|
Back to Index
High
Court dismisses appeal application in Zimbabwe torture case
Zimbabwe
Exiles Forum (ZEF)
June 07, 2012
The North Gauteng
High Court today dismissed an application for leave to appeal against
last month's ruling
that the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) and South African
Police Services (SAPS) must investigate crimes against humanity
committed in Zimbabwe.
This application,
brought by the NPA and SAPS, was in response to the High Court's
landmark ruling in favour of the Southern Africa Litigation Centre's
(SALC) and Zimbabwe Exile Forum's (ZEF). The NPA and SAPS
were found to have ignored their international and domestic Rome
Statute obligations to investigate torture as a crime against humanity
regardless of where the crime is committed or by whom. The High
Court ordered the SAPS and NPA to investigate allegations of torture
committed in Zimbabwe which were brought to the attention of NPA
and SAPS in 2008.
"This
decision confirms the correct application and interpretation of
South Africa's obligations to investigate and prosecute international
crimes," said Nicole Fritz, Executive Director of SALC. "The
NPA and SAPS must now take action and they can no longer justify
delaying the initiation of an investigation of crimes that have
been ignored for over four years."
The NPA and
SAPS argued that the High Court's finding that South Africa's
domestic Rome Statute Act requires South Africa to investigate core
international crimes when committed outside of South Africa was
incorrect. The NPA and SAPS maintain that South Africa only has
jurisdiction to prosecute these crimes. It was also argued that
the court had erred in accepting that SALC and ZEF had legal standing
to bring this case.
Judge Hans Fabricius
dismissed both arguments finding that NPA and SAPS failed to demonstrate
that this case was not brought in the public interest and in the
interest of the Zimbabwean torture victims. Judge Fabricius also
found that the NPA's and SAPS' interpretation would
render South Africa's domestic Rome Statute Act meaningless
and that they ignored the fact that investigations are a necessary
component of prosecutions.
In dismissing
the application Judge Fabricius concluded that an appeal has no
reasonable prospects of success and noted that even if leave to
appeal had been granted he would not have suspended the initiation
of an investigation pending the outcome of an appeal.
Visit the ZEF
fact
sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|