| |
Back to Index
Kenya
and the myth of 'African barbarism'
Julie
Hearn, Spiked Online
January 10, 2008
http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/4260/
'Tribal
violence-, 'genocide- and comparisons with Rwanda
in 1994 characterised the early international media coverage of
the post-election crisis in Kenya at the beginning of 2008. Such
sensationalist reporting was not only analytically unhelpful - it
was also irresponsibly dangerous. Kenya is not Rwanda, nor is it
the metaphor for irrational, barbaric, 'primordial-
African violence that the Western psyche seems to have an insatiable
need for. Kenya must be understood on its own terms.
As the Kenya
Human Rights Commission has bravely borne witness to in its work,
elections in 1992, 1997, 2002 and the 2005 referendum vote have
all been accompanied by political violence1.
For example, in the aftermath of the 1992 elections, Africa Watch-s
report noted: 'President Daniel arap Moi of Kenya confidently
predicted that the return of his country to a multiparty system
would result in an outbreak of tribal violence that would destroy
the nation. His prediction has been alarmingly fulfilled. One of
the most disturbing developments in Kenya over the last two years
has been the eruption of violent clashes between different ethnic
groups . . . So far, Africa Watch estimates that the clashes have
left at least 1,500 people dead and 300,000 displaced.- 2
Political violence
is not new to Kenya and those in power have always used ethnicity
to maintain their position. The modern state of Kenya was built
on colonial force and the political manipulation of ethnic identity.
At the height of colonialism, ethnic organisations were actively
encouraged to counter a national consciousness and all national
organisations, except for religious institutions, were banned 3.
Hence it was 'natural- to portray the country-s
bloody independence struggle as atavistic. Kenya-s history
is crammed full of examples of British colonialism-s tried
and tested strategy of divide and rule. But it is important to remember
that when the Kenyan electorate were finally free to vote at independence
in 1963, they elected the Kenyan African National Union (KANU),
with its nationalist vision, and not the ethnically-based federalism
of the Kenya African Democratic Union (KADU), the departing colonial
administration-s preference.
Post-independence
politics in many African countries has been characterised by what
Africa expert Morris Szeftel describes as 'the dependence
of the African petty bourgeoisie on access to the state and its
resources. In the context of underdevelopment, local accumulation
rests heavily on political power and the ability it provides to
appropriate public resources.- He continues: 'The problem
is how to find a niche somewhere between underdevelopment and the
domination exercised over the local economy by foreign capital . . .
Ruling elites learn that gate-keeping functions (trade licences,
contracts, foreign exchange) bring huge rewards (far greater and
with far fewer costs than legitimate business).- 4
It is not only
accumulation that is dependent on access to the state but also political
support. Via the mechanism of clientalism, those in public office
can distribute development projects and more clandestine resources
in return for loyalty and votes 5.
Both these processes
have been 'ethnicised- 6.
Kenya-s first president, Jomo Kenyatta, set the ball rolling
from independence in 1963, and spent 15 years installing Kikuyu
hegemony until Daniel arap Moi replaced him in 1978. For the next
24 years, Moi attempted to dismantle this hegemony and create networks
of economic and political power based on ethnic Kalenjis, until
Mwai Kibaki, a Kikuyu, became president in 2002. In the 45 years
of Kenya-s independence, other large ethnic groupings have
been economically and politically marginalised. This has been particularly
true for the Luo, the ethnic group that Raila Odinga, Kibaki-s
recent election opponent, comes from. It is important to note that
although politics has been deliberately ethnicised, from above,
many Kenyans have actively opposed this from below, right from the
colonial era through to the present.
Such a political
system, at key flashpoints such as elections, produces both cynically
organised violence and the righteous indignation of an aggrieved
citizenry. First, there is the immediate widespread fury of voters
that the exercise of their democratic right was not taken seriously,
but instead was merely a plaything in the hands of those in power.
Why vote? Why believe in democracy? Second, there is anger at an
even deeper level. For some, these elections represented a potential
break with the corrupted political system, a rejection of ethnically
entrenched politics and the possibility of a completely different
way of doing politics. It is a slim hope, but a hope that many felt.
Third, there is the despair that the same communities are losing
out yet again: 50 years of independence, 50 years of exclusion.
These are some of the motivations that lied behind the peaceful
protests and the depth of anger and desolation is represented by
those interviewed who said that they were willing to die.
The cynically
organised violence comes in two forms, the formal and the informal.
Police were firing live shots into the crowds of protesters, including
those who were unarmed. The informal violence, including road blocks
and their ethnically targeted intimidation, is carried out by vigilante
groups, some with connections to local and national politicians,
in government and in opposition. Observers have warned about the
rise of vigilantism as a form of political violence, and now we
see tragically why 7.
As the popular
East African proverb notes, when two elephants fight it is the grass
that suffers. Kibaki has used the full force of the state in the
shape of live ammunition, water cannon and tear gas while Odinga
has relied for his show of strength on supporters to come out on
to the streets as cannon fodder. Both are seasoned politicians;
indeed, Odinga was Kibaki-s kingmaker. Referring to the above
proverb, Peter Kimani grimly notes: 'But if all the grass
is destroyed, the sage should have added, there will be no grass
left for the elephants to feed on.- 8
It is the everyday
heroic and pragmatic humanism of ordinary Kenyans, wananchi, which
has acted as a countervailing force throughout Kenya-s history
to the powder keg of politically manipulated ethnicity. As Ngugi
wa Thiong-o reminds us, there are only two tribes in Kenya:
the haves and the have-nots 9. Kenya
and Kenyan lives are in a precarious position, balanced between
the politics of what Colin Leys, drawing on Rosa Luxemburg, calls
'capitalism-produced barbarism- and the nation-s
reservoir of humanity 10.
It is critical
that we understand and accurately interpret the causes of Kenya-s
political violence, provide comfort to its victims and support those
inside and outside the country struggling to change the politics
of underdevelopment. Challenging the racist discourse of 'African
violence- behind the sensationalist international reporting
is part of that process.
Julie Hearn
is a lecturer in politics and development at the University of Lancaster.
Notes
- Kenya Human
Rights Commission
- Human Rights
Watch/Africa Watch (1993) Divide and Rule: State-Sponsored Ethnic
Violence in Kenya, p1
- Furedi,
F. (1994) Colonial Wars and the Politics of Third World Nationalism,
I.B. Tauris
- Szeftel,
M. (2000) 'Between Governance & Underdevelopment: Accumulation
& Africa-s "Catastrophic Corruption", Review
of African Political Economy 84, pp. 287 & 302
- Szeftel,
M. (2000) 'Clientalism, Corruption & Catastrophe-,
Review of African Political Economy 85
- This map
on the BBC website provides the following breakdown: Gikuyu (20
per cent), Luo (14 per cent), Luhya (13 per cent), Kalenjin (11
per cent), Kamba (11 per cent) with the remainder divided among
Kenya-s smaller communities
- Warigi,
G. (2007) 'Kenya: Vigilantes on the Rise-, BBC World
Service.com, 11 October 2007, Kenya: Vigilantes On The Rise; Kagwanja,
P. (2003) 'Facing Mount Kenya or Facing Mecca? the Mungiki,
Ethnic Violence and the Politics of the Moi Succession in Kenya,
1987-2002-, African Affairs 102
- Kimani, P.
(2008) A Past of Power More Than Tribe in Kenya-s Turmoil,
Open Democracy, 2 January 2008
- Wa Thiong-o,
N. (2007) The Choices Before Us: Reflections on Mwai Kibaki &
the 2007 Kenya General Election, 17 December 2007
- Leys, C.
(1994) 'Confronting the African Tragedy-, New Left
Review 204, p. 34.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|