisoner of Harare". The city is ringed by official
and unofficial roadblocks which effectively stopped the MDC's leader
from reaching his supporters. Police had detained him at least five
times, MDC rallies had been banned and in a final blow, armed members
of the Zanu-PF youth brigade occupied a stadium in Harare where
the party had hoped to hold a major rally.
Decimation
of MDC structures: The party said more than 80 of its members
had been murdered over recent months. Hundreds more were in hiding,
making it impossible for the party to organise.
No confidence
in the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission: In its statement,
the party said it was shocked by the ZEC's level of partisanship,
and accused the commission of being staffed by Zanu-PF militia.
No access
to the media: Independent media have been attacked or banned
from reporting in Zimbabwe. State media either ignores the MDC,
or portrays its members as violent stooges of the west. It has refused
to carry MDC campaign ads. Defiance by Mugabe: In recent speeches,
President Mugabe has repeatedly said he would refuse to give up
the gains of the liberation war because of an 'x' on a ballot paper.
He also said "only God can remove me".
Planned election rigging: The MDC listed what
it described as an elaborate and decisive plan by Zanu to rig the
elections. In a news conference to announce his decision, Morgan
Tsvangirai said: "We can't ask the people to cast their vote.
when that vote will cost their lives." "This violent retributive
agenda has seen over 200,000 people internally displaced and over
86 MDC supporters killed. Over 20,000 homes have been destroyed
and over 10,000 people have been injured and maimed in this orgy
of violence." Given such an exhaustive catalogue, it is hardly
surprising that Morgan Tsvangirai saw no point in continuing with
the campaign.
The MDC says
Zimbabwean police and military have led the intimidation But he
has also made it harder for the region to offer the kind of diplomatic
support that the MDC had hoped to win sooner. According to Zimbabwe's
Information Minister Sikhanyiso Ndlovu, the election will still
go ahead. He said it was now too late to stop the process, and the
Zimbabwean people should not be denied the right to vote. So, it
now seems inevitable that President Mugabe will be duly declared
the victor and inaugurated in line with Zimbabwe's constitution.
The process will effectively confer legal and constitutional legitimacy
on President Mugabe. That gives him a powerful argument for regional
and international recognition of his administration.
Resolve
stiffening
If the
MDC had gone through with the poll, election observers had already
indicated they were unlikely to declare it free and fair. With an
unequivocally negative verdict, regional governments would have
had grounds for withholding that recognition, and forcing President
Mugabe to negotiate not as a president, but as the leader of the
minority party. (In the parliamentary election held at the same
time as the first round of the presidential vote, Zanu-PF won 97
seats, to the MDC's 110.) However, there are already signs that
the region may refuse to accept a Mugabe presidency. Levy Mwanawasa,
the Zambian president and current chairman of the Southern African
Development Community (SADC), told a news conference that it was
"scandalous for SADC to remain silent on Zimbabwe". "It
will be bad if the majority of [SADC] leaders don't agree with me,"
he said. "What is happening in Zimbabwe is embarrassing to
all of us." He went on to argue that the elections should be
postponed until further notice. "I urge the authorities in
Zimbabwe to implement this postponement to allow for the establishment
of conditions that are suitable for the holding of genuinely free
and fair elections, in accordance with Zimbabwean laws."
Few
levers
There are signs that SADC - the one organisation that Robert Mugabe
still seems to respond to - will indeed agree with President Mwanawasa.
Even before Sunday's announcement, other regional leaders including,
significantly, President Jose Eduardo dos Santos of Angola, also
called on President Mugabe to "stop the violence and intimidation".
It remains to
be seen whether Mr Mwanawasa can galvanize SADC. President dos Santos
is one of the Zimbabwean leader's staunchest allies, and such a
public rebuke is likely to sting. But apart from withholding recognition,
it is hard to see what levers the region, or any foreign powers,
can pull. Sanctions would only hurt the poor, who are already suffering
under the weight of the economic crisis - and anyway they offer
only long-term pressure. Direct military intervention is not a realistic
prospect, and nor is a blockade. So, it comes back to negotiations.
The government has shown no serious appetite for compromise, and
the MDC has agreed to talks more because it needs to appear willing
to compromise, than because it really wants to join hands with Zanu-PF.
But the most powerful incentive for talks is the economic crisis.
Even the most hardened Zanu minister would recognize that the country
cannot continue on its current path, and that the only way out of
inflation reckoned to be around 2,000,000% is some kind of political
compromise. But that still looks a long way off.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|