| |
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
2008 harmonised elections - Index of articles
An
exercise in patience
Sophie Shaw, The Guardian (UK)
April 21, 2008
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/apr/21/zimbabwe1?gusrc=rss&feed=networkfront
Four policemen
at a roadblock carrying assault rifles direct me. It's six miles
(10km) down a dirt road to the district administrator's office where
the recount is taking place. The road is bad - nobody in a government
Mercedes has been to this remote corner of Manicaland since the
last election. The office must have looked grand once, but it is
now grim. There are broken panes, piles of rat droppings and a strange
photo of President Robert Mugabe from two decades ago; a young-looking
65-year-old with a grimace for a smile. The compound is packed with
bored police, tense party activists and anxious presiding officers,
who may be joining colleagues in prison accused of corruptly inflating
the opposition vote three weeks ago. They are in for a hot wait
in the sun, perhaps for several days, sleeping where they can, before
they are summoned.
A platoon of
police and electoral commission officials is extracting sorry-looking
ballot boxes from a storeroom. At the end of a long night of counting
on March 29, presiding officers at 10,000 polling stations around
the country recorded their results, inventoried their boxes and
sealed them with padlocks and wax. Now one has a hole bashed in
the side; others are not securely fastened.
In a "boardroom" furnished with wobbly tables and broken
chairs, Priscilla is in charge of the recount. She carries her authority
well. She is from Harare and works for "a government agency,
not the electoral commission, but I'm acting for the electoral commission".
She welcomes foreign observers and I sit next to a large Angolan
from the Southern African Development Community team. He soon falls
asleep as the rising sun, the throng and activity push the temperature
above 30C. But before Priscilla can start, Lovemore, the new Movement
for Democratic Change (MDC) MP for this area, elected by a whiskery
majority of 20, objects to the recount. It is illegal and he demands
that it be stopped. He and Priscilla, who is determined to press
on, argue for an hour. Their exchange is tenacious and passionate,
but logical and respectful. They reach a typically Zimbabwean compromise.
Priscilla will proceed, but Lovemore will explain to the room what
is wrong.
He clears his throat
theatrically: "Respectfully madam, I want the electoral commission
to tell us here present who called for this recount - was it themselves
or the Zanu-PF? And I want to see the written application for a
recount. Was it submitted less than 48 hours after the original
vote? If not, this recount is illegal. I also want to know if the
original results recorded will be produced? And where have these
ballot boxes been kept? And who has had access to them? And if there
are any differences between the original results and what we see
today, I want you madam to hold an inquiry to find out why. Until
these questions are answered the MDC takes part in this recount
under protest."
While Priscilla happily
ignores these awkward questions and bustles around to get things
moving, Lovemore comes over to tell me more. He won his seat despite
intimidation of voters and attempts by the ruling Zanu-PF to monitor
individual votes. Now Zanu-PF is trying to overturn his victory.
It needs to snatch back a dozen marginal constituencies to regain
a parliamentary majority. Lovemore has heard that on April 9, 11
days after the election, a group of Zanu-PF officials, helped by
the electoral commission and the police, broke into the ballot boxes,
took out MDC votes and replaced them with forged papers marked for
Zanu-PF. Witnesses are ready to testify to this in court, but their
safety needs to be guaranteed.
Meanwhile, Priscilla
has the first ballot box open. There are problems - first a security
tag has the wrong serial number, then the number of votes does not
match the number of names ticked off the electoral roll. Priscilla
looks wrathfully at the presiding officer, but he manages to talk
his way out of trouble.
The counting
is paint-dryingly slow. The presiding officer holds each vote up
for scrutiny by party agents. There are protracted arguments about
individual papers - does a cross made with red ink mean that a ballot
is spoiled? And once the presidential votes have been counted, the
process is repeated for the senate, parliamentary and local council
elections. Then the presiding officer, who looks like he wants to
vomit up his fear, painstakingly goes through the electoral roll,
checking that the number of names ticked off equals the number of
votes cast. It's 1pm before the first box is finished. We've been
at it for five hours.
The results are announced. Lovemore is pleased that the votes match
what he noted down on election night. This first box, at least,
has not been tampered with. There's a change of mood in the room
as the presidential result is announced: Tsvangirai 164, Mugabe
106, Makoni 5. These figures have been suppressed for three weeks
and for many in the room it's the first partial confirmation of
rumours that the MDC leader Morgan Tsvangirai has won and may even
have scored the magic 50% that would give him the presidency immediately.
Lovemore is in reflective
mood as the day drags on. He is frustrated that Tsvangirai is out
of the country, but what else can the leader do? He might be killed
or arrested if he returns. Ordinary activists are being beaten and
burned out of their homes by Zanu-PF youth. Lovemore fears that
Mugabe plans to grind those who supported the opposition into submission
and then call for a run-off presidential vote. That would give the
MDC a desperate dilemma - whether to try to win a dirty fight or
to boycott and hand Mugabe a default victory. Even with such a feeble
mandate, Mugabe might try to soldier on for a few more years, at
least while he has the strong backing of his South African counterpart,
Thabo Mbeki.
The Zanu-PF candidate,
Charity, is a bright young woman who explains to me that Zanu-PF
is modernising and reaching out to the disenfranchised 52% of the
population. She has a point - the MDC is a notoriously chauvinistic
party. Lovemore shrugs his shoulders when I ask him why: "The
country has to eat before we can worry about advancing our women".
I don't get the feeling Lovemore spends much time worrying about
Zimbabwe's non-advanced women, but it is true that women suffer
the brunt of hunger and poverty resulting from the economic collapse.
At a snail's pace, I
watch five out of 39 boxes being recounted during the day. It's
going to take at least three days to finish the recount, maybe more.
But despite the flaws in this weary process, there's no sign yet
that anybody has stuffed any of the boxes. So why on earth are so
many hundreds of people spending so long on this pointless exercise?
Maybe the rigging will be done tomorrow or next week, when the observers
are so weary that they've stopped noticing what's happening. Maybe
this huge exercise is simply intended to buy time for a dying regime.
Zimbabweans love to "make a plan" to address their difficulties.
Maybe Mugabe's plan is to soften the country up for a bloody run-off.
Maybe his friends need time to get money out of the country. Or
maybe there is no plan and he's just clinging on because he knows
nothing other than power. After all, he was voted out of office
three weeks ago, so every day he hangs on to the presidency is a
victory.
*Sophie
Shaw is a pseudonym
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|