|
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
2008 harmonised elections - Index of articles
Exiled
Zimbabweans can vote wherever they are
Geoffrey
Nyarota, The Zimbabwe Times
January 23, 2008
http://www.thezimbabwetimes.com/page421.htm
Exiled Zimbabweans can
vote in the forthcoming general elections, wherever they may be
situated in the Diaspora and they do not even need to be registered
on the voters' roll.
Zimbabwe's export earnings
peaked at US$3, 4 billion in 1997. Last year's export earnings were
expected to generate only about US$1, 3 billion in foreign currency
in a situation of persistent decline, despite the massive increases
in global commodity prices.
Meanwhile, remittances
from exiled Zimbabweans, estimated at anything between two and three
million, now constitute roughly 50 percent of the foreign exchange
earnings available to the country's economy. At an estimated US$100
million a month the remittances now match the value of export earnings.
These remittances, which represent the sweat and sacrifice of the
Zimbabwean expatriate community, who in many cases eke a living
in the Diaspora to support families back at home, have therefore
become an important and reliable source of hard currency for Zimbabwe.
The Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe
has become notorious for printing the trillions of Zimbabwe dollars
used to purchase foreign currency on the streets, thus fuelling
the depreciation of our currency as well as run-away inflation,
now estimated at more than 24 000 percent.
The hundreds of thousands
of Zimbabweans, who have access to the US$100 million remitted monthly
by relatives in the Diaspora, now make regular shopping pilgrimages
to South Africa, Botswana and, of all the places, Zambia, Malawi
and Mozambique. Mozambique has even dispensed with the need for
visas in order to facilitate the inflow of foreign currency brought
into the country by desperate Zimbabweans.
Exiled Zimbabweans now
represent a reliable source of considerable levels of foreign currency
for their arrogant and ungrateful government. Their foreign currency
remittances also cushion ordinary Zimbabweans from the suffering
that their government otherwise inflicts upon them daily.
If Zimbabwean
exiles were to withhold these
remittances, that action would have an immediate and catastrophic
impact on the Zimbabwean economy, apart from condemning millions
of Zimbabweans to abject poverty and the threat of instant starvation.
Petroleum supplies would be instantly crippled, for instance. So
would the already diminished supply of electricity, a large percentage
of which is imported from neighbouring countries.
While the Diaspora community
now plays a crucial role in sustaining their country's economy and
ensuring the welfare of citizens, they are not officially recognized
by their government. In fact they are ridiculed, especially by President
Robert Mugabe.
They are denied the vote.
Zimbabwe faces landmark elections in March which, for the first
time, will harmonize presidential, parliamentary and local government
polls.
While the Diaspora community
will not vote, they have the power to influence the outcome of the
election. They, in fact, constitute a powerful voting block. Their
hard-earned foreign currency remittances could easily become their
ballot paper if wisely used.
If the entire Diaspora
population were to withhold any remittances to Zimbabwe during the
month of February, the last month before the March 2008 elections,
that action would have profound ramifications on the conduct and
outcome of the elections.
The government would
be denied of 50 percent of the foreign currency available to it
at a crucial period. Deprived of foreign currency ordinary Zimbabweans,
the electorate, would be confronted by the harsh reality of the
extent to which they have become dependent on the goodwill of kith
and kin in the Diaspora.
In the absence of the
US$100 million safety cushion, which is inflated from the Diaspora,
the population would suddenly come face-to-face with the ravages
of the economic melt-down. Even the rural electorate would approach
the polling stations in a state of unmitigated anger. The task of
the opposition would be to ensure that all registered voters actually
go to the polls on election day.
Smith was dislodged from
power in 1980 through a protracted and bloody guerilla war waged
from outside the country. Mugabe could, likewise, be defeated, partly
through such a bloodless coup orchestrated from the Diaspora
Yes, our people may suffer
as a result but that is a sacrifice they may have to make for the
future well-being of our nation. Zimbabweans made worse sacrifices
and took greater risks during the protracted war of independence.
Provision would be allowed in life-threatening situations, such
as the purchase of medical prescriptions.
Suffering and sacrifice
are indispensable elements of any revolution inspired by the quest
for political change.
It is absurd that the
citizens of Zimbabwe should collectively sit back while waiting
for President Thabo Mbeki to reach out across the Limpopo to deliver
them from suffering and humiliation at the hands of those they elected
to power long before Mbeki became president. Neither should Zimbabweans
expect Tsvangirai and Mutambara, each in his own way to rescue them,
while they subject them to incessant and arrogant criticism and
condemnation.
For this strategy to
achieve maximum effect Zimbabwean politicians would have to play
a complementary role in the national interest. Morgan Tsvangirai,
Arthur Mutambara, Jonathan Moyo, and any other progressive politicians
in the ranks of the opposition would have to cast their petty, divisive
and ethnic differences aside to mount a united campaign against
Zanu-PF. If Mugabe and PF-Zapu leader, the late Dr Joshua Nkomo,
could join hands in the interests of national salvation, why should
Tsvangirai and Welshman Ncube not be able to do so?
Dr Simba Makoni, who
has not denied persistent reports, especially in the British press,
that he is planning to launch a new political party, should seriously
consider joining hands with existing opposition politicians. Otherwise
he and retired general, Solomon Mujuru, said to be his ally, will
forever be condemned for splitting the opposition campaign while
strengthening the hand of a beleaguered Mugabe a few weeks before
the elections.
Sections of the seemingly
omniscient British press may say they are the most serious challenge
ever to be faced by Mugabe within his party, but the elections scheduled
for much will not be Zanu-PF primaries.
Zimbabweans must of necessity
assume ownership of the process of post-independence liberation
and democratization. They must look back with pride well into the
future and be able to say without hesitation, "We liberated
ourselves twice from the ravages of discrimination, oppression,
deprivation, dictatorship and humiliation."
Despite an aura of arrogance
and invincibility, Mugabe and Zanu-PF are certainly not invincible.-The
Zimbabwe Times.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|