|
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
2008 harmonised elections - Index of articles
Post-election violence 2008 - Index of articles & images
Zimbabwe
braced for its traumatic endgame
Richard Dowden, The Times, London
June 09, 2008
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article4092397.ece
Will Mugabe force victory
in the June run-off — or will there be a liberating turn of
events? Here are five possible outcomes.
The next three weeks
in Zimbabwe will be the most traumatic in its history. Robert Mugabe
has declared war on the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC), NGOs
and churches to reverse the electoral defeat he suffered in March.
It is a war on unarmed people. Can he win it and what would victory
mean?
Scenario
one: When the votes are counted after a peaceful, well-organized
and credible election on June 27, President Mugabe concedes defeat,
congratulates Morgan Tsvangirai, hands over the reins of power and
retires. Likelihood? Zero.
The official results
of the election on March 29 did not give Mr Tsvangirai more than
half the votes so there must be a run-off. To secure victory, Emerson
Mnangagwa, one of the architects of the massacres in Matabeland
in 1983, with the heads of the police, defense forces and Gideon
Gono, the Finance Minister, has launched a violent nationwide campaign
to destroy the opposition's capacity to deliver the vote.
Only the towns that the
ruling party now believe they cannot win have been spared. Key MDC
organizers have been abducted and killed. The death toll is about
50 so far but may be many more. Anyone suspected of voting MDC is
seized and ritually beaten, often on the back, buttocks and legs
with whips and sticks, sometimes wrapped in barbed wire.
Another strategy
is to force people out of their homes by burning their houses. Driven
from their constituency areas, they will be disqualified from voting.
MDC leaders are detained. NGOs are ordered
to stop work in rural areas so that news of what is happening
there cannot reach the outside world. It also means that hundreds
of thousands of people, now dependent on food aid, will not be fed.
The last strategy is to prepare a massive rigging campaign. Professionals
such as teachers, who acted as election officers in the first round,
are being intimidated so that Zanu (PF) officials can step in to
run the polling.
Opinions vary on whether
all this will succeed in cowing the people or if it will make Zimbabweans
more determined to cast their votes for the MDC. But even if Mr
Tsvangirai were to win the most votes, it is inconceivable that,
in its present mood, the regime would concede defeat.
Mr Mugabe believes
he won Zimbabwe by conquest, through the liberation war. Zimbabwe
was never a one-party state, but to him the function of elections
is to confirm his possession. The idea that he could be deposed
through the ballot box is unthinkable. His wife has vowed
publicly that Morgan Tsvangirai, the MDC leader, will never
see the inside of State House. To justify his claim - and his war
- Mr Mugabe has created a fantasy enemy: Britain. He says the British
want to recolonise Zimbabwe, bring back the white farmers and re-create
Rhodesia again. MDC is their creation and puppet.
While the key player
outside Zimbabwe, President Thabo Mbeki of South Africa, remains
silent on these developments, his probable successor, Jacob Zuma,
says they have undermined any possibility of a credible election.
He recommends a government of national unity.
Scenario
two: a power sharing agreement between both parties. Likelihood?
Minus zero. Neither side wants this election but the possibility
of a Kenya-style government of national unity is unthinkable.
Kenya had a lot to lose
from political disruption. Zimbabwe has lost it all already. About
ten powerful allies of Mugabe do have a lot to lose, which is why
they hold on to power at any cost. They could offer the MDC a few
places in government, but the MDC would not accept them. The only
terms under which MDC would enter a reconciliation government -
as they prefer to call it - is if they headed it.
Third
scenario: a victory for Robert Mugabe. Likelihood? High.
The party was complacent in the first round. It assumed the rural
areas would vote Zanu (PF) but they didn't. This time voters in
traditionally loyal areas will be urged, even forced, to the polling
stations. That, the campaign against the MDC and rigging might well
reverse the result.
This scenario raises
three more fundamental issues: the splits in Zanu (PF), the reaction
of the region and the economy. Everyone knows a Mugabe victory will
not reverse Zimbabwe's catastrophic disintegration - although there
are some who say he is willing to step down but will not be driven
from office.
After the declaration
of war on MDC, there is no one in the senior hierarchy of Zanu (PF)
who would be an acceptable replacement except as a stopgap. The
party itself is deeply riven by factions.
If Mr Mugabe wins, the
reaction of the regional leaders would be crucial. But since Mr
Mbeki's quiet diplomacy has failed, he appears to have no other
policy. The other presidents of Southern Africa are divided. They
will not condemn Mr Mugabe but would probably not continue to support
him if he wins an election under current circumstances.
The economy
can no longer provide the Government with the revenues it needs
to keep it in power. No one will lend it money. Every source of
wealth has been raided and drained. Inflation is now more than 2
million per cent. African economies do not die, they sink into subsistence,
but the Government's ability to pay soldiers, policemen, party officials
and civil servants is at an end. The election itself will drain
the last few drops of wealth from the coffers.
These factors create
fourth and fifth scenarios.
Scenario
four: The unpaid Armed Forces and police could break up
into pro and anti-Mugabe factions within the party. Some may support
the MDC. As the Armed Forces disintegrate, warlords take over local
areas. Zimbabwe begins to look more like Somalia. Likelihood? Possible.
Scenario
five: The miracle. Some random factor not in the equation
at the moment suddenly turns history. Maybe the death or defection
of a key Mugabe ally: Mr Gono, the Finance Minister, for example,
who has been churning out increasingly worthless banknotes. Now
he is of no further use, but, rich and ambitious, he may not see
a future with Mr Mugabe. His defection breaches the wall of the
fantasy castle and reality crashes in. Mr Mugabe and his chief lieutenants
seek refuge in Equatorial Guinea and a government of national unity
is set up.
Likelihood? Impossible
to say. But Southern Africa has been known to produce miracles before.
*Richard
Dowden is director of the Royal African Society. His book Africa:
Altered States, Ordinary Miracles is published in September.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|