Parties |
Complaint |
Status |
Tarisai
Gashu vs the Standard
(7 January 2012)
|
- Ms
Tarisai Gashu lodged a complaint with the VMCZ over a story
published in the Standard of 1-7 January 2012 entitled,"
Health experts warning on sanitary pads."
- Ms
Gashu alleges that her name was used in the story yet the
reporter never interviewed her.
- Ms
Gashu says she is a health worker and the publication of
the story has affected her at her workplace. She says the
story has also affected her marriage.
- Ms
Gashu wants the reporter who wrote the story to prove which
Tarisai Gashu she interviewed.
|
Status: Finalised
The
MCC after giving careful consideration to the submissions
raised by Ms Gashu ruled that there was no breach of the Media
Code of Conduct on the part of The Standard. The MCC however
instructed The Standard newspaper to carry a clarification
in its edition, with a picture of Gashu, putting the record
straight. The MCC said The Standard should clarify that she
is not the Tarisai Gashu who was interviewed and reported
on in the paper's edition of 1-7 January 2012.
|
Doctor
Mauchaza vs The Herald and The Daily News
(3 January 2012)
|
- Doctor
Katherine Mauchaza launched a complaint with the VMCZ over
a story published by the Daily News of 3 January 2012 entitled,
"Doctor in the Doc for destroying sister's property"
- The
article alleged that Doctor Mauchaza ran amok and destroyed
her sister-in- law's property following an altercation
over title deeds.
- Dr
Mauchaza complained that the article made unfounded and
malicious allegations about her, which allegations were
meant to tarnish her professional reputation as a doctor.
- Doctor
Mauchaza in her complaint says the matter was brought before
the courts and she was acquitted but The Daily News and
The Herald did not carry the acquittal story.
- Dr
Mauchaza says she wants both the Daily News and The Herald
to publish the story of her acquittal as the original story
reported was affecting her return to the United Kingdom
where she is based.
|
Status:
Resolved
The
MCC after due deliberations engaged both the Herald and The
Daily News who both published the acquittal stories in their
editions of 31 January 2012 (Daily News) headlined, "Harare
doctor acquitted of malicious damage to property charges".
The Herald also carried a story of the acquittal after the
MCC contacted the paper.
|
Cllr Demo
vs The Chronicle
(21 January 2012)
|
- Mr
Taurai Demo filed a complaint with the VMCZ over an article
entitled, "Soldier commits suicide over wife's
infidelity which appeared in the Chronicle of 21 January
2012.
- Mr.
Demo alleges that the story is false as he never had any
extra marital affair with Mr Chitsiko's wife. Demo
wants the Chronicle to publish an apology as the story is
completely false.
- Mr
Demo feels that the Newspaper contravened section 4b of
the Media Code of Conduct for Media Practitioners.
- Section
(4b) of the Media code of conduct states that, "Media
practitioners and media institutions must never publish
information that they know to be false or maliciously make
unfounded allegations about others that are intended to
harm their reputation".
|
Status:
Finalised
The committee reviewed the matter and the
complainant agreed to engage then editor of the Chronicle,
Mr Innocent Gore, over the story. Mr Gore indicated to the
MCC that he was ready to engage.
|
Morris
Mutema vs Newsday
(17 January 2012)
|
- Morris
Mutema, the acting Kwekwe city treasurer, lodged a complaint
with the VMCZ over an article published in the Newsday of
17 January 2012 entitled "Audit report confirms looting
of funds".
- Mr
Mutema is aggrieved as he claims the story is entirely false
and that he was not contacted to comment on the story.
- He
wants NewsDay to publish a retraction of the story.
|
Status
:Finalised
The MCC in its judgment after inviting both
parties to give their side of the story ruled that the published
story was not balanced since it did not mention that the audit
report had not been finalised. The committee also noted that
Mr Mutema was not contacted to comment on the contents of
the audit report. The MCC stated that Newsday should engage
with Mr Mutema and find a solution that will allow Mr Mutema
to give his side of the story.
|
Ishmael
Mafundike vs the Herald
(1 May 2012)
|
- Mafundike
filed a complaint with the VMCZ over an article entitled,"
Ethanol plant to lay off 4500, published in the Herald of
1 May 2012.
- Mafundike
alleges that the story was entirely false as the plant located
in Chisumbanje does not have the stated number of farm workers
and allegations made in the story were therefore false.
Mr Mafundike wants the Herald to publish a retraction as
the story
|
Status:
Finalised
The complainant in the matter Mr Mafundike
indicated that he would instead engage the newspaper on the
matter first and will revert to the VMCZ if his engagement
with the newspaper fail.
|
Stanford
Zhou vs The Sunday Mail
(6 May 2012)
|
- Stanford
Zhou filed a complaint with the VMCZ over an article entitled,
"Agony of maintaining someone's child ",
published in the Sunday Mail of 6 May 2012.
- Zhou
says the Sunday Mail used a picture of him in a story which
does not relate to him thus tarnishing his name.
- Zhou
says the story has caused unnecessary friction between him
and his wife resulting in their separation.
- Zhou
is seeking guidance from VMCZ.
|
Status:
Finalised
- The
matter was referred to the Sunday Mail and Mr Zhou met with
the Sunday Mail team and the paper offered to do an apology.
- However
Mr Zhou indicated that he did not only want an apology but
wanted monetary compensation.
- VMCZ
however does not deal with matters involving financial compensation
and advised Mr Zhou accordingly.
|
Lucky Tshuma
vs B-Metro
(24 May 2012)
|
- Lucky
Shuma, a freelance photojournalist filed a complaint claiming
that B Metro newspaper allegedly used one of his pictures
without his permission.
- Tshuma
says the practice by the newspaper is unethical and accused
the paper of infringing copywrite laws and wants the paper
to acknowledge his picture and pay for its use.
|
Status:
Finalised
The MCC in arriving at a decision found that
there was no clear proof of ownership of the picture as both
parties claimed ownership of the picture. The committee however
noted that the picture was posted on the social network platform
by Mr. Tshuma. The committee felt that any material posted
on Facebook was difficult to keep track of as users copy and
make numerous copies of pictures. In the circumstances the
committee advised Mr Tshuma to protect his works
|
Alistair
MacNeilage vs Techzim
(22 August 2012)
|
- Mr
Alistair McNailage filed a complaint with the VMCZ over
an article entitled, "Two Econet Facebook pages, one
of them is Fake" published on Techzim website www.techzim.co.zw
on 22 August 2012.
- Mr
McNailage is aggrieved as he says the article published
by Techzim is false and says the allegations on Communication
Twenty Four Seven are baseless.
- Mr
McNailage says the statements made in the article are damaging
to the company's reputation.
- He
also complains that Techzim never made any effort to investigate
the matter and the article was based on wrong assumptions.
McNeilage says they were not given a right of reply in the
story.
|
Status:
Finalised
The MCC after hearing from both parties ruled
that TechZim should give a right of reply to Mr McNeilage.
The MCC said TechZim should publish a story giving Mr McNeilage
a chance to respond to the published article.
Status: Finalised
After engaging the Daily news on the matter
the newspaper published a story clarifying that the George
Sande who lodged a complaint with the VMCZ is not the same
as the one referred to in the story published by the Daily
News.
|
George
Sande vs Daily News
(24 August 2012
|
- Goerge
Sande lodged a complaint with the VMCZ over an article published
in the Daily News of 24 August 2012 headlined "Man
Pees in Pots".
- Mr
Sande is complaining that the Daily News reported that a
man called Goerge Sande was taken to the civil court by
his wife for urinating in the household pots.
- Mr
Sande is aggrieved as he says he also bears the name Goerge
Sande and he is not the Goerge Sande mentioned in the story.
He also says he is not related to the Sande mentioned in
the story.
- Mr
Sande says the press should have given the age, place were
the offence was committed and the residence of the culprit
so as to distinguish the real person.
- Mr
Sande says he is a highly respected individual and the publication
of the story has resulted in him being the talk of the town.
|
Status:
Finalised
After engaging the Daily news on the matter
the newspaper published a story clarifying that the George
Sande who lodged a complaint with the VMCZ is not the same
as the one referred to in the story published by the Daily
News.
|
Tafara
Chikumira vs Radio
VOP
(18 January 2012)
|
- Tafara
Chikumira launched a complaint with the VMCZ over a story
published by Radio VOP on 8 November 2012 entitled "ZBC
reporter part of ZANU PF violence".
- The
article insinuated that Mr Chikumira was associated with
a group named Chipangano which was involved in political
violence.
- Chikumira
complained that allegations that he took part in the violence
are false and malicious to him
|
Status
:Finalised
- The
MCC after due deliberations determined that they was no
breach of the Media Code of Conduct on the part of Radio
VOP as the online publication wrote the story based on an
statement citing a political party (MDC).
- The
MCC however ruled that Radio VOP should carry a story outlining
that Mr Chikumira appeared before the MCC and denied allegations
that that he was part of Chipangano.
|
Morris
Mutema vs Newsday
(13 November 2012)
|
- Mr
Mutema filed a complaint with the VMCZ over an article entitled,
"Heads to roll at Kwekwe Council- Chombo", published
in the Newsday of 13 November 2012.
- Mr
Mutema, who is the Kwekwe acting city treasurer, feels that
the headline is misleading as it implies that Chombo made
a direct comment on the story when in fact he is not even
quoted in the story.
- Mr
Mutema says the story is false as it alleges that a special
audit report was handed to the local authority yet there
is no such report.
- Mr
Mutema is also disputing claims that there is a press embargo
which bars council officials from speaking to the press.
Mr Mutema says he is not aware of the press embargo.
|
Status:
Finalised
- The
Media Complaints Committee, invited both parties to a hearing
on the matter. After hearing from both parties, the MCC
ruled that Mr Mutema's complaint was misplaced as
a special audit report was produced by the Ministry contrary
to his claims that there was none.
- The
MCC ruled that Newsday should avail a copy of the Audit
report to Mr Mutema for him to go over and afford him an
opportunity to respond to the audit report.
- The
MCC also ruled that Newsday should make a follow up on the
allegations raised by Mr Mutema. Mr Mutema alleged that
Local Government Minister Ignatius Chombo, wrote to the
council disassociating himself from the special audit report
in question.
- The
Committee advised Newsday to look into the issue and investigate.
|
Johnson
Masawi vs Newsday
(27 April 2012)
|
- Mr.
Johnson Masawi launched a complaint with the VMCZ over a
story published in the Newsday of April 27 2012 entitled,
"Workers at Masawi Farm offered $13 wages".
- Mr
Masawi alleges that the story is false as their farm workers
were not being paid the amount stated in the newspaper.
- Mr
Masawi wants Newsday to publish an apology as the story
was false and meant to tarnish the image of his family.
|
Status:
Resolved
The matter was referred back to Newsday newspaper
where the paper and the complaint amicably resolved the matter.
|
Ali
Johnson Mukuku vs H-Metro
(13 November 2012)
|
- Mr
Ali Johnson Mukuku filed a complaint with the VMCZ over
an article entitled, "Zimbabwe charity home turns
into a maximum prison" which he indicates appeared
in the H. Metro of 10 December 2010.
- Mr
Mikuku who is an official at a charity home named Fatima
Zahra centre says the article has contains false statements
about the charity home.
- The
article implies that there is extreme child abuse at the
charity home. However Mr Mukuku says the allegations are
false and are damaging to the image of the donor funded
charity home.
- Mr
Mukuku wants H-Metro to retract the whole story as donors
are citing the story to deny the centre funding.
|
Status:
Finalised
The MCC reviewed the case and established
that the story was published in 2009 instead of 2010. The
MCC conceded that the time frame was not within the committees
jurisdiction.
|