| |
Back to Index
Solidarity
with Zimbabwe: Another side to the xenophobia story
Koni Benson
August 13, 2007
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=2&ItemID=13524
The dominant story in
the mainstream press these days is that the South African poor act
out of desperation when migrants and refugees are violently attached.
That the 'problem' is competition for scarce resources and that
SA must first get its house in order, and solve the poverty crisis,
and then desperate South Africans will stop lashing out at desperate
asylum seekers.
This story of displaced frustration and resentment does not fairly
represent the range of opinions, and even more importantly, organized
actions of the poor and working class in South Africa who invest
precious resources in directly supporting refugees and migrants,
especially in the case of Zimbabweans right now.
In fact, new research is showing that while xenophobia is rampant
and often played out amongst the poor in South Africa, it is also
precisely some of the poorest South Africans living in shack and
townships who have been the most sympathetic to the struggles of
Zimbabweans worst effected by the current crisis.
South African movements of the working class have mobilized around
the politics playing out in Zimbabwe right now. In fact, the issue
of Zimbabwe has captured the attention and has been prioritized
by grassroots activists in South Africa. These are groups of people
many of whom are unemployed and cannot often find taxi fare to meet,
and struggle with the challenge of solidarity within the same neighborhoods
and same city to fight for basic survival like water, housing, electricity,
and health care. Yet, they are taking a stand on Zimbabwe. Why?
This support is not only forthcoming out of sympathy for the hardships
inflicted by the power wars of Mugabe and the like, but rooted in
the believe that like during repression of activism during the liberation
struggle in South Africa, international solidarity is decisive right
now for Zimbabweans who are resisting an 'elite transition' which
will not change the structures of inequality in any meaningful way
for the poor. At the recent Towards
an Africa Without Borders Conference in Durban, one Bulawayo
debt cancellation activist argued for solidarity between the poor
in South Africa and in Zimbabwe because our interests are in the
same pot.
South African activists at the conference likewise argued that "we
see our problem as rooted in poverty and elite deal making, which
sees no international boundaries." In this view, President
Mbeki and his SADC counterparts will not act against the Mugabe
regime in defense of the Zimbabwean people- rather, they are angling
for an 'elite transition' similar to the ones in South Africa, Namibia,
Nigeria and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) where those who
have the backing of the rich and powerful, work out among themselves
how to divide the power and money. From this perspective, the majority
of the people are excluded from the process and inevitably the resulting
system leaves them at the mercy of the oppressors and exploiters
and trapped in the associated poverty and social crises.
With this motivation to mobilize, over 2,500 people come out in
protest in Durban to criticize the Mugabe regime. Abahlali baseMjondolo
has hosted
members of the Combined
Harare Residents' Association (CHRA) in shack settlements, worked
with the Zimbabwe
Crisis Coalition, and written comparisons of Murambatsvina and
shack demolitions in South Africa. In Cape Town, People Against
Suppression and Oppression of People (PASSOP) have held regular
pickets. The TAC and the Social Movements Indaba have appointed
Africa desks to better address the issues. These movements have
an impressively clearly defined 'enemy' so to speak- and it is not
displaced Zimbabweans crossing the border in search of survival.
In Cape Town for example, women from a range of grassroots organizations
from seasonal women farm workers, to refugee women, to anti-eviction
activists, to unionists, to wellness centers organizers came together
after the March 11th violent attacks on women activists in Zimbabwe
to analyze the relationship between state and domestic violence
and speak out on the way elite politics were being played out across
women's bodies.
They argued that: "We see no distinction between domestic and
state violence, or between Zimbabwe and South Africa when it comes
to responding to the attack on our sisters. the violent the victimisation
of everyday women through demolition of houses and businesses in
Operation Murambatsvina, and as political and feminist activists
has a specific dynamic where women are hardest hit, and attacked
on multiple levels at once." They collectively wrote a solidarity
statement and in April held a picket on the days the Zimbabwe
Congress of Trade Unions (ZCTU) convened a stay away. "We
write this statement to acknowledge and listen to the pain of Zimbabwean
women and to support their quest to become full citizens which we
in South Africa are also fighting for. We recognise that in the
context of poverty, displacement, violence, and exclusion state
oppression adds another unbearable layer to women's oppression which
we are determined to fight together.We in South Africa know too
well the gap between the hard earned theories set out in law, and
the reality of women's access to justice in practice".
Most interestingly these women welcomed Zimbabweans into South Africa,
arguing: "We recognise the national boundary between us and
Zimbabwe as a colonial creation and just as we were welcomed into
Zimbabwe during our struggle, we welcome Zimbabweans fighting for
a free Zimbabwe into South Africa."
These organisations of the working class who maybe small and weak
but they are adamant to support Zimbabweans worst affected by the
ongoing power struggles above. Their perspectives and actions are
being overlooked in official talk about Zimbabwean refugees 'flooding'
across the border and the rhetorical questions of how South Africa
can possibly help because of poverty issues 'at home'. In fact,
South African poor are arguing that the melt down in Zimbabwe shares
its roots with the same forces rapidly entrenching poverty across
the region. It is precisely this support by struggling South Africans
for Zimbabweans who are attempting to organise for an alternative
Zimbabwe that is being ignored in the press and falling further
and further off the radar of the South African imagination of the
poor who are continually painted as inherently xenophobic.
*Koni Benson is a researcher at the International Labour Research
and Information Group in Cape Town.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|