|
Back to Index
Public
disclosure and celebrities: Whose right is it to know?
Fungai
Machirori
July 27, 2007
http://english.ohmynews.com/ArticleView/article_view.asp?menu=A11100&no=374106&rel_no=1&back_url=
A view held by many is that once a person chooses
to become public figure, he or she loses all rights and privileges
involved in leading a private life. This, it seems, is the quid
pro quo, or the 'something for something' ideology that surrounds
fame - that all accolades, adulation and respect earned should come
at the price of the loss of privacy and rest from the public's glare.
And this ceaseless desire to 'know all' recently
centred on Zimbabwean music legend, Oliver 'Tuku' Mtukudzi, whose
HIV status disclosure in one of the local Saturday newspapers appealed
to the curiosities of so many readers.
"I wasn't going to buy the newspaper, but when
I saw that Tuku was going to reveal his status, I was eager to know
more," said one person. In the article, Mtukudzi is quoted
from another media source as saying that he does not have AIDS.
"I'll be very blunt and say that he didn't
disclose anything," noted Tendayi Westerhof of the Public Personalities
Against AIDS Trust (PPAAT). "People living with HIV don't have
AIDS. Rather, they develop it," she added.
Westerhof herself is a public figure who has disclosed
her positive HIV status, and written an autobiography about her
life.
But is it really anyone's business - collectively
as members of the general public - to demand to know the status
of any person?
"Primarily, one's HIV status is a private thing,"
observed Tawanda Maguze, the Programmes Coordinator with the Patsimeredu
Edutainment Trust. "No one should be pushed to disclose if
they do not feel comfortable about it."
Comfortable is barely the word that one would use
to describe the circumstances surrounding Mtukudzi's disclosure.
For many years, rumours have been rife about his general health
and HIV status, and the singer has publicly acknowledged losing
members of his band, The Black Spirits, to AIDS-related illnesses.
In his songs, Mutukudzi addresses the social ills of alcohol abuse,
domestic violence, poverty and the unnecessary spread of HIV.
But fans have often speculated that the singer himself
is HIV positive, and have waited anxiously at many concerts and
events that he has performed at, for him to disclose this information.
"If I were him, I'd encourage him to lead by
example in the same way he has been encouraging others in his songs,"
added Westerhof referring in particular to the sing Todii, in which
the singer asks what shall be done about the growing HIV epidemic.
"He asks us what we shall do, and I think he should lead by
example and fight stigma," she said, encouraging the singer
to have an HIV test and know his own status - something which he
might have
already done.
But it seems
that in the public's haste to know all about their leaders and heroes,
especially HIV advocates and activists, they forget that they too
are human beings with the inherent right to privacy, and to choose
when and whether to disclose their HIV status publicly - regardless
of their being either HIV positive or negative. Disclosure should
only be undertaken by those who have prepared for all the possible
outcomes of this, such as fearful and ignorant attitudes, as well
as discrimination. But more importantly, disclosure should be a
choice.
"Discloure
is and remains a voluntary decision," emphasised Lynde Francis,
the Director of The
Centre, a local non-governmental organisation (NGO) whose mission
is to provide a holistic approach to the national management of
HIV and AIDS to people both infected and affected to enable them
to live positively with the virus." You don't go around asking
people to disclose their blood sugar level, so why should it be
any different with HIV?" She added that disclosure, unless
one had decided to be open about their status, should only be on
a need-to-know basis as in the doctor-patient relationship, where
disclosure might prove crucial.
These same arguments
around disclosure have been prominent, particularly in South Africa,
following the public HIV testing undertaken by South African Health
Minister, Nozizwe Madlala-Routledge late last year. Anti-HIV activists
and groups saw this as a positive move towards leadership appreciating
the gravity of the epidemic in that country. Many have put pressure
on other government officials, especially President Thabo Mbeki
to also take a public HIV test.
"No one asks Bill Clinton or Bill Gates to
go for a test, or to disclose their status, but they are just as
committed as anyone to responding positively to HIV, "observed
Francis. "This has to be a private decision."
There is of
course benefit in public figures being open about HIV and their
status. As Maguze noted, "If people in the public sphere disclose,
it diffuses the secrecy that shrouds issues to do with HIV and AIDS."
One such example is that of Lucky Mazibuko, the first South African
journalist to disclose his positive HIV status, built a following
for his column which sought to demystify the virus. In one of these
articles, he declared of his efforts, "HIV has taught me to
be selfless, to share my experience, my time, my love, my possessions
and my passion with the rest of humankind."
And being passionate about HIV and AIDS work and
advocacy does not mean being HIV positive, or HIV negative for that
matter. Passion means concerted effort towards providing holistic
interventions that will help to curb not only new infections, but
potential illness in those already living with the virus. One public
figure, the epitome of this vision was Omolulu Falobi, the slain
Nigerian activist who was a founder member of the successful Journalists
Against AIDS Network. And at his Zimbabwean memorial service held
last year, tributes did not centre on anything less than the overwhelming
contribution he made to the response to HIV. As one person eulogised,
"His work was so profound, that I never really got the chance
to ask him whether he was in fact HIV positive himself. It really
didn't matter."
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|