|
Back to Index
Spitting
on the dead dictator
Ariel Dorfman
December 17, 2006
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-oe-dorfman17dec17,1,3930190.story
WHEN GEN. Augusto Pinochet breathed
his last on Dec. 10, this much seemed clear to everybody in Chile:
The man who had lived his whole life and never paid for even one
of his crimes had done it again. Once more — one final time — everybody
in Chile thought that Pinochet had escaped judgment. Everybody,
that is, except for a young man named Francisco Cuadrado Prats,
who decided that some sort of punishment, no matter how symbolic,
was merited. So he walked up to Pinochet's coffin and deliberately,
calmly spat on the dictator's face as he lay there in full regalia.
The story of that young man is also,
of course, the story of Chile. Though it culminates at Pinochet's
funeral, it started 33 years ago, in late August 1973, when the
grandfather of the young man, Gen. Carlos Prats, was commander in
chief of the Chilean army. Feeling he could no longer stop the impending
military coup against President Salvador Allende, Prats resigned
his post and recommended that his replacement be the most loyal
of his generals, a man he had befriended and protected his whole
life — Augusto Pinochet.
I was working at the presidential palace
and can remember how glad, almost giddy, we were when Allende followed
Prats' advice. At a farewell gathering honoring Prats, the name
Pinochet was on all our lips. He was someone we could trust, someone
who would save democracy and avoid the violence descending upon
us. Among those present at the party were Allende's last two ministers
of defense, Jose Toha and Orlando Letelier. They relied on their
"friend" Augusto, "good old Pinochet," to rescue the republic from
disaster.
One week later, Sept. 11, 1973, Allende
was dead, Toha and Letelier were prisoners of a military junta and
Prats had been banished to Argentina. Good old Pinochet had betrayed
his president, his friends and his country.
But that was not enough. The new ruler
had to be rid of the men who had believed in him, who had seen him
obsequiously swearing allegiance to the president, who had witnessed
his duplicity. Toha was murdered in a Chilean dungeon a few months
after the coup. Letelier was assassinated in Washington in 1976.
As to Carlos Prats, he and his wife were blown up on a Buenos Aires
street on Sept. 30, 1974, by agents of Pinochet's secret police.
Francisco Cuadrado Prats was 6 when
he heard the news that his grandparents had been killed. In the
years that followed, many more Chileans would disappear, be tortured
or murdered by the man who had been his grandfather's best friend.
But not all was despair. The grandson
would also watch and participate in the Chileans' movement to defeat
the dictator and recover their lost democracy. By 1990, Pinochet
no longer ruled the country. But for the next eight years, he thwarted
the emergence of a full democracy by using various authoritarian
features of the system and his role as commander in chief of the
army. He threatened rebellion at whim, publicly warning Chile's
elected leaders, for instance, that if they dared touch, let alone
prosecute, one of the men under his command, he would rise up again.
There appeared to be virtually no chance that justice would be done.
Then, almost miraculously, Pinochet
was arrested in London in 1998 after Spanish authorities charged
him with murder, torture, illegal detention and disappearances.
He escaped extradition to Spain by feigning dementia, but upon his
return to Chile, he found that the country had changed. Some of
the fear he had inspired was gone. The judiciary and politicians,
shamed before the world by the charges issued in Spain, were ready
to indict him for all manner of human rights violations. Among the
cases was the murder of Carlos Prats and his wife, Sophia.
But Pinochet's lawyers, often with
the connivance of sluggish judges and a wary political class, successfully
delayed the numerous proceedings against the dictator, and he never
was convicted of anything. (Chilean judges denied on a technicality
an Argentine magistrate's demand that the general be extradited
for trial in Prats' murder.)
Then, just when death seemed to protect
Pinochet from punishment, insult was added to injury when the former
dictator was rewarded with funeral rites he didn't deserve. Although
President Michelle Bachelet (herself a torture victim whose father
died of maltreatment in Pinochet's prisons) refused to give the
dead dictator a state funeral, she could not stop the army from
burying him with full honors.
It was too much for Prats' grandson.
Let me confess that spitting on a dead
man — even if he is responsible for the deaths of so many of my
friends, the devastation of my life and the agony of my country
— makes me feel queasy and uncomfortable. There is something sacred
about the dead, about their sad vulnerability, about the rules and
protocols that we need to honor when a life, no matter how miserable,
has ended.
Yet, who can blame Francisco Cuadrado
Prats? His was the tiniest of revolts, barely two or three seconds
long (after which he was beaten and kicked by rabid Pinochet supporters
before being rescued by a group of military policemen), but it spoke
for his murdered grandparents and for all the mutilated and missing
bodies of his land. It expressed what millions of Chileans had long
dreamed of doing and what only one of us finally dared to do.
I wish this were the end of the story.
But there is a bizarre epilogue. Pinochet
also has a grandson, an officer in the Chilean army. He also wanted
to vindicate his grandfather's honor, also felt that justice had
not been done. In an unscheduled appearance at the funeral, Capt.
Augusto Pinochet Molina, flouting all military regulations, stood
up and delivered an impassioned defense of the dictator's life and
work, denouncing all who had persecuted him. The next day, he was
expelled from the army.
Yet his was the most applauded speech
at the funeral. This grandson of Pinochet expressed what many followers
of the dead general, inside and outside the armed forces, feel but
do not dare articulate: that Pinochet is the greatest man in the
history of Chile and one of the towering figures of the 20th century,
a man who saved his country from communism and opened it up to free-market
economics. The suffering, the presumed suffering, of a few does
not matter because it was the birth pang of a new world.
There is the true story of Chile, told
by two grandsons of generals. For reconciliation to occur in Chile,
the grandson of Carlos Prats would have to forget the death of his
grandfather, renounce all desire for justice, betray the deepest
sources of his wounded identity. Or the grandson of Augusto Pinochet
would have to accept that his grandfather was a murderer and ask
forgiveness for the dead man's actions.
Neither of these grandsons will ever
be able to do this. Francisco will not take back the moment when
he spat on the body of his grandfather's enemy. Augusto will not
take back the moment when he spoke out as the victor of history,
spoke out in the name of his family.
And the heartbreaking story of Chile
is that there was a time many years ago — so remote it almost seems
mythical — when their grandfathers dreamed that these boys might
visit each other and play with each other and might have been, perhaps,
who knows, the best of friends.
* Ariel Dorfman is the author of
"Exorcising Terror" and "Burning City."
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|