|
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
New Constitution-making process - Index of articles
Resolutions of the 2nd national media stakeholders conference
MISA-Zimbabwe
June 11, 2010
Representatives
of media organisations in Zimbabwe who met at the Rainbow Towers
in Harare on 28 May 2010 to discuss the state of the media in the
country agreed that:
1. The Zimbabwe
constitution must guarantee freedom of expression, including
clear and specific clauses on media freedom, access to public information,
academic freedom and artistic activity.
2. We urge
the government of Zimbabwe to immediately repeal all repressive
laws affecting media practice such as AIPPA,
POSA,
the Interception
of Communications Act, Criminal
Law (Codification and Reform) Act and The Official
Secrets Act.
3. We do not
agree with plans to replace the repressive AIPPA with a Media Practitioners
Bill and a Freedom of Information Act that attempt to control media
freedom and diminish citizens' rights to access information.
4. There should
be no compulsory registration of journalists or prescriptive qualifications.
Any accreditation of journalists should be a simple administrative
exercise that does not carry the option of rejection and only for
the purposes of professional identification.
5. Zimbabwe
media stakeholders will only support a Freedom of Information Act
that provides for easy access to information held by public bodies
with clearly but narrowly defined limitations subject to appeal
to an independent body.
6. We reluctantly
recognise the Zimbabwe Media Council as a transitional mechanism
towards voluntary regulation of the media, and urge all stakeholders
to commit themselves to this goal.
7. We urge
all media stakeholders to resist any attempts to co-opt the Voluntary
Media Council of Zimbabwe into the Zimbabwe Media Council to
implement repellent and repressive legislation.
8. We acknowledge
the licensing of new newspapers by the Zimbabwe Media Council but
are seriously concerned about the silence and inaction on establishing
an independent and effective body to issue licences for the broadcasting
media.
9. We call
on stakeholders working on community and commercial radio station
projects to submit their applications to existing licensing authorities
to test their commitment to media freedom.
10. While we
are obliged to recognise the legal existence of the Broadcasting
Authority of Zimbabwe as a transitional entity, we consider the
appointment of the present board to be null and void. In addition,
we demand the immediate establishment of an independent and professional
broadcasting authority and urge it to consider applications for
broadcasting licences immediately upon being established.
11. All legislation
affecting the broadcasting environment must encourage a diverse
range of broadcasters to operate at national, local and community
levels.
12. We call
upon all media stakeholders to give maximum support to strengthen
the Voluntary Media Council of Zimbabwe so that it becomes truly
representative and effective in its operations.
13. Registration
of any print media should be a simple administrative exercise that
does not carry the option of rejection, and that any media business
should not be subjected to any special levies beyond those imposed
on other businesses.
Visit
the MISA-Zimbabwe fact
sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|