|
Back to Index
It's time to build a mass movement
Bruce Dixon
July 06, 2005
http://www.zmag.org/content/print_article.cfm?itemID=8237§ionID=1
"Democracy...
does not come from the government, from on high, it comes from people
getting together and struggling for justice." - Howard Zinn,
Spelman College commencement address, Atlanta, 2005.
Politicians
are elected and selected, but mass movements transform societies.
Judges uphold, strike down, or invent brand new law, but mass movements
drag the courts, laws and officeholders all in their wake. Progressive
and even partially successful mass movements can alter the political
calculus for decades to come, thus improving the lives of millions.
Social Security, the New Deal, and employer-provided medical care
didn't come from the pen of FDR. The end of "separate but equal"
didn't come from the lips of any judge, and voting rights were not
simply granted by the Voting Rights Act of 1965. All these were
hard-won outcomes of protracted struggle by progressive mass movements,
every one of which operated outside the law and none of which looked
to elected officials or the corporate media of those days for blessings
or legitimacy. It's time to re-learn those lessons and build a new
progressive mass movement in the United States.
Mass movements
are against the law
Mass movements
exist outside electoral politics, and outside the law, or they don't
exist at all. Mass movements are never respecters of law and order.
How can they be? A mass movement is an assertion of popular leadership
by the people themselves. A mass movement aims to persuade courts,
politicians and other actors to tail behind it, not the other way
around. Mass movements accomplish this through appeals to shared
sets of deep and widely held convictions among the people they aim
to mobilize, along with acts or credible threats of sustained and
popular civil disobedience.
Not all mass
movements are progressive. The legal strategy of "massive resistance"
to desegregation on the part of southern whites, in which local
governments across the south threw up thickets of lawsuits, evasions
and new statutes, closing whole school systems in some areas rather
than integrate, was implemented in response to and backed up by
the historically credible and ever-present threat of armed, lawless
white mobs long accustomed to dishing out violence to their black
neighbors and any white allies with impunity. They operated in a
context of popular belief in white superiority and black inferiority
that was widespread among whites of that region and time. Undeniable
proof of the existence of a violent, white supremacist mass movement
was broadcast around the world when thousands of local white citizens
showed up to trade blows, insults, and gunfire with federal marshals
in places like Little Rock, Arkansas in '57 and Oxford, Mississippi
in '62.
Likewise, courts
and public officials who enforced desegregation orders were under
relentless pressure from a civilly disobedient mass movement for
equality and justice. 89 leaders of the 1956 Montgomery Bus Boycott
could not have been surprised when they earned conspiracy indictments
for their trouble. Tens of thousands of mostly southern, mostly
black citizens defied unjust laws and were jailed in the waves of
mostly illegal sit-ins, marches, freedom rides and other mostly
illegal actions that swept the South for more than a decade. This
movement in turn relied on the deep convictions of all African Americans
and growing numbers of whites that segregation and white supremacy
were evils that had to be fought, regardless of personal costs.
For many, those costs were very high. Some are still paying.
Mass movements
are politically aggressive
Mass
movements are kindled into existence by unique combinations of outraged
public opinion in the movement's core constituency, political opportunity,
and aggressive leadership. The absence of any of these can prevent
a mass movement from materializing. In a January 20, 2005 BC article
occasioned by the death of visionary James Foreman, one of the masterminds
of the mid-century movement for civil and human rights, which contains
many useful insights on the characteristics of mass movements, David
Swanson recalled a recent lost opportunity in the wake of the 2000
presidential election: "Various small groups did act, and Rev.
Jesse Jackson became a leading spokesman for those objecting to
a stolen election. The coalition cobbled together was surprisingly
successful in moving Congress Members and Senators to at least give
lip service to the matter. The seeds of something may have been
sown. But a mass movement was not organized. Civil disobedience
was not used."
Democratic party
leaders instructed Jesse and the crew to go home and await the results
of court decisions. The black leadership acquiesced, and a chance
to galvanize a civilly disobedient mass movement around issues of
voting rights was missed.
Mass movements
are based on widely held beliefs, reinforced by dense communications
networks. Mass movements are nurtured and sustained not just by
vertical communication, between leaders and constituents, but by
lots of horizontal communication among the movement's constituency.
This horizontal communication serves to reinforce the constituency's
and the movement's core values. It emboldens ordinarily non-political
people to engage in personally risky behavior in support of the
movement's core demands, and builds support for this kind of risk-taking
on the part of those who may not be ready to do it themselves.
Forty and fifty
years ago, African American print media like the Chicago Defender,
the California Eagle, Baltimore Afro-American and the Pittsburg
Courier carried news of resistance to Jim Crow to millions of black
readers. Like white communities of that era, black neighborhoods
supported and were supported by a dense network of voluntary and
social organizations. Large numbers belonged to fraternal societies
such as Masons and the Eastern Star, and many more blacks than today
belonged to labor unions. Within these networks, the freedom struggle
was on everyone's lips as far down the chain as youngsters at Boy
Scout meetings in church basements on the south side of Chicago
in 1964. It was in places where these networks were weakest, or
where institutional gatekeepers like pastors could not be persuaded
to take part that the mass movement was slowest to take hold, as
this passage from the January 20, 2005 Cover Story of BC illustrates:
"Contrary to current mythology, the Black church was never
a great fountain of social activism. More often, suspicious and
small-minded clergy shut their doors against the winds of change...
In the years following the 1955 Montgomery bus boycott, church doors
were slammed shut in King's face throughout the South. As a preacher-led
organization, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC)
required a local church base in order to set up operations. The
same problems of Jim Crow and brutality existed in every southern
city, yet in town after town, King could not find a single church
that would open its doors to the SCLC. The 'movement' was sputtering.
Rather than mounting a grand sweep through the region, King found
himself hemmed in by the endemic fear and even hostility of Black
clergymen."
The current
environment presents a different set of challenges to those who
would build the dense horizontal communications networks needed
support a mass movement. Far fewer Americans belong to social, civic
and voluntary organizations now than 50 years ago. Sprawl forces
us to live further from and travel more hours getting to and from
work, school and shopping than ever before. To lift a revealing
quote from www.bowlingalone.com,
the web site of Robert Putnam's highly recommended book of the same
name, "...we sign fewer petitions, belong to fewer organizations
that meet, know our neighbors less, meet with friends less frequently,
and even socialize with our families less often. We're even bowling
alone. More Americans are bowling than ever before, but they are
not bowling in leagues."
If a progressive
mass movement is to be built in this era of sprawl and locked down
media monopolies, organizers must develop and deploy alternative
communications strategies to get and keep the movement's message
into a sufficient number of ears to sustain its influence and momentum.
No mass without
masses and no movement without youth
Mass movements
don't happen without masses. A mass movement whose organizers cannot
fill rooms and streets, and sometimes jails on short notice with
ordinarily non-political people in support of political demands
is no mass movement at all. Organizers and those who judge the work
of organizers must learn to count.
A progressive
mass movement is inconceivable without a prominent place for the
energy and creativity of youth. The finest young people of every
generation have the least patience with injustice. SNCC was the
Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, after all, and included
high school and college students across the South. The average age
of rank and file members of the Black Panther Party was 17 to 19.
SCLC's leading ministers in the early 60s were mostly under 30.
The 1960s movement for civil and human rights was spearheaded, and
often led by young people. Neither Martin Luther King nor Malcolm
X lived to be forty. Fred Hampton was only 21.
Any mass movement
aiming at social transformation must capture the enthusiasm and
energy of youth, including the willingness of young people to engage
in personally risky behavior.
What is a
mass movement?
Mass
movements are creations of the political moment, rooted in the shared
values of their core constituencies, nurtured by dense communications
networks among a supportive population. They are sustained by aggressive
leadership, and youthful enthusiasm. Mass movements inevitably employ
civil disobedience, and the civilly disobedient components of mass
movements must be carefully calculated in such a way as to maintain
support from broad sectors of the population it aims to mobilize,
and to increase support if they are violently repressed.
To enumerate
some of the typical qualities of mass movements:
Mass movements
have political demands anchored in the deeply shared values of their
core constituencies.
Mass movements
look to themselves and their shared values for legitimacy, not to
courts, laws or elected officials. A mass movement consciously aims
to lead politicians, not to be led by them.
Mass movements
are civilly disobedient, and continually maintain the credible threat
of civil disobedience.
Mass movements
are supported by lots of vertical and horizontal communication which
reinforces the core values of the constituency and emboldens large
numbers of ordinarily nonpolitical souls to engage in personally
risky behavior in support of the movement's political demands.
Mass movements
capture the energy, enthusiasm and risk taking spirit of youth.
Nobody ever heard of a mass movement of old or even middle aged
people.
In the absence
of any of these characteristics, no mass movement can be said to
exist.
Applying the
mass movement yardstick to real-life cases
Reparations?
The reparations movement undoubtedly speaks to widespread beliefs
among African Americans. But the last big reparations demonstration
in Washington, DC might not have drawn ten thousand souls. A mass
movement should be able to fill rooms in neighborhoods, not just
in whole cities. With no broad masses in motion over reparations,
no civil disobedience, and not much traction among black youth,
it's safe to say that there is no mass movement for reparations.
The anti-war
movement?
With the ability to put hundreds of thousands in the streets
several times a year in New York City, in DC, and the Bay Area,
one to twenty thousands in scores of other US cities and towns,
and hundreds more vigils, demos and meetings still happening each
week the antiwar movement passes the numbers test. But in contrast
to a generation ago, today's antiwar movement has so little respect
for itself and so much reverence for the two-party system that it
practically shut down months before the presidential election to
allow most of its leading lights to actively campaign for a pro-war
candidate. There is not much evidence of broadly popular antiwar
civil disobedience yet, either.
When the antiwar
movement loses its reverence for judges and elected officials, and
discovers some creative and popular ways to break the law, it will
be a mass movement.
The Million
Man March and the Millions More Movement?
While certainly big enough, the 1995 MMM was only a single day's
event. Although the still-existing policy of selective mass incarceration
of black men was in full swing, the MMM made absolutely no demands
for the transformation of society. It was, its leader said, all
about "atonement." There was no civil disobedience, and
no intent to sustain any militant action. Organizers of the MMM
remembered to collect money, but somehow neglected to pass around
a signup sheet, something even the most amateurish organizer knows
must be done. What an organizing tool a million man mailing list
might have been!
The organizers
of the 1995 affair who are driving the bus again this year, haven't
criticized themselves for not taking attendance, or for coming to
Washington to ignore political issues like health care, voting rights
and mass incarceration, or for excluding gays and women. What kind
of mass movement excludes women? Neither version of the MMM looks
like a mass movement.
Labor?
Union rights, pensions, Social Security and health benefits
were won by a struggle with all the hallmarks of a mass movement.
But that was two or three generations ago. Today's labor movement
isn't capturing youth, doesn't do civil disobedience, is unsure
of what its core values are, and collects dues to give to the "least
worst" politician instead of trying to make politicians follow
its lead. Whatever else it is, labor is not a mass movement any
more.
The women's
movement, pre-Roe v. Wade
Both in 1970 and a hundred years ago, this had all the characteristics
of a mass movement. Political demands, big numbers, leaders not
afraid to call politicians to account, and a fair amount of public,
popular civil disobedience. They eventually forced courts and politicians
to follow them rather than the other way around, and with some of
their key demands met, creative civil disobedience ceased, replaced
by reliance on courts, elected officials and corporate sponsorship.
Right now, there is no mass movement for the full equality of women.
A new Supreme Court, if it overthrows Roe v. Wade will make the
re-emergence of such a movement much more likely.
The religious
right
The religious right possesses a mass base, along with ambitious
and profoundly scary leaders. With corporate support it has been
successful in building its own communications networks and influencing
or seizing outright control over many civilian and military institutions.
The religious right does not follow politicians. Politicians pander
to it. Whenever the religious right starts being civilly disobedient,
we will see a mass movement with the potential to take us far down
the road toward fascism.
The Black Consensus,
the next progressive mass movement, and Gary
There is only one place America's next progressive mass movement
can come from. There is only one identifiable constituency with
a bedrock majority of its citizens in long term historical opposition
to our nation's imperial adventures overseas. This is America's
black one-eighth. While majorities of all Americans do believe in
universal health care, the right to organize unions, high quality
public education, a living wage, and that retirement security available
to everyone ought to be government policy, and many even believe
America is locking up too many people for too long, support for
these propositions is virtually unanimous among African Americans.
More than two
years ago, Black Commentator named this phenomenon the "Black
Consensus":
"African
Americans remain in remarkable, consistent agreement on political
issues, a shared commonality of views that holds strongly across
lines of income, gender and age. The Black Commentator's analysis
of biannual data from the Joint Center for Political and Economic
Studies confirms the vitality of a broad Black Consensus. Most importantly,
the data show that Black political behavior has not deviated from
recent historical patterns, nor is any significant Black demographic
group likely to diverge from these patterns in the immediate future.
"In newspaper
terms, there is no "split" among African Americans on
core political issues..."
The original
article, from which the above paragraph is lifted, is well worth
reviewing in its entirety. It is the statistical persistence of
the Black Consensus over decades of polling data and across classes,
generations and regions which marks out America's black one-eighth
as the likely origin, and the first indispensable core constituency
of any progressive mass movement to transform American society.
If such a mass movement is to succeed, it must not allow itself
to be contained within the black community. But that's where it
has to begin, around the core political demands of the Black Consensus.
Hence African
American elected officials and candidates for office on every level,
from the Congressional Black Caucus to local sheriffs and prosecutors
must be forced to address themselves to the Black Consensus. They
must be summarily judged for their positions on such issues as racially
selective mass incarceration, the unjust war in Iraq, American complicity
in the apartheid-like policies of Israel, universal health care,
equality of educational opportunity, and voting rights, and these
judgments made to stick. Mass movements do not and cannot follow
political office holders. A mass movement is an assertion of popular
leadership by the people themselves. It makes politicians into followers.
The Black Consensus,
and the cohesive communities of color from which it arises must
give birth to America's next progressive mass movement. Laying the
intelligent groundwork for such a movement will be the task before
us in our next historic meeting - "Going Back to Gary."
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|