|
Back to Index
After
Mugabe - The media challenge
Anton Harber, Business Day
April 30, 2008
http://allafrica.com/stories/200804300036.html
A CHANGE of government
in Zimbabwe provides an opportunity to reshape its media along democratic
lines. Last time Zimbabwe went through major political change --
independence in 1980 -- the colonial media system was simply transferred
to the new state and continued to play a partisan role as the new
government became increasingly repressive.
Robert Mugabe's government
kept a stranglehold on broadcast media and took over the major newspapers
from the then Argus Group of SA. It built up a machinery of media
control, forcing the registration of journalists and publications
and using this -- and more direct repression -- to suppress opposition
voices.
Private newspapers were
given very little space in which to operate in the past decade or
so, and most were closed down. The country has had no independent
mass-market dailies for the past few years. This in a country with
a high literacy rate and strong demand for reading material. The
absence of a free media contributed significantly to the delay in
bringing democratic change.
That the opposition has
been able to win parliament in a situation where they have had almost
no media platform, and faced the naked hostility of powerful state
media, is a remarkable achievement. On the other hand, this led
to a lively media-in-exile, particularly on the internet. Newspapers,
radio stations and internet sites proliferated on foreign soil.
Much of the opposition communication has also been via SMS, another
new technology hard for the state to control. In the words of my
colleague, Tawana Kupe: "Zimbabweans have become masters of
alternative communication and media strategies as surrogates for
mainstream media."
Now there will be important
choices to make to rebuild and secure democracy. The first step
will be dismantling the legal and state machinery which controls
and contains the media. Most of it, such as the state-appointed
Media Council, and the security laws, can simply be done away with.
New institutions, such
as an independent broadcasting regulator, will need to be put in
place. Such moves should allow for a blossoming of private media.
A MISTAKE, however, would
be to privatise state-controlled media. The need for diversity will
not be served if such a large and dominant group is simply sold
off to a new owner, reproducing the imbalances inherited from the
colonial era.
The government could
break up the state media group, though they would have to be careful
to ensure the bits and pieces remain viable under what will be tough
economic conditions for some time at least. They could also try
and convert it to a true public service media, relinquishing control
over the trust and ensuring it falls into the hands of the great,
the good and the independent.
We know from the South
African experience that this can be difficult to achieve. It is
one thing to create the right policies and structures, but it is
another to immunise the structures from the interference of the
ruling party and other powerful political and economic interests.
This requires trustees and board members who are dedicated to protecting
and preserving the media's independence and prepared to stand up
to those who will inevitably try to compromise it.
Some of the world's greatest
newspapers are owned by trusts, such as the Guardian and the Economist,
and they have proven to be structures which can allow for quality
media that enjoys a greater independence than those in private or
listed companies.
I would hope that the
new Zimbabwean government goes for a basket of media reforms: opening
up the private media sector, privatising some state media, putting
the rest in a well insulated public service trust.
A new government should
also invest in a broadband network which will give widespread internet
access. That will not just empower people, but ensure that it will
be much harder for any authority to control information the same
way again.
*Harber is Caxton Professor
of Journalism, Wits University.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|