THE NGO NETWORK ALLIANCE PROJECT - an online community for Zimbabwean activists  
 View archive by sector
 
 
    HOME THE PROJECT DIRECTORYJOINARCHIVESEARCH E:ACTIVISMBLOGSMSFREEDOM FONELINKS CONTACT US
 

 


Back to Index

Efforts of Zimbabwean people in fighting HIV and AIDS must be rewarded
Enida Friel
June 14, 2006

This week leaders from around the world including the Irish Taoiseach Bertie Ahern are in New York to attend the special UN session dedicated to HIV/AIDS UNGASS+5. There the UN Secretary General is reporting that Zimbabwe is one of the few countries in the developing world to have reduced the HIV prevalence rate. As UNAIDS announced last year the HIV prevalence rate in Zimbabwe has decreased from 26% in 2002 to 21% in 2004 and this was a further decrease from rates higher than 30% in the year 20001. Zimbabwe is the only country in Southern Africa - the region with the highest HIV prevalence rates in the world- to mark such a decline.

According to UNAIDS the decline is seen across the different age groups (including young people of 15-24 years old), among pregnant women screened while attending antenatal care services and also in rural and urban areas. This trend has been confirmed by different studies that international and national scientists have conducted in Zimbabwe and observed in the ground by Oxfam.

Behaviour change interventions that promote condom use, reduction of the number of sexual partners and delay of sexual debut appear to have contributed to this decline. These interventions often run by dedicated community based organizations have taken place in a very difficult political and economic context where donor money is scarce.

For a country with still a very high HIV prevalence rate (one in five pregnant women is still HIV positive), in a region, which is sadly, the epicentre of the AIDS epidemic, Zimbabwe has received little money to support their HIV/AIDS interventions. In fact Zimbabwe has received the least of funding compare to other countries not only in Southern Africa, but also rest of Africa. Of all the major HIV/AIDS sources of funding (Global Fund for AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria, World Bank Multi-Country HIV/AIDS Programme for Africa and US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief) only money from the Global Fund has been made available to Zimbabwe2.

As part of its HIV/AIDS portfolio Oxfam is supporting eight local organizations running programmes that focus on behaviour change, gender, care and support for HIV/AIDS. This support has been ongoing since 2002 and Oxfam is committed to continue supporting these partners in the future. However, this support along with that of other international organizations present in the country, cannot suffice to sustain nationwide comprehensive interventions that are now needed in Zimbabwe.

Although it looks like prevention efforts have paid off, treatment services remain very limited in Zimbabwe. Only 24,000 people out of an estimated 2 million that are HIV positive are receiving antiretroviral treatment (ART) in Zimbabwe3, while as much as 70% of hospital bed occupancy could be due to HIV/AIDS4.

Zimbabwe is now facing a food crisis, reasons of which are political, but poor rain falls in the country and HIV/AIDS have also contributed to it. UN estimates that 4 million people are in need of food. This is in a context where 700,000 people in urban areas have either been forcibly displaced or affected by the "Operation Clean Up". Inflation rates have hit 2000% and 80% of population is estimated to live under the poverty line. Communities are struggling and Oxfam's partner organizations are no exception. With families unable to pay transport and hospital fees, the pressure on home based care volunteers supported by Oxfam is mounting. They are having to be creative and engage in income generating activities so that the nutritional needs of their beneficiaries are met. With no option of ART for their beneficiaries, many volunteers are now also using herbs that can only treat a limited number of opportunistic infections.

Reasons for lack of funding to Zimbabwe are clear. Donors do not want to support a government that is largely blamed for the situation in which Zimbabwe is today, and also they do not want to risk their funding being politicised. These are understandable reasons, but at the same time local efforts that are trying to help vulnerable communities whether that is in the form of HIV/AIDS support or livelihood replenishment or simply food should be supported.

UN has a major role to play in Zimbabwe - they should intensify their efforts in convincing donors to support aid efforts in the country, but most importantly they should continue negotiating space and access for local and international NGOs that are trying to work in Zimbabwe. The Irish government, which is a donor of Zimbabwe and a contributor to the Global Fund for AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria, could also play a role in convincing other donors to 'reward' support to people that are persevering and having positive results even in difficult situations.

Zimbabwe was once considered by health specialists to have one of the best health infrastructures in Africa to implement an HIV/AIDS programme. With many qualified doctors and nurses now living Zimbabwe for better economic prospects in the West, soon it will be too late to sustain nationwide HIV/AIDS programme that can save lives in Zimbabwe.

At UNGASS+5 we will hear UNAIDS recommending to donors to support evidence-informed interventions that adhere to the 'Three Ones' principle (one AIDS national plan, one national coordinating body and one national monitoring and evaluation system). In Zimbabwe the 'Three Ones' are in place and there is evidence the HIV/AIDS programmes are working. World leaders have committed to make access to HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment universal by 2010 and Irish Government has now committed to spend ?100 million per year on fighting HIV/AIDS and other communicable diseases. Zimbabweans however will still have to hear what these commitments will mean for them.


1. The prevalence rate is now down to 20%
2. Disbursed so far $10 million
3. UN estimation (20,000 receiving ART through the public system, 4,000 receiving it through the not-for-profit sector MSF, mission hospitals)
4. Local health workers estimation

Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.

TOP