|
Back to Index
Civil
society threatened by political 'incest'
Trudy Stevenson
August 18, 2006
http://www.theindependent.co.zw/viewinfo.cfm?linkid=21&id=5257
Read Pedzisai
Ruhanya's response to this article
Read Combined
Harare Residents Association's response to this article
Read Mike Davies response
to this article
I HAVE watched with interest
over the past few years as civil society organised itself into interest
groups — residents, journalists and women as well as constitutional
and human rights groups — joining the traditional trade and
student unions and churches. Indeed, some of the first civil society
groups I had dealings with were obviously in bed with government,
with ministers etc as their patrons and trustees.
During the -90s
the phenomenon of new — ie post-Zanu versus Zapu — opposition
politics became established, first with the Zimbabwe Unity Movement,
then the Forum Party, the Zimbabwe Union of Democrats and United
Parties while there was also the revival of Zanu-Ndonga and the
UANC. In 1999 the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) was formed.
Meanwhile stronger and
more confrontational civil society groups made their voices heard.
Some were born long before but took on a new life, such as the Catholic
Commission for Peace and Justice (CCJP) which had stood up for the
majority and against human rights abuses during the Smith regime
but now stood up for the same majority against the Mugabe government
when the abuses of Gukurahundi were perpetrated.
CCJP-s publication
of Breaking the Silence — Building True Peace, about the atrocities
in Matabeleland and Midlands during Gukurahundi, was a milestone
for civil society. It caused serious conflict among those who had
carried out the research project, and the Catholic bishops tried
to avoid publication, in the end, probably fearing retribution by
the state, but it was much too late to put a lid on such well-grounded
and widespread research.
Mike Auret, later MP
for Harare Central briefly until hounded into ill-health by the
Zanu PF government he had originally championed, was director of
the CCJP during this period, and to his eternal credit, stood up
for the tenets of his faith and the CCJP motto: if you want peace,
fight for justice.
Other non-governmental
organisations were more or less successful and more or less straightforward.
ZimRights started off well but had problems under the chairmanship
of Nick Ndebele, with accusations of both corruption and vote-rigging
in the organisation widespread.
The National
Constitutional Assembly (NCA) was one of the first "umbrella"
civil organisations launched with tremendous hype and enthusiasm
in the UZ Great Hall, with Margaret Dongo, then an independent MP,
as the guest of honour.
In retrospect, the platform
given to an "opposition" politician certainly sowed
the first seeds of strife within the NCA, and planted the idea in
the minds of the general public that it was OK and indeed desirable
to have opposition politicians actively participating in NGOs either
directly or behind the scenes. After all, this is what Zanu PF officials
did with their own set of NGOs. Thus it was that NGOs and civil
organisations became politicised without anyone really questioning
the wisdom of this.
It may even have continued
to work fairly well, with the "government" set of NGOs
and the "opposition" set, except that government soon
became jealous even of its own NGOs, which commanded more resources
and more influence among donors than government itself!
I recall overhearing
two former Zanu PF women MPs bemoaning the fact that NGOs were more
powerful than government some 10 years ago. This was around the
time some powerful women politicians tried to take over the Association
of Women-s Clubs, resulting in a court battle and a section
of the Private and Voluntary Organisations Act being declared unconstitutional
by the Supreme Court.
As the "opposition"
NGOs expanded and became increasingly militant and well-resourced,
government-s reaction was predictable: they must be controlled
and if possible closed down. Thus we had the NGO
Bill presented to the last parliament and even adopted at the
third reading, despite vigorous resistance and all-night debate.
Yet strangely, President Robert Mugabe never signed that Bill into
law. We now hear rumours that it will be modified (strengthened,
or weakened?) and represented — this remains to be seen.
Meanwhile NGOs continue
to operate on both sides of the political divide, and while many
manage to remain truly apolitical, others try unsuccessfully to
camouflage their partisanship in various ways.
The "Save
Zimbabwe" convention hosted recently by the Christian Alliance
highlighted the problem of partisanship. On the programme to make
presentations were the Zimbabwe
Congress of Trade Unions (ZCTU), the Zimbabwe
National Students- Union, the NCA, Crisis
and Women-s
Coalition.
The ZCTU presentation
began with Lucia Matibenga, vice-president of the labour movement
but also national chairperson of the MDC-Tsvangirai Women-s
Assembly.
Elizabeth Marunda, formerly
spokesperson for Crisis and also a member of the MDC-Tsvangirai,
made the Women-s Coalition presentation.
Lovemore Madhuku of NCA
conducted elections at the MDC-Tsvangirai congress earlier this
year, and many NCA structures comprise the very same people as the
MDC-Tsvangirai structures.
A similar situation
prevails in the Combined
Harare Residents Association, which ostensibly changed its constitution
earlier this year to ensure non-partisanship, but whose new structures
are in many wards led by MDC-Tsvangirai office-bearers. Its representative
on the national Zimbabwe United Residents Association is the MDC-Tsvangirai
organising secretary for Harare North, while its representative
in the NCA is or certainly was until recently MDC-Tsvangirai secretary
for Harare Province.
This politicisation of
civil society does not go unnoticed, nor is it likely to strengthen
civil society. Indeed, it is already causing disaffection.
More seriously, it has
become such a widespread incestuous relationship that instead of
civil society organising itself more widely, its organised members
are actually dwindling, since the same person holds positions in
several organisations at the same time!
Furthermore, someone
will chair one organisation one year and then move to another a
year or so later, round and round the circuit.
We should remember that
incest is forbidden in the Bible and in most cultures for the very
scientific reason that the product of incest is often weak in some
way, if not also physically deformed. Let us save our civil society
from a similar fate.
* Trudy
Stevenson is MDC legislator for Harare North.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|