|
Back to Index
Weekly Media Review 2011-23
The Media Monitoring Project Zimbabwe
Monday June 6th - Sunday June 12th 2011
June 17, 2011
Download
this document
- Acrobat
PDF version (572KB)
If you do not have the free Acrobat reader
on your computer, download it from the Adobe website by clicking
here
State
media peddle fibs about SADC summit
Claims by the
government media that SADC leaders had "rejected" the
decisions of the regional grouping's Troika on Politics, Defence
and Security in Livingstone,
Zambia, during their meeting
in South Africa last weekend, sparked heated debate in the media.
The Troika condemned
Zimbabwe's coalition parties for failing to stem political
violence and being slow to implement the terms of the Global
Political Agreement (GPA). These media based their claims on
President Mugabe and Foreign Affairs Minister Simbarashe Mumbengegwi's
perspective (The Herald, 13/6 and ZTV & Radio Zimbabwe, 13/6,
7am & 8pm).
Mumbengegwi
said: "The summit went on very well, very, very well. Summit
only noted the outcome of Livingstone, they did not endorse; Summit
noted. And . . . in diplomatic parlance, you know what 'noting'
means? It was noted, it was not endorsed".
It was on this
basis that the government media misleadingly reported the SADC summit
as having "rejected" the outcome of the "controversial"
Livingstone meeting "that was fraught with procedural irregularities".
Nowhere in their reports was Mugabe or Mumbengegwi directly quoted
saying SADC had rejected the Livingstone report.
In addition
to falsely informing their audiences, these media censored or suffocated
the resolutions of the SADC summit itself, particularly its demands
for the implementation of the GPA; the adoption of the SADC electoral
roadmap reforms; and its decision to send a team to assist Zimbabwe's
Joint Monitoring and Implementation Committee (JOMIC) in discharging
its duties in their news reports.
Instead, they gave prominence to ZANU PF's perception that
the removal of Western sanctions was the major highlight of the
summit, while it ignored calls for security sector reforms and concerns
over political violence, as those issues were "nonsense"
(The Herald, 13/6).
The private
media presented a more accurate picture of what transpired.
They quoted
political commentators, the two MDC formations, SADC officials and
members of South African President Jacob Zuma's facilitation
team dismissing claims attributed to ZANU PF that the SADC summit
had rejected the Livingstone report, claiming that the summit had
actually endorsed it (Radio VoP, the Daily News and NewsDay, 13
& 14/6).
Lindiwe Zulu,
a member of the South African facilitation team said: "Whether
you use 'noted' or 'endorsed', it means
the same. As far as the summit is concerned, the Troika report presented
in Zambia by President Zuma has now been fully endorsed by SADC"
(NewsDay, 14/6).
Download
full document
Visit the MMPZ
fact
sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|