| |
Back to Index
White
wrath, white flight and economic decline
Nyankor Matthew, Running Africa
April 01, 2008
http://runningafrica.com/Commentary-04012008Zimbabwe-EconomicDecline.html
Neely Fuller, Jr. said,
"If you don't understand white supremacy--what it is, and how
it works -- everything else that you understand will only confuse
you."
Let me preface my article
by saying I am not excusing Mr. Mugabe and Zanu-PF for some of the
political and economic missteps during the past 28 years, however,
this is not about Mugabe and Zanu-PF. My goal is to put Mugabe in
context. Mugabe, a man who has been demonized by the whites and
the western media, must be put into context to gain a better understanding
of the current situation in Zimbabwe.
Last week while
reading The Economist magazine, I came across a very interesting
article titled, "Time for the rescue: How to help Zimbabwe,
if Robert Mugabe really gives up power at last" (The Economist,
March 22-28, 2008). According to the article, Zimbabwe's rescuers
would be: The West, Afrikan run but minority controlled South Africa
and Botswana, and the global white supremacy institutions IMF, and
the World Bank. What do all these rescuers have in common? They
are all controlled by Whites! And the IMF and World Bank are nothing
more than Global white supremacy institutions that use so called
foreign Aid to control the Afrikan people and Afrika's natural resources.
Of course whites want the IMF, World Bank, and white controlled
South Africa and Botswana to come and rescue Zimbabwe. This would
be a perfect set up for Zimbabwe's former colonial oppressors the
British and the minority whites of Zimbabwe to once again manipulate
the political system and control Zimbabwe's natural
resources, especially at a time when everyone is scrambling for
Afrika's natural resources.
Until Independence, Zimbabwe's
white minority had ruled Zimbabwe from 1923 to 1979. During this
time the minority whites controlled politics and the economy. Blacks
were not only disenfranchised, they were also brutally forced off
their ancestral lands, creating an inequitable distribution of land
that allowed the white minorities who made up less than 1% of the
population to own more than 80% of the land.
It is easy for
whites and their African agents to point the finger at Mr. Mugabe
as the sole cause of the current economic and political situation
in Zimbabwe. Since the end of white rule, led my Ian Smith, the
whites in Zimbabwe and their British and South African cousins have
not been able to bring Mr. Mugabe into submission. Let us not be
fooled into believing that Zimbabwe's so called "economic collapse"
is due solely to Mr. Mugabe and Zanu-PF mis-management of the economy,
although they do bear some of the responsibility. The root cause
of Zimbabwe's collapse is due largely to the anger of the former
ruling white minority elites who felt a sense of entitlement over
Zimbabwe's economy, politics, and resources; so how dare a black
man strip them of what they believe is rightfully theirs? How dare
a black man stripe them of land they believe is rightfully theirs,
despite the fact that blacks were murdered and forcefully taken
off these lands? Once the whites realized that they could not bring
Mr. Mugabe into submission politically, many of them fled to South
Africa, Botswana, and Britain, taking with them the country's wealth
and most of the country's professional classes, leaving behind institutions
blacks were inadequately prepared to manage due to their lack of
participation during white minority rule. Once Mugabe proved to
be a formidable opponent, the Zimbabwean whites, the British, the
EU, and to a lesser extent the U.S, began engaging in subversive
political and economic activities designed to undermine Mr. Mugabe
from every possible angle. Zimbabwe's former colonial oppressors
have been using every economic and political tactic to choke the
country and force Mr. Mugabe out of power.
By stripping whites of
their economic and political power over blacksand Zimbabwe's resources,
Mugabe sent a loud and clear message to the British and the West
that it had become independent, and was on a journey to remove the
vestiges of colonialism and white entitlement, and was establishing
itself as a sovereign black nation. The United States, Britain,
and the European Union have imposed what they call targeted sanctions
at President Robert Mugabe and his key supporters, and the country
as well. These involve travel bans, and restrictions on commercial
activities. Their goal is to make it so difficult economically on
the people of Zimbabwe that they will eventually cry for their European
saviors to come back in and steal the resources so they can live
a better life, even if it means not having national sovereignty.
Like their forefathers did, the Europeans and their mentally enslaved
Afrikan agents are trying their best to keep Zimbabwe in poverty
until the people will get fed up and be willing to get back on the
global plantation.
This game is bigger than
Mr. Mugabe. The game is about global control, and whites want everything
under their control. European nations are starving for natural resources,
and not as influential politically as they once were, so they are
now forced to compete with emerging economies for limited resources;
Because they are unable to directly exploit the mother Continent,
they have become very clever at finding other means, and any Afrikan
leader or country that stands in that way will be destroyed if not
militarily, economically, or politically. They want to control Afrika's
resources, and will gladly do everything they can, even using our
own mentally enslaved and mentally handicapped leaders and people
to ensure that the Mother Continent is kept in a perpetual state
of political and economic retardation.
Mugabe would not have
anywhere near as much external support as he does on the mother
Continent if the whites' primary concern isn't only about Zimbabwe's
white minority. Most of the victims of the current "economic
collapse" are actually black Zimbabweans, but what does that
matter when all one sees and hears is a chance to indulge in "white
man as victim" posturing, and totally disregard the role these
whites played in oppressing black Zimbabweans politically, economically,
and
socially?
nyankorm@gmail.com
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|