|
Back to Index
Challenging
Chombo's undue influence
Takura Zhangazha
October 17, 2004
http://www.thestandard.co.zw/read.php?st_id=809
THE crusades
by the Minister of Local Government, Public Works and National Housing,
Ignatious Chombo, against local authorities in opposition strongholds
is the stuff that depressing politics is made of.
While it may sound like everyday language, the consistency the minister
has shown in dealing heavy-handedly with local governments has undermined
the democratisation process where it matters the most in Zimbabwe.
Perhaps with
deliberate and malicious intent, Chombo has begun a redefinition
of what it means to be a locally elected politician. He has, albeit
with the acquiescence of the executive, trivialised local government
elections, local political institutions and community-based organisations
beyond the pale.
He has shown
that local elections are secondary to the national ones not only
in relation to the practice of power, but more so in terms of their
relevance to the bringing of freedom to the doorstep of the people
of Zimbabwe.
In the capital
of Harare, there is a subtle if sometimes non-existent discontent
with the Chombo sanctioned remnants at Town House. The water crisis,
for all its health hazards as well as its continuity, is being articulated
in the most political of fashions. The government and its media
have placed the blame on the opposition councillors while the opposition,
in turn, has blamed blatant government interference in the activities
of council as the reason why the capital city is in its current
state.
What one might
however disagree with is the reaction to these machinations by Chombo
and officials in the ministry as well as the council. It is the
familiar feeling of anguish, hopelessness that pervades many a Harare
resident when they wake up in the morning to the stark realisation
that there is no water to take a bath/shower and any other such
uses that we make of water every morning. Beyond that, it is acquiescence,
and the shrugging of shoulders.
To explain this
acquiescence, it it is convenient and preferable simply to point
a finger at the repressive laws and brutality of the police but
that is patently inadequate. Chombo functions on the basis of the
politicisation of local government institutions and issues. At every
turn in his political manoevering, he waits to utilise the Urban
Councils Act to undermine the opposition led councils strictly for
the purpose of the reclaiming political ground lost by Zanu PF.
An example of
this type of political trickery has been the manner in which he
is dealing with the Bulawayo City Council's position on starving
residents in the City of Kings. Chombo conveniently ignores the
actual issue of the dying and starving, and pursues the mayor with
venom.
The opposition
councillors on the other hand, react in kind. They react with a
simultaneous politicisation of local council issues. They got into
office by correctly claiming the failure of Zanu PF but have since
proven inept at de-politicising their electoral victories in order
to garner support among the residents.
One might argue,
that everything in Zimbabwe is political and therefore the councillors
were not naive or simplistic in attacking Chombo from a politicised
view. True, this argument would sustain a conversation but I hazard
to add, would come nowhere near sustaining a continually politically
conscious urban populace.
What perhaps
should be addressed is the meaning of "local issues" and as a consequence,
the significance of local government in the context of Zimbabwe's
dictatorship. local issues related mainly to the provision of amenities
within a specific community. These services will include running
(and clean) water provision, health services, education and management
public transport.
This goes both
for the rural and the urban communities that comprise Zimbabwe.
These issues have direct relevance to people's lives and essentially,
are life and death matters. They do not in any way pre-suppose a
distant governing authority that is run solely on the basis of the
number of council meetings held or the type of offices that an authority
is housed in. Local issues are "living" or "organic" issues that
are articulated everyday in the locality in which they are residing.
In other words, local issues, because they relate to the day-to-day
events of people's lives, are the bedrock of mass mobilisation.
Chombo, by running
the Harare council into the ground, should have created fertile
ground for discontent within the capital. On the contrary however,
he has successfully managed, at least for now, to create a comfortable
victory for himself. Because the elected councillors reacted in
an "political" sense, by correctly accusing the government of usurping
the people's will, they lost out on the meaning of continued engagement
with the local issues affecting residents.
To clarify,
the engagement with local issues does not mean council resolutions
and availability of funds only from rates or central government.
It means continued mobilisation of residents on the basis of the
evident discontent over the manner in which services are being provided.
To centre on
power institutions is to miss the mark widely. A city council exists
in so far as it regulates the city, but the issues that are affecting
residents exist with them and they must be moved to act upon issues
that are being ignored.
When there have
been the organisation of demonstrations, issues of mass action,
the central focus has been targeting institutions of authority in
the country and articulation of a good governance agenda. The brave
men and women who have been organising these demonstrations have
to include as part of their grievances, local issues.
Moreover, they
need to decentralise these demonstrations to places such as residential
areas, where even though they will get less press coverage, they
will etch themselves into the local psyche for working on more immediate
concerns.
It is from there
that there will be a renewal of the popular support against the
government and the likes of Chombo.
The former MDC
councilors for Harare should now be directly involved in challenging
Chombo on the basis of community mobilisation in their wards, and
the creation of alternative means of dealing with the problems bedeviling
the residents.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|