| |
Back to Index
The G8 summit: A fraud and a circus
John
Pilger
June 24, 2005
http://www.newstatesman.com/200506270006
The front page of
the Observer on 12 June announced, "$55bn Africa debt deal 'a victory
for millions'". The "victory for millions" is a quotation of Bob Geldof,
who said, "Tomorrow 280 million Africans will wake up for the first time
in their lives without owing you or me a penny . . ." The nonsense of
this would be breathtaking if the reader's breath had not already been
extracted by the unrelenting sophistry of Bob Geldof, Bono, Tony Blair,
Gordon Brown, the Observer et al.
Africa's imperial
plunder and tragedy have been turned into a circus for the benefit of
the so-called G8 leaders due in Scotland next month and those of us willing
to be distracted by the barkers of the circus: the establishment media
and their "celebrities". The illusion of an anti-establishment crusade
led by pop stars - a cultivated, controlling image of rebellion - serves
to dilute a great political movement of anger. In summit after summit,
not one significant "promise" of the G8 has been kept, and the "victory
for millions" is no different. It is a fraud - actually a setback to reducing
poverty in Africa. Entirely conditional on vicious, discredited economic
programmes imposed by the World Bank and the IMF, the "package" will ensure
that the "chosen" countries slip deeper into poverty.
Is it any surprise
that this is backed by Blair and Brown, and Bush; even the White House
calls it a "milestone"? For them, it is a useful facade, held up by the
famous and the naive and the inane. Having effused about Blair, Geldof
describes Bush as "passionate and sincere" about ending poverty. Bono
has called Blair and Brown "the John and Paul of the global development
stage". Behind this front, rapacious power can "reorder" the lives of
millions in favour of totalitarian corporations and their control of the
world's resources.
There is no conspiracy;
the goal is no secret. Gordon Brown spells it out in speech after speech,
which liberal journalists choose to ignore, preferring the Treasury spun
version. The G8 communique announcing the "victory for millions" is unequivocal.
Under the section headline "G8 proposals for HIPC debt cancellation",
it says that debt relief will be granted to poor countries only if they
are shown to be "adjusting their gross assistance flows by the amount
given": in other words, their aid will be reduced by the same amount as
the debt relief. So they gain nothing. Paragraph two states that "it is
essential" that poor countries "boost private sector development" and
ensure "the elimination of impediments to private investment, both domestic
and foreign".
The "$55bn" claimed
by the Observer comes down, at most, to £1bn spread over 18 countries.
This will almost certainly be halved - providing less than six days' worth
of debt payments - because Blair and Brown want the IMF to pay its share
of the "relief" by revaluing its vast stock of gold, and passionate and
sincere Bush has said no. The first unmentionable is that the gold was
plundered originally from Africa. The second unmentionable is that debt
payments are due to rise sharply from next year, more than doubling by
2015. This will mean not "victory for millions", but death for millions.
At present, for every
$1 of "aid" to Africa, $3 are taken out by western banks, institutions
and governments, and that does not include the repatriated profit of transnational
corporations. Take the Democratic Republic of Congo. Thirty-two corporations,
all of them based in G8 countries, dominate the exploitation of this deeply
impoverished, minerals-rich country where millions have died in the "cause"
of 200 years of imperialism. In Cote d'Ivoire, three G8 companies control
95 per cent of the processing and export of cocoa, the main resource.
The profits of Unilever, a British company long in Africa, are a third
larger than Mozambique's GDP. One American company, Monsanto - of genetic
engineering notoriety - controls 52 per cent of South Africa's maize seed,
that country's staple food.
Blair could not give
two flying faeces for the people of Africa. Ian Taylor at the University
of St Andrews used the Freedom of Information Act to learn that while
Blair was declaiming his desire to "make poverty history", he was secretly
cutting the government's Africa desk officers and staff. At the same time,
his "Department for International Development" was forcing, by the back
door, privatisation of water supply in Ghana for the
benefit of British investors. This ministry lives by the dictates of
its "Business Partnership Unit", which is devoted to finding "ways in
which DfID can improve the enabling environment for productive investment
overseas and . . . contribute to the operation of the overseas financial
sector".
Poverty reduction?
Of course not. Instead, the world is subjected to a charade promoting
the modern imperial ideology known as neoliberalism, yet it is almost
never reported that way and the connections are seldom made. In the issue
of the Observer announcing "victory for millions" was a secondary news
item that British arms sales to Africa had reached £1bn. One British arms
client is Malawi, which pays out more on the interest on its debt than
its entire health budget, despite the fact that 15 per cent of its population
has HIV. Gordon Brown likes to use Malawi as an example of why "we should
make poverty history", yet Malawi will not receive a penny of the "victory
for millions" relief.
The charade is a gift
for Blair, who will try anything to persuade the public to "move on" from
the third unmentionable: his part in the greatest political scandal of
the modern era, his crime in Iraq. Although essentially an opportunist,
as his lying demonstrates, he presents himself as a Kiplingesque imperialist.
His "vision for Africa" is as patronising and exploitative as a stage
full of white pop stars (with black tokens now added). His Messianic references
to "shaking the kaleidoscope" of societies about which he understands
little and watching the pieces fall have translated into seven violent
interventions abroad, more than any British prime minister in half a century.
Bob Geldof, an Irishman at his court, duly knighted, says nothing about
this.
The protesters going
to the G8 summit at Gleneagles ought not to allow themselves to be distracted
by these games. If inspiration is needed, along with evidence that direct
action can work, they should look to Latin America's mighty popular movements
against total locura capitalista (total capitalist folly). They should
look to Bolivia, the poorest country in Latin America, where an indigenous
movement has Blair's and Bush's corporate friends on the run, and Venezuela,
the only country in the world where oil revenue has been diverted for
the benefit of the majority, and Uruguay and Argentina, Ecuador and Peru,
and Brazil's great landless people's movement. Across the continent, ordinary
people are standing up to the old Washington-sponsored order. "IQue se
vayan todos!" (Out with them all!) say the crowds in the streets.
Much of the propaganda
that passes for news in our own society is given to immobilising and pacifying
people and diverting them from the idea that they can confront power.
The current babble about Europe, of which no reporter makes sense, is
part of this; yet the French and Dutch No votes are part of the same movement
as in Latin America, returning democracy to its true home: that of power
accountable to the people, not to the "free market" or the war policies
of rampant bullies. And this is just a beginning.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|