|
Back to Index
Why
victims of oppression turned into vicious killers
Peter Kagwanja, The Nation (Nairobi)
June 01, 2008
http://allafrica.com/stories/200806020374.html
The attacks,
displacement and killings of poor African refugees and migrants
in South Africa by black xenophobic mobs has drawn attention to
the insecurity of foreigners in South Africa and the risk to the
country's stability.
What has happened is
not just attacks on African immigrants, but a tragic tale of how
victims of more than three centuries of colonialism, apartheid and
post-colonial underdevelopment became xenophobic killers.
In its aftermath, the
wave of xenophobic terror is a drawback to African unity, especially
the role of South Africa as a peacemaker and President Thabo Mbeki's
legacy of 'African Renaissance'.
The orgy of attacks started
in Alexandra Township in Johannesburg on May 11, spreading to the
outskirts of Pretoria, Durban, Cape Town and Eastern Cape.
By Africa Day on May
25, the violence had left 50 dead, nearly 30,000 displaced and 500
arrested.
The victims are from
as diverse African countries as Angola, Congo, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique,
Nigeria, Somalia, Zambia and Zimbabwe.
Worst
brutality
The
recent wave of xenophobia is the worst brutality South Africa has
witnessed since the high noon of apartheid violence that paved the
way for the historic transition from apartheid to democracy in 1994,
widely viewed as "one of the most extra-ordinary political
transformations of the 20th century".
This 'miracle' of transition
moved former United States Secretary of State, Warren Christopher,
to declare in 1996 that: "[there are] few countries with greater
potential to shape the 21st century than the new South Africa".
With its huge wealth,
political and military muscle, South Africa was expected to take
an active role in resolving Africa's festering conflicts.
Tragically, the photograph
of a hapless migrant up in flames and smouldering to death in Reiger
Park Township, Johannesburg, not only shocked the world, but has
increasingly eclipsed South Africa's 'miracle' and image as a stable
exporter of peace.
Successfully ending xenophobic
attacks and addressing its root causes to defuse further tensions
remain central to reducing the potential of instability within South
Africa, and ensuring its moral leadership in Africa and the world.
The recent xenophobic
terror on African migrants by black South Africans is ingrained
in apartheid's psyche.
Frantz Fanon, writing
about the psychological legacy of French rule on the colonised subjects,
lamented that the most oppressed internalises oppression and psychologically
yearns for a chance to oppress others.
In light of this, Mamphele
Ramphele warned in 2007 that "we should not underestimate the
psychological impact of three centuries of colonial rule followed
by apartheid."
One of the impacts of
apartheid is the trend by the victims of its oppression to view
the world, including themselves, through the eyes of their oppressor.
The results are dire:
socially induced inferiority complex, self-hatred, low self-esteem,
racial/ethnic hatred and jealousy, suppressed aggression and a form
of "nativism" or defence of identity and rights in ways
that seeks to exclude the 'other'.
Clearly, the violence
by black South Africans against fellow Africans is not a racial
or colour-line problem as all of them are black.
Indeed, the attacks proceeded
as if there are no non-black migrants in South Africa, even from
the neighbouring Zimbabwe, Mozambique and Angola.
The violence cannot also
pass as a purely "economic xenophobia" as some have characterised
it.
The violence is by poor
South Africans against their poor kith and kin from the continent.
Unlike violence aimed to dispossess the rich, this kind of violence
can hardly alter the plight of South Africa's poor in any fundamental
sense.
Sadly, the attacks are
reminiscent of the ill-famed "black-on-black" violence
in the closing years of apartheid South Africa in the 1980s and
early 1990s.
Nativism
Trying
to make sense of this violence, bureaucrats like Deputy Foreign
Minister, Aziz Pahad, see xenophobia as an assault on the "kindness,
compassion and spirit of Ubuntu" believed to form the fabric
of South Africa's society.
It has also reversed
the gains of "democratic revolution." This cultural rendition
of Black hatred of foreigners is important.
It reveals glaring similarities
in the underlying ideology and psyche between anti-African xenophobia
in South Africa and ethnic cleansing in Rwanda, Kenya and other
parts of Africa and Eastern Europe.
The attacks are driven
by the ideology of "nativism", which has fuelled hatred
of the racial or ethnic "other" and fostered exclusive
notions of citizenship across the world.
In many parts of Africa,
nativism has taken the form of "playing the communal card"
where rival elite camps exploit latent, and often legitimate, economic
grievances to instigate hatred and violence of rival groups for
political gains.
In the case of South
Africa, attacks on black migrants was perpetrated by marauding "ethnic"
youths wielding both modern and traditional weapons like axes, golf
sticks, clubs, metal bars, knobkerries and guns.
Superiority
Complex
One
of the most stubborn legacies of apartheid's social engineering
is a belief by black South Africans that they are superior to their
kith and kin North of River Limpopo.
In one of his weekly
letters, Mr Mbeki lamented that South Africa has not been able to
free itself from "the chains of bigotry".
Mob attackers who razed
down shops and shacks owned by poor African migrants chanted Hambani
makwerekwere ("foreigners, get out").
The pejorative term makwerekwere
also connotes the inferior other.
The construction of the
"inferior" African in the psyche of black South Africans
reflects the impact of the Bantu education which never taught black
South Africans about other parts of Africa.
It is very common to
hear a Black South African university researcher saying: "I
am going to Africa", meaning visiting an African capital.
Isolation of South Africans
from other Africans was part of apartheid's security architecture
and strategy.
It was reinforced by
physical separation and enforced through strict boundaries that
prevented one homeland from interacting with another.
More importantly, the
principle was upheld in regard to homelands and the rest of Africa.
Unfortunately, the isolation
of South Africa globally helped break the back of apartheid, but
also contributed to the identity gap between Blacks in South Africa
and those from other parts of the continent.
As such, black South
Africans were not ready for the encounters with their kith and kin
engendered by refugee and labour and other migrations after independence
in 1994.
Surveys by the Southern
African Migration Project in 1997 and 2006 showed that South Africa
was among the least tolerant nations toward migrants, with one-quarter
of South Africans voting for a ban on foreign migrants and about
22 per cent for their forcible return home.
This intense phobia for
the Amakwerekwere (African immigrants) fuelled violent clashes between
locals and migrants in Johannesburg in 1997.
It also explains why
apartheid-era migration policy and strategy was retained almost
intact after 1994.
Anti-migrant legistlations
include the notorious Aliens Control Act (amended in 1995 and 1996)
and the Immigration Act (2002), which the ANC state has enforced.
Not surprisingly, the
grand pan-African agenda that Mr Mbeki and other ANC "liberation
diplomats" mooted after their exile years in Africa has not
attracted support, but resistance at home.
Notably, the legacy of
ethnic superiority between South African blacks and others on the
continent also psychologically mutated into a superior-inferior
dichotomy in ethnic relations within and between South Africa's
multi-ethnic society.
While the galvanising
racial divide has tended to conceal this latent ethnic tension based
on the construction of the 'superior' or 'inferior' ethnic other,
the wave of xenophobia brought out some of its ugly aspects.
South Africa's ethnic
groups bordering "Africa" or who straddle the border with
Zimbabwe and Mozambique such as the Pedi, Venda, Tsonga and Shangaan
became fair game for xenophobic attackers.
The ANC's worst nightmare
is what the victory of the perpetrators of genocide would mean for
its own stability.
Gauteng is filled with
migrant labourers from the Eastern Cape (Xhosa) and KwaZulu-Natal
(Zulu), who might come under attack ala Kenya for "stealing"
the jobs of Gauteng locals.
Ethnicity featured in
attacks in Atteridgeville, a mostly Sotho-speaking area, with reports
of Nguni speakers being chased away.
But the real fear is
blacks xenophobes turning their wrath on non-blacks who now control
90 per cent of the economy and 87 per cent of the land.
Ethnic
jingoism
Despite
the pervasive ethnic jingoism, many black South Africans have, paradoxically,
readily acquiesced to an inferiority complex vis-a-vis the white
citizens, and by extension white migrants.
This largely explains
why despite an influx of white and Asian migrants into post-apartheid
South Africa, these have not been targets of xenophobia.
Another enduring legacy
of the apartheid era is a culture of grisly violence against mob
victims.
This was witnessed from
the image of the man on fire, and many more who smouldered to death
in their shacks, locked and set ablaze by attackers.
This horror goes back
to the brutality of apartheid violence, which sometimes involved
setting victims on fire, on occasion after "necklacing"
them with tires that pinned their arms to their sides.
This legacy of brutality
has turned townships into theatres of 'senseless and extremely dehumanising
violence", now facing African migrants.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|