THE NGO NETWORK ALLIANCE PROJECT - an online community for Zimbabwean activists  
 View archive by sector
 
 
    HOME THE PROJECT DIRECTORYJOINARCHIVESEARCH E:ACTIVISMBLOGSMSFREEDOM FONELINKS CONTACT US
 

 


Back to Index

A statement of hope
Clyde B. Chakupeta
May 01, 2008

The political impasse in Zimbabwe is nothing but a façade that has made us realize who Robert Mugabe is - a tyrant, a dictator, a humanist-impostor, a manipulator and a shrewd old man! He has shown us what it means to taste absolute power, power that has corrupted him absolutely. Even though he is a Catholic, he attacks the same church that he claims to belong to. He advises the church leaders in no uncertain terms not to venture into politics, unless they want to be politicians. He wants them to remain domiciled on the pulpit and preach soft messages of God-s goodness, and pay no heed to the suffering inflicted upon the people by his government. The church has made attempts to knock on the door of his conscience, yet he is defensive, pointing at such calls as neo-imperialistic drives. Very few religious leaders have employed the prophetic voice to challenge Mugabe, using the church instruments at their disposal. I intend to discuss this rather warped narrow view of church-state separation in politics and the role of the church.

The church-state 'formal separation- need not involve separation of faith and politics. If it did, as called for in Zimbabwe, "We were to banish the voice of the Church and of Christians from the public square and limit it only to private life and then indeed we would be guilty of the Marxist critique that religion is the opium of the people".1 We intend, as Christians to have a focus on a just society and polity. It is true that there has always been a dangerous tendency within Christian thought and praxis to over-emphasize the personal and the spiritual defined to exclude the social and the material, but to focus on the next life. The church was, during the ages of the monks, driven from the towns into the deserts, where the monks were supposed to spend their days weaving baskets while thinking of God and their nights unraveling what they had done and starting again. Now the church has the moral responsibility of being in the frontiers, where the need is greatest, not only in evangelical duties, but in all spheres of human existence.

Today the church is called to be contemplatives in action - to respond to the call for the option for the poor and the oppressed. Our case in Zimbabwe calls us to move from the nunneries, seminaries, presbyteries, bishoprics and enter to join the multitudes that are exposed to Mugabe gerrymandering. The daily bread of "Our Father- we pray for everyday and the love for our neighbour are central to the gospel message and we are urged to find political and social forums for expression of the common good which is an integral part of the agreed contemporary translations of the preaching of the Kingdom by Jesus.

Apparently, most of the religious leaders have adopted the Mbeki trivia, burying their heads in sand. Those who have the moral capacity to advice the ailing president have not used this privilege. Rather they have pretended to be building bridges, with no engineering survey done, involving no other stakeholders apart from themselves only. It is not surprising though to note that among the church leaders are some who benefitted from Mugabe-s illegal land resettlement programme, two of these are Catholic Church bishops Alexio Muchabaiwa and Patrick Mutume, both of Mutare. One does not need to be reminded of Bishop Norbert Kunonga, formerly of the Harare Diocese of the Anglican Church. We have pockets of high ranking clergy in their own religious sects who uphold Mugabe-s dictatorship, wearing blinkers because they are beneficiaries to his pettiness rule. Such are people who support Mugabe out of paternalism, rather than the desire for the common good.

This leads us to challenge the position of the church in Zimbabwe-s current impasse. The church has been very temperate, notwithstanding the published "God hears the Cry of the Oppressed" by the ZCBC (April 2007). The recent statement by the HODs, attempts to challenge Mugabe-s evil disposition. Apart from these, the church has been found turning a blind eye to the suffering of the nation. However, we have had other non-local religious leaders challenging the Zimbabwean impasse. Worthy mentioning is Dr. John Sentamu who said recently about Zimbabwe; "When a white man does [it], the whole world cries, a black person does it, there is a certain sense of, oh, and this is colonialism . . . . Africa and the entire world have to liberate Africa from this mental slavery and this colonial mentality - where there is anything you blame somebody else instead of yourself". This is the very tactic Mugabe is employing, the blame game. He blames the West, Bush and Brown, yet he fails introspection to check where he has gone wrong. Sentamu has gone to the extent of removing his dog collar until Mugabe goes; he has invited people to join him in action - fasting and praying for Zimbabwe. Very little action has been done by the church leaders in Zimbabwe. The South African Bishops Conference recently made a statement about the situation in Zimbabwe, yet the Zimbabwe Bishops- Conference is yet to. Who should lead the people to the interpretation of the Catholic Social teachings? To interpret and to live the social teachings of the Catholic Church is a mandate that the church leaders in no way can avoid.

The Catholic Social teaching emphasizes on notions of common good, subsidiary and solidarity as powerful resources in the search of the construction of a just society. What message do we preach to people on Sundays when there is no love between and among neighbors. Those belonging to a different political party become obvious enemies and deserve to be tortured, to have their properties destroyed and even to be killed. Come Sunday they sit side by side and we preach the love of neighbor. It is imperative that we evaluate and assess the response of our parishioners in this political and economic climate. Our dream is for a better Zimbabwe for all, more just Zimbabwe, economically and socially viable for the survival of all, not privatized for a few. And this is the teaching of Guadium et Spes, " . . . hope related to the end of time does not diminish the importance of intervening duties, but rather undergirds the acquittal of them with fresh incentives" (GS 21)2 . The poor and oppressed of our Zimbabwe deserves no less.

The same encyclical teaches that "earthly progress must be carefully distinguished from the growth of Christ-s Kingdom, to the extent that the former can contribute to the better ordering of human society, it is vital concern to the kingdom of God" (GS 39)3 .

The resurrection story should and must be the guiding principle for the church. The experiences of the cross seem to speak the manifestation of our Zimbabwe today. One is reminded of the righteous anger of Jesus when confronted with injustice. He had the temerity to call the Pharisees "brood of vipers." Very often it is the poor and suffering themselves who through God-s goodness are authors of the hope that we expect. By voting Mugabe out, we all hoped for a better Zimbabwe and are dedicated to the rebuilding of this once prosperous nation. This hope is faced with a tragic refusal by the noble savage, Mugabe. He pretends no vote took place and wants to extend his stay, yet this is open fraud, perpetrated by the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission.

This moment needs us more as church, as good Christians, to be "as gentle as doves and cunning as serpents" (Matt 10:16). We need to be advocators of justice and love, and even to protest angrily and prophetically about injustice. We need to go on doing this whenever there is injustice against any least of our brothers and sisters. This we need to do with the view of bringing about change, through engagement in social action guided by Jesus. The mission for us (Isaiah 6:14) is, "to preach the good news to the poor, give sight to the blind, to proclaim liberty to the oppressed" (Luke 4:18). This is the moment when we need baptized imagination and discernment for the common good. "Prayer should be central, but not to be used to dull the brain and to soften the edges of necessary conflict in ways that are helpful"4 . Above all, we need to keep in mind our friendship with the poor and oppressed, the anger coming from injustice they suffer which can be a catalyst for a communal and structural transformation.

Nonetheless, we lose perspective if our work together for justice is not permeated and nourished by its roots in faith. This is the time to strive for real independence of Zimbabwe. There is need for the rebuilding of Zimbabwe towards a new development for the common good. Pope Paul VI5 presents development as "the transition from less humane condition to those which are more human and indicates its characteristics - not merely economic and technological, but also the acquisition of culture, respect of dignity of others, acknowledgement of the highest good and recognition of God himself as author and end of these blessings. The church is therefore responsible to stand out and represent the rights of those whose dignity has been trampled upon by the government.

The Christian faith offers us a vision of life based on justice and forgiveness, leadership as service and not just power, trust in divine providence and in one another, a realistic appreciation of the power of evil and yet confident that it may be overcome, - all these are elements of the Good news. Prayer and liturgical celebration can open us up to liberating perspectives offered by the presence of God in our work with the poor and oppressed, and open us up to each other in new respect and acceptance of the Immanuel - God is with us.


Notes
  1. Gerard O-Hanlon Sj, Hope, Promotio Iustitiae, No. 97, 2007/4 pg 33
  2. Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church, Gaudium et Spes, Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World Second Vatican Council, (1965)
  3. Gaudium et Spes (1965)
  4. Gerard O-Hanlon Sj, Hope, Promotio Iustitiae, No. 97, 2007/4 pg 34
  5. Populorum Progressio, Pope Paul VI, 1967.

Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.

TOP