|
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
Index of results, reports, press stmts and articles on March 31 2005 General Election - post Mar 30
Democracy
lost the elections
Daniel
Molokela
April 11, 2005
As a dark cloud
of doubt and uncertainty continues to surround the implications
of the just ended Parliamentary elections in Zimbabwe, one clear
fact is beginning to emerge.
That fact is
that whichever way one may choose to view the outcome of the recent
polling process, the reality is that there is now a hangover on
the efficacy of the political process in the crisis riddled country.
It appears instead of the MDC, it is in fact the notion of democracy
in Zimbabwe that lost the recent elections.
Indeed, contrary
to the desperate hopes and expectations of many progressive Zimbabweans
both at home and abroad, the elections have merely had the net effect
of exacerbating the already messy situation in the nation’s political
landscape. It is becoming more and more apparent to many disillusioned
Zimbabweans that that the perennial crisis that has for so long
undermined the country’s potential is far from over.
As I write many
Zimbabweans are completely shocked and disappointed by the outcome
of the recent electoral process. Many are busy wiggling and wallowing
in the muddy waters of self-pity and despondency. Others are busy
bracing themselves for a long haul of continued Zanu-PF misrule,
cronyism and patronage. Some already fear for the worst, the total
collapse of the entire nation’s political and socio-economic fabric.
The future is
uncertain. Hope has virtual deserted the country. Just the like
the basic commodities that have also suddenly abandoned their supermarket
shelves as if they are fleeing amid rumours of an advancing tsunami.
Things are bad. Life in Zimbabwe is now set to be harsher than ever
before. As it is, anyone may be justified in insisting that unless
something drastically positive happens, the worst is yet to come
for Zimbabwe.
To put the icing
on the cake, many who up to now where still lingering and wandering
aimlessly in the country hoping for a political change will now
consider leaving with immediate effect. Another mass exodus of the
local population is looming on the horizon. Sooner that later many
people will abandon Zimbabwe and venture out to seek for greener
pastures elsewhere.
Just like in
the aftermath of both the 2000 and 2005 elections when many hundreds
of thousands left the country, it is also likely that another huge
chunk of the local population will soon join the ever swelling ranks
of the Diaspora.
It would be
remembered that a lot of Zimbabweans had been led to believe that
they had the power to change their national destiny. It had been
preached by both the civic society movement and the opposition parties
alike that the people had the final say in the national agenda and
discourse.
In particular,
a lot of Zimbabweans had been inspired by the successful NO-vote
campaign against the daft Chidyausiku Constitution in February 2000.
In the aftermath of the euphoria that followed the surprise rejection
of the Government sponsored Constitution, a lot of Zimbabweans had
somehow assumed that the sun was about to set down on the Zanu-PF
political horizons.
Many enthusiastically
waited and then voted overwhelmingly for the opposition MDC. Many
presumed that after the June 2000 Parliamentary elections, Zanu-PF
will be given a red-carpet send off into the archives of Zimbabwean
political history.
But this was
not to be. As history would have it, Zanu-PF adopted a ‘by any means
necessary’ survival strategy that ensured that they ‘won’ the elections
by hook or crook.
Then in March
2002, a lot of people agreed to shake off the nagging effects of
the disappointment of 2000 and decided to give Zanu-PF the final
push. But again this was not to be. Robert Mugabe emerged the victor
amid the deafening cries from Morgan Tsvangirai that the election
result was the worst case of fraud in the nation’s electoral history.
The people’s hopes were once again, completely dashed by the regime.
As such when
March 2005 came, many were justifiably skeptical about the efficacy
of the elections as a vehicle for peaceful democratic change in
Zimbabwe. That profound level of lack of faith and trust in the
electoral system was confirmed by the MDC’s protracted process of
deciding on whether to participate or not. Eventually, the MDC decided
to participate under protest on a without prejudice basis.
Now that the
March 2005 elections have come and gone, it is once again clear
that the nation has been robbed of its right to determine its destiny.
Zanu-PF has once again conspired against the majority interest of
the nation. Zanu-PF has as usual chosen to sacrifice the will of
the nation on the altar of political expediency and self-aggrandizement.
Once again,
Zanu-PF has clearly shown that its survival has the utmost preponderance
over the ultimate survival of the broader nation. The wishes of
the majority have once again been subjected to the wishes of a long
discredited party, bereft of political vision and agenda. Zanu-PF
has in the net effect, transferred the nation’s hopes into its already
overdrawn account of visionless ness. The future is now a bounced
cheque for the majority of Zimbabweans.
It is thus clear
that the nation’s democratic process has once again exposed the
fallacy of the belief that change is possible via peaceful electoral
means. The option of using the elections to mortgage the future
of the country has now been utterly discredited. As it is, it is
dawning on the minds of many Zimbabweans that the solution to the
crisis in Zimbabwe may lie way beyond the elections.
The task therefore
of the civic society movement and the opposition parties alike is
to go back to the drawing board and draw up a new strategy for change
in Zimbabwe.
That strategy
will prima facie, be exclusionary of all other discredited processes
such as the Parliament and the Courts. It has to be a people-centred
strategy involving the disillusioned masses. It has to be a strategy
that might involve even moving beyond the movement for democratic
change. But I digress, suffice for me to say only time will tell.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|