|
Back to Index
Zimbabwe:
A polarized society
Cosanna
Preston
Extracted
from Canadian Dimension: July/August 2005
July 28, 2005
http://www.canadiandimension.mb.ca/frame.htm
Roll into downtown
Harare and what you see may surprise you. The newest Mercedes sit
in front of five-star hotels and modern glass skyscrapers, while
suited men rush from one doorway to another, cell phones to their
ears. But look closer, and you might notice the commuters struggling
through malfunctioning traffic lights, or the occasional blip in
an office window as the power cuts, again. The success of sipping
from a water fountain or washing your hands depends on the day and,
if urban crops are in your possession, harvest them early or guard
them well from the hungry.
Indeed, these
polarizations are not exclusive to the capital city, but plague
the entire country of Zimbabwe. Socially, politically and economically,
the country is so divided that the often-clear division between
fact and propaganda is almost invisible—everyone has something to
gain and everything to lose.
At the heart
of the debate, President Robert Mugabe and his anti-imperialist,
nationalist supporters spar with the official opposition, the Movement
for Democratic Change (MDC) and the recently weakened civil societies.
They fight for the right to cast blame, seeking an end to the economic
chaos that has stricken the country.
A propaganda
war
"There’s
a propaganda war going on. There are forces on both sides playing
up the confrontation and trying to out-do each other," says
professor Sam Moyo, a native Zimbabwean and executive director of
the African Institute for Agrarian Studies.
Though exact
figures are impossible to find, the unemployment estimates average
at about 50 per cent, while the World Bank states a poverty level
of 75 per cent, and national data and the International Monetary
Fund (IMF) rate inflation at 132 per cent. Hospitals are running
out of medication, and recent droughts combined with contentious
land policies have caused severe food shortages, resulting in chronic
malnutrition and starvation.
"It’s impossible
to live comfortably in Zimbabwe. Even if you are well qualified
and well trained, the salary that you get in Zimbabwe will only
last you two weeks," explains Pius Ncube, archbishop of Bulawayo
and so-called "rebel priest," owing to his vocal opposition
to Mugabe. For him and other vocal activists, Mugabe and his Zimbabwe
African National Union Patriotic Front (ZANU PF) party—which recently
won another majority in parliament amidst accusations of fraud—are
responsible for the plight of the people.
Mugabe came to power at the dawn of Zimbabwe’s independence, in
1980. Since then, he has increasingly forced his people into a life
of fear, silencing any contesting force. He’s shut down independent
newspapers and radio stations; non-governmental organizations are
forced to register with the government, effectively disallowing
many from operating; and, under the Public Order and Security Act,
people cannot hold a public gathering without police permission,
but like nearly every other official, the police are partisan.
The role
of the West
Moyo
acknowledges intense political violence following the failed 2000
constitutional referendum and the following presidential elections
in 2002, but stresses that political violence significantly decreased
leading up to and during this year’s election. Unfortunately, he
feels the West has not given the decrease as much weight as it gave
the increase in violence years earlier.
The West plays
a recurrent factor in the plight of Zimbabwe, the number-one scapegoat
for Mugabe. Brian Kagoro, an activist constitutional lawyer in Zimbabwe
also points to Western external policies as a reason for Zimbabwe’s
decline. Though he says Mugabe has aggravated any sense of structure
in the country, there are many other factors that play into Zimbabwe’s
instability as well, such as Western antagonism of Mugabe and the
United States/European Union sanctions regime.
However, the
largest issue is the land redistribution from the whites to the
blacks. When Zimbabwe gained independence, Britain made the land
question untouchable for ten years. White farmers were permitted
to stay on their land, only open to willing-buyer, willing-seller
negotiations, hardly an attractive proposition for the poor and
recently liberated blacks.
At the ten-year
mark, the IMF arrived in Zimbabwe. Unable to influence the economy,
Mugabe had supported the social systems already in place, boosting
health care and creating a new generation of well educated blacks,
who he hired into the civil service. But, as Kagoro explains, the
IMF was unimpressed with Mugabe’s lack of fiscal management and
imposed structural-adjustment programs, forcing him to "roll
back" state involvement. This meant cutbacks in the civil service
and, more importantly, it meant the state could not redistribute
land.
In 2000, amidst
a growing threat from the MDC, the situation degraded further when
Mugabe orchestrated a series of violent land grabs from white farmers
by war veterans and used the ZANU youth militia to quell the opposition’s
supporters. Kagoro explains this came about in part because Zimbabwe’s
constitution supplies Mugabe with virtually unlimited power.
An ineffective
opposition
The
largely ineffective opposition doesn’t help matters. Once so threatening
that ZANU PF abandoned its more discreet day-to-day repression for
outright political violence of the youth militias, the MDC is fading
into the background, rapidly losing popular support and suffering
from a loss of seats in parliament.
"People
who took a risk by voting for the MDC in 2000 have seen themselves
punished—directly, in some cases, or just penalized socially and
politically—and haven’t seen that having an MDC opposition in parliament
has made a difference in the political process," says Dr. Guy
Thompson, who studies post-colonial Zimbabwean politics at the University
of Alberta.
Luckily, Thompson
notes, the MDC is the public and political face for a much larger
simmering resistance of civil-society and action groups like Kagoro’s
Crisis Coalition. But with the new NGO bill forcing them to register,
many of these groups are being forced into neighbouring South Africa,
unable to operate within Zimbabwe’s borders.
But Moyo says
there is still hope. With a firm majority in the hands of ZANU PF,
the party is looking to create a new constitution; something both
the opposition and the government agree is necessary. If the two
groups can focus on the content rather than on the political mileage
to be gained from a constitution, there could be hope for a more
stable future. Moyo notes the potential for the ZANU majority to
push through the changes without proper consultation, but says there
is no way of knowing what will actually happen.
Archbishop Ncube
isn’t quite so optimistic. At the end of the day he says Mugabe
will force what he wants. Recalling previous cases of harassment,
Ncube says Mugabe will silence any challenger.
"Opposition
MPs [have been] harassed and prosecuted, but they were not convicted.
They were tortured. One member of parliament told us he was stripped
naked, electro-shocked—he passed out and afterward he was ordered
to drink his own urine from the floor," Ncube informs.
One refugee,
now a member of the Edmonton Zimbabwean community, recalls receiving
such threats before he fled the country in 2001. As a public prosecutor
in Harare, he was faced with the difficult task of prosecuting the
same politicians who made the laws. Concerned for his safety, he
asked that his name not be used in this article.
The prosecutor’s
job involved working hand-in-hand with the police. Those police
were supposed to offer protection, but, as the threats mounted,
the lawyer soon realized the police would not be a safeguard. "When
we realized that, ‘Oh my God, we don’t have any protection,’ is
when we started really fearing those aspects." He recalls leaving
court many times and having to file through angry mobs protesting
his case arguments. He experienced threats, continuous harassing
phone calls and violent attacks, and was accused of trying to further
the interests of the MDC.
Many refugees
have similar stories. Another, who also asked not to be named, worked
as an elections monitor during the 2002 presidential elections,
widely believed to have been rigged. The monitor was constantly
harassed. He was beaten, robbed and threatened in the middle of
the night. The first time was the day before the election. He was
going home after picking up his election I.D. for his polling station
when he was jumped by six men, beaten with batons, kicked and slapped.
The men stole his wallet and his polling I.D.—anything to prevent
a fair election.
Moyo cautions
against such stories. While he doesn’t doubt their individual legitimacy,
he worries about their use in the propaganda war noting that both
sides have a tendency to pick select events, and use them as generalities.
"ZANU PF brings out the rosy things and [the opposition] focuses
on the worst," he says.
Moyo argues
that the human-rights issue is exaggerated. While he readily admits
it is a problem in Zimbabwe, he questions the heavy amount of attention
the alleged abuses have received in Western media, when much greater
atrocities surround the country’s borders. The bigger concern, Moyo
suggests, is the pending food crisis, though he quickly adds this
has less to do with the government and more to do with the drought
suffered during the production season.
Futures for Zimbabwe
Though
Mugabe will request and accept food aid this year, and though constitutional
consultation could occur, Ncube, Kagoro and Thompson don’t believe
much can truly change with Mugabe at the helm. Zimbabweans are left
with virtually no option but to wait for Mugabe, at 80 years of
age, either to step down in 2008 as promised, or die.
"The problem
is with Mugabe. He knows as soon as he’s out of power, he will be
prosecuted. He has created too many enemies within ZANU PF and outside.
Maybe what the people of Zimbabwe need to understand is that Mugabe
is afraid to leave office. If the people of Zimbabwe address that,
then maybe we can find a solution…. So this is where we’re at, and
it sounds like a tall order, but it’s doable."
*Cosanna
Preston is a freelance writer in Edmonton, and has just finished
her terms as senior news editor with the Gateway at the University
of Alberta and Alberta bureau chief with Canadian University Press.
She has researched Zimbabwe over the past year through these positions
and her academic studies in globalization and governance.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|