|
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
2008 harmonised elections - Index of articles
May
I be the first to congratulate Mugabe
Chido
Makunike, New Zimbabwe
January 28, 2008
http://www.zimbabwesituation.com/jan28_2008.html
Zimbabwe's presidential
and general elections are set for March 29, but one result is already
obvious: Robert Mugabe is going to be returned as president.
Two months before the
election, I might as well be the first to congratulate Mugabe on
his assured win.
In a way, it really is
a waste of time to hold the election at all because there are so
many signals that there is no way any other result than a "win"
for Mugabe can be contemplated. Whether or not Mugabe is still "popular"
is an interesting but largely irrelevant issue to the outcome of
this election.
This creates quite a
dilemma for MDC leader Morgan Tsvangirai. There are virtually no
circumstances under which he can win the election, even if many
more people vote for him than for Mugabe, so his participation would
largely be a charade. Yet if he pulls out, he will be accused of
being afraid of losing. He is in a no-win situation in a quite literal
way.
But so is Mugabe, the
impending "winner." The possibly ghastly consequences
for him of his being turned out of office at the ballot box are
obvious, and are just one reason that it will not happen. Yet his
"win" on March 29 will be hollow and meaningless in many
ways, particularly for the country, but for him as an individual
as well.
The country he rules
over may be in a shameful mess as he wrings his hands and looks
for ever more imaginative excuses for that state of affairs, but
Mugabe still has his pockets of sympathy and support. But it is
also true that a significant body of world opinion regards him as
such an oppressive ogre that they will automatically assume he stole
the election.
It may be only Zimbabweans
who vote in the election, but how Mugabe is negatively regarded
in influential sections of the world has been a significant factor
in his being a bombastically strong ruler, but who in practical
terms is helpless and ineffective; a long-serving lame duck president.
Whichever of Zimbabwe's many long-running problems you choose to
examine, there is no one who any longer believes Mugabe is going
to come up with some sensible, workable solution.
Those who support him
do not any longer do it for the reason that they believe the country's
fortunes will improve if he is given five more years to the 27 that
he has already served.
To many of those supporters,
Mugabe represents an anti-Western symbolism for which his uselessness
to Zimbabweans' material fortunes can be excused.
For them, the fact that
Zimbabwe is in such a poor state and has little prospect of reversing
that decline under a Mugabe with seemingly no workable ideas is
neither here nor there. After all, he speaks such good English when
he insults the British and the Americans and oh, look at how elegantly
he wears his British suits!
Likewise, those for whom
Mugabe mainly represents the celebration of state violence and oppression
against the citizens will see no redeeming qualities in the man
no matter what he does.
Mugabe, therefore, will
have no net gain in credibility from his win. He is also unlikely
to have any net loss in credibility, but the chances of a net loss
are higher than that of a net gain. This depends on factors like
whether he can control himself from permitting the brutalization
of opposition leaders by the police and then delightedly crowing
about it. It is this kind of short-sighted previous buffoonery that
has contributed to the current reality in which he will in many
respects still be a "loser" even if he "wins"
the election.
An interesting aspect
of the corner Mugabe has worked himself into with the notoriety
that he seems to enjoy, but which has been so costly to the country,
is that many people would not believe his victory was clean and
legitimate even if it was. More than at any time before, the only
electoral outcome which many onlookers would believe to be "free
and fair" would be the one that is not going to happen: his
losing!
So whatever the election
"win" will represent for Mugabe, a significant strengthening
of his international legitimacy will not be one of them. His opponents
will assume electoral crookedness in his win and his supporters
will not care whether his continuing in power was because he genuinely
won the most votes or not.
Mugabe's "win"
will mean business as usual for him and his ruling clique. It will
also mean there is no reason to expect any change in the country's
fortunes. The "illegal sanctions" that Mugabe blames for
his utter helplessness to make any positive change will continue,
the increasingly desperate economic experiments will continue, inflation
will continue shooting up and so on. A Mugabe "win" means
nothing would have changed to give even his supporters any reason
to hope that these things will be brought under control or reversed.
For Mugabe, his new mandate
will mean he will continue to have power in the physical, military
sense, which perhaps is all that matters to him now. He can hire
and fire ministers and other functionaries, he can make life uncomfortable
for opponents, he can preside over ceremonial things and so forth,
but there is no reason to believe that he will be any better able
to deal with the day to day issues of survival that occupy most
Zimbabweans than he has been in the last several years of steep
decline. His presidential role will ever more be that of tin-pot
dictator, not leader and motivator/facilitator of positive change.
It is very difficult
to know if the opposition MDC is coming or going, so confusing is
the state of affairs between its two factions and within them. Even
if they had their act together, there is no way to tell what kind
of government they would make. But clearly, if it were possible
to have a "free and fair" election, their presidential
candidate would have a very good chance of convincingly beating
Mugabe just on the basis of the disastrous state of the country
after his 27 years at the helm, and his utter lack of any credible
plan to change that situation. He is not even pretending to have
anything to offer.
Given the foregoing,
the lone permissible outcome of Mugabe's assured win on March 29,
by hook or by crook, is an assured loss for Zimbabwe.
Chido Makunike
is a Zimbabwean social and political commentator. He can be contacted
on e-mail: chidomakunike@gmail.com
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|